{"title":"战争电影","authors":"Michael S. Shull","doi":"10.5860/choice.42-4549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robert Eberwein, editor. The War Film. Rutgers University Press, 2004. 236 pages; $22.95. Fundamental Elements Why we fight, or, more precisely, how we are and have been projected as a warring nation on film, is the subject of this edited book on American war films. Only a few classic foreign-made works are mentioned in passing. What should also be noted is that this book is largely concerned with the fictional combat or pseudo combat film as opposed to war dramas and/or various generic hybrids, such as training and POW films. In an otherwise thoughtful and informative introduction, this crucial distinction is never clearly engaged. Instead, the extended analytical introduction focuses on the most fundamental elements of the war film genre: documenting, re-enacting, and/or creating narratives concerning the experience of war-most particularly World War II and the Vietnam War-and then outlines the four predictable thematic sections of the book: Genre, Race, Gender, History. The War Film is thereafter comprised of a series of previously published articles and excerpts from books originally appearing in print between the mid 1980s and 2003. But, unfortunately, none have been revised in any way so that simple, but basic, factual errors remain. For instance: the wrong release date for John Ford's The Lost Patrol ( 1934) in the contribution from Jeanine Basinger 's seminal 1986 book, The World War II Combat Film. Though initially intended primarily for an academic audience, the selections are mostly jargon free and engage films that are easily accessible on DVD-a plus for using this book as a classroom text. A minus concerns its limiting dependence upon the list of usual suspects. An outstanding exception is Tania Modeleski's discussion of Dogfight (1991). After pointing out the misogyny in many Vietnam War-oriented films, she focuses on this comparatively obscure female-directed film starring River Phoenix and Lili Taylor. Presented as a 1966 flashback on personal events that took place in San Francisco in November 1963, Dogfight creates an interesting take on the collective psychology of America on the eve of its entrance into that prolonged conflict - through the eyes of an awkward young woman who has a less than traditional romantic encounter with a young soldier. Though definitely from a feminist perspective, neither the film nor Modeleski's close reading of it are didactic. The short contribution on All Quiet on the Western Front (1930) seems to be included for no other reason than that the film is part of the hoary canon of antiwar films. It is a weakly developed attempt to highlight the basic components of the antiwar subgenre that has not improved with age since its original publication in 1998. Moreover, it displays a superficial historical knowledge about that horrific 20th century global conflict and utterly fails to contextually establish why such antiwar statements were made, their impact, if any, and upon whom. There is an extended extract from Basinger's book The World War II Combat Film. Through a close reading of the classic Bataan (1943), she succeeds in more or less codifying the basic combat film formula, that, with few exceptions, centers upon the multiethnic, class, universal unit. All who have subsequently written on the subject, including myself, cannot help but have been influenced by her work. Basinger reinforces and expands upon her thesis by a comparison of the combat unit to a family within the tight confines of a submarine on patrol as portrayed in another WWII American film, starring Cary Grant as the captain, Destination Tokyo (1943). Interestingly, this is the only section of Eberwein's The War Film to engage the subject of non-ground combat. Dana Polan's contribution centers upon director Terence Malick's idiosyncratic cinematic interpretation of The Thin Red Line (1998). Polan not only focuses on the auteurism of the director but also upon the complex intersection between reality and the viewer's perceptions of reality-is the surreal perspective of a film's character more \"real\" in regards to the experience of warfare than such graphic representations of combat violence as the much-touted opening twenty minutes of Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan (1998)? …","PeriodicalId":51888,"journal":{"name":"Film History","volume":"64 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The War Film\",\"authors\":\"Michael S. Shull\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.42-4549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robert Eberwein, editor. The War Film. Rutgers University Press, 2004. 236 pages; $22.95. Fundamental Elements Why we fight, or, more precisely, how we are and have been projected as a warring nation on film, is the subject of this edited book on American war films. Only a few classic foreign-made works are mentioned in passing. What should also be noted is that this book is largely concerned with the fictional combat or pseudo combat film as opposed to war dramas and/or various generic hybrids, such as training and POW films. In an otherwise thoughtful and informative introduction, this crucial distinction is never clearly engaged. Instead, the extended analytical introduction focuses on the most fundamental elements of the war film genre: documenting, re-enacting, and/or creating narratives concerning the experience of war-most particularly World War II and the Vietnam War-and then outlines the four predictable thematic sections of the book: Genre, Race, Gender, History. The War Film is thereafter comprised of a series of previously published articles and excerpts from books originally appearing in print between the mid 1980s and 2003. But, unfortunately, none have been revised in any way so that simple, but basic, factual errors remain. For instance: the wrong release date for John Ford's The Lost Patrol ( 1934) in the contribution from Jeanine Basinger 's seminal 1986 book, The World War II Combat Film. Though initially intended primarily for an academic audience, the selections are mostly jargon free and engage films that are easily accessible on DVD-a plus for using this book as a classroom text. A minus concerns its limiting dependence upon the list of usual suspects. An outstanding exception is Tania Modeleski's discussion of Dogfight (1991). After pointing out the misogyny in many Vietnam War-oriented films, she focuses on this comparatively obscure female-directed film starring River Phoenix and Lili Taylor. Presented as a 1966 flashback on personal events that took place in San Francisco in November 1963, Dogfight creates an interesting take on the collective psychology of America on the eve of its entrance into that prolonged conflict - through the eyes of an awkward young woman who has a less than traditional romantic encounter with a young soldier. Though definitely from a feminist perspective, neither the film nor Modeleski's close reading of it are didactic. The short contribution on All Quiet on the Western Front (1930) seems to be included for no other reason than that the film is part of the hoary canon of antiwar films. It is a weakly developed attempt to highlight the basic components of the antiwar subgenre that has not improved with age since its original publication in 1998. Moreover, it displays a superficial historical knowledge about that horrific 20th century global conflict and utterly fails to contextually establish why such antiwar statements were made, their impact, if any, and upon whom. There is an extended extract from Basinger's book The World War II Combat Film. Through a close reading of the classic Bataan (1943), she succeeds in more or less codifying the basic combat film formula, that, with few exceptions, centers upon the multiethnic, class, universal unit. All who have subsequently written on the subject, including myself, cannot help but have been influenced by her work. Basinger reinforces and expands upon her thesis by a comparison of the combat unit to a family within the tight confines of a submarine on patrol as portrayed in another WWII American film, starring Cary Grant as the captain, Destination Tokyo (1943). Interestingly, this is the only section of Eberwein's The War Film to engage the subject of non-ground combat. Dana Polan's contribution centers upon director Terence Malick's idiosyncratic cinematic interpretation of The Thin Red Line (1998). Polan not only focuses on the auteurism of the director but also upon the complex intersection between reality and the viewer's perceptions of reality-is the surreal perspective of a film's character more \\\"real\\\" in regards to the experience of warfare than such graphic representations of combat violence as the much-touted opening twenty minutes of Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan (1998)? …\",\"PeriodicalId\":51888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Film History\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Film History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-4549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-4549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
Robert Eberwein,编辑。战争电影。罗格斯大学出版社,2004年。236页;22.95美元。我们为什么要打仗,或者更准确地说,我们是如何在电影中作为一个战争国家被投射出来的,这是这本关于美国战争电影的编辑书籍的主题。只有几部外国经典作品被顺带提及。值得注意的是,这本书主要关注的是虚构的战斗或伪战斗电影,而不是战争剧和/或各种通用的混合体,如训练和战俘电影。在另一篇深思熟虑且内容丰富的引言中,这一关键的区别从未被明确提及。相反,扩展的分析性介绍侧重于战争电影类型的最基本元素:记录、再现和/或创造关于战争经历的叙事——尤其是第二次世界大战和越南战争——然后概述了本书的四个可预见的主题部分:类型、种族、性别、历史。《战争电影》由一系列先前发表的文章和从20世纪80年代中期到2003年出版的书籍摘录而成。但是,不幸的是,没有一个被以任何方式修改,所以简单但基本的事实错误仍然存在。例如:约翰·福特的《迷失的巡逻队》(1934)的上映日期是错误的,这是珍妮·贝辛格1986年出版的影响深远的《第二次世界大战战斗电影》的贡献。虽然最初主要是为学术读者准备的,但这些选择大多是没有术语的,而且很容易在dvd上获得——这是将本书用作课堂教材的一个加分项。一个缺点是它对通常嫌疑人列表的有限依赖。一个突出的例外是Tania Modeleski关于Dogfight(1991)的讨论。在指出了许多越战题材电影中的厌女现象之后,她把注意力放在了这部由莱弗·菲尼克斯(River Phoenix)和莉莉·泰勒(Lili Taylor)主演的相对不知名的女性导演的电影上。作为1963年11月发生在旧金山的个人事件的1966年闪回,《斗狗》通过一个尴尬的年轻女人与一个年轻士兵不太寻常的浪漫邂逅的眼睛,在美国进入这场旷日持久的冲突前夕,创造了一个有趣的集体心理。虽然绝对是从女权主义的角度来看,但无论是电影还是莫德莱斯基对它的仔细阅读都不是说教。他对《西线无战事》(1930)的简短贡献似乎没有别的原因,只是因为这部电影是反战电影中陈旧经典的一部分。这是一个薄弱的发展尝试,以突出反战亚流派的基本组成部分,自1998年首次出版以来,并没有随着时间的推移而得到改善。此外,它对20世纪那场可怕的全球冲突只有肤浅的历史认识,完全没有从背景上确定为什么会发表这样的反战言论,它们的影响(如果有的话),以及对谁产生了影响。这是贝辛格的书《第二次世界大战的战斗电影》中的一段摘录。通过对经典电影《巴丹》(Bataan, 1943)的仔细阅读,她成功地或多或少地编纂了基本的战斗电影公式,除了少数例外,它都以多民族、阶级和普遍的单位为中心。所有后来写过这个主题的人,包括我自己,都不能不受到她作品的影响。贝辛格在另一部二战美国电影《东京目的地》(1943)中,将作战部队比作一个在潜艇巡逻的狭小空间里的家庭,巩固并扩展了她的论点。这部电影由加里·格兰特(gary Grant)饰演船长。有趣的是,这是埃伯韦恩的《战争电影》中唯一一个涉及非地面战斗的部分。达纳·波兰的贡献主要体现在导演特伦斯·马利克对《细细的红线》(1998)的独特电影诠释上。波兰不仅关注导演的个人风格,还关注现实与观众对现实的感知之间的复杂交叉点——在战争经历方面,电影角色的超现实视角是否比斯皮尔伯格(Spielberg)的《拯救大兵瑞恩》(Saving Private Ryan, 1998)中被大肆吹捧的开场20分钟的战斗暴力形象表现更“真实”?…
Robert Eberwein, editor. The War Film. Rutgers University Press, 2004. 236 pages; $22.95. Fundamental Elements Why we fight, or, more precisely, how we are and have been projected as a warring nation on film, is the subject of this edited book on American war films. Only a few classic foreign-made works are mentioned in passing. What should also be noted is that this book is largely concerned with the fictional combat or pseudo combat film as opposed to war dramas and/or various generic hybrids, such as training and POW films. In an otherwise thoughtful and informative introduction, this crucial distinction is never clearly engaged. Instead, the extended analytical introduction focuses on the most fundamental elements of the war film genre: documenting, re-enacting, and/or creating narratives concerning the experience of war-most particularly World War II and the Vietnam War-and then outlines the four predictable thematic sections of the book: Genre, Race, Gender, History. The War Film is thereafter comprised of a series of previously published articles and excerpts from books originally appearing in print between the mid 1980s and 2003. But, unfortunately, none have been revised in any way so that simple, but basic, factual errors remain. For instance: the wrong release date for John Ford's The Lost Patrol ( 1934) in the contribution from Jeanine Basinger 's seminal 1986 book, The World War II Combat Film. Though initially intended primarily for an academic audience, the selections are mostly jargon free and engage films that are easily accessible on DVD-a plus for using this book as a classroom text. A minus concerns its limiting dependence upon the list of usual suspects. An outstanding exception is Tania Modeleski's discussion of Dogfight (1991). After pointing out the misogyny in many Vietnam War-oriented films, she focuses on this comparatively obscure female-directed film starring River Phoenix and Lili Taylor. Presented as a 1966 flashback on personal events that took place in San Francisco in November 1963, Dogfight creates an interesting take on the collective psychology of America on the eve of its entrance into that prolonged conflict - through the eyes of an awkward young woman who has a less than traditional romantic encounter with a young soldier. Though definitely from a feminist perspective, neither the film nor Modeleski's close reading of it are didactic. The short contribution on All Quiet on the Western Front (1930) seems to be included for no other reason than that the film is part of the hoary canon of antiwar films. It is a weakly developed attempt to highlight the basic components of the antiwar subgenre that has not improved with age since its original publication in 1998. Moreover, it displays a superficial historical knowledge about that horrific 20th century global conflict and utterly fails to contextually establish why such antiwar statements were made, their impact, if any, and upon whom. There is an extended extract from Basinger's book The World War II Combat Film. Through a close reading of the classic Bataan (1943), she succeeds in more or less codifying the basic combat film formula, that, with few exceptions, centers upon the multiethnic, class, universal unit. All who have subsequently written on the subject, including myself, cannot help but have been influenced by her work. Basinger reinforces and expands upon her thesis by a comparison of the combat unit to a family within the tight confines of a submarine on patrol as portrayed in another WWII American film, starring Cary Grant as the captain, Destination Tokyo (1943). Interestingly, this is the only section of Eberwein's The War Film to engage the subject of non-ground combat. Dana Polan's contribution centers upon director Terence Malick's idiosyncratic cinematic interpretation of The Thin Red Line (1998). Polan not only focuses on the auteurism of the director but also upon the complex intersection between reality and the viewer's perceptions of reality-is the surreal perspective of a film's character more "real" in regards to the experience of warfare than such graphic representations of combat violence as the much-touted opening twenty minutes of Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan (1998)? …
期刊介绍:
The subject of Film History is the historical development of the motion picture, and the social, technological, and economic context in which this has occurred. Its areas of interest range from the technical through all aspects of production and distribution. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.