{"title":"社区居住老年人使用的步行设备:比例、类型及相关因素","authors":"Patcharawan Suwannarat PT, PhD Candidate , Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PT, PhD , Supapon Kaewsanmung PT, MSc , Lugkana Mato PT, PhD , Sugalya Amatachaya PT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Advancing age is likely to increase the requirement for walking devices. However, the existing evidence mostly involves all types of external devices used from participants in developed countries with or without medical problems. The findings may be different from the data on the use of walking devices exclusively, particularly for the elderly who live in a rural community of a developing country.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored the proportion, types, and factors associated with the use of walking devices in 343 elderly aged ≥ 65 years who live in a rural area of Thailand.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The participants were interviewed and assessed for their walking device used and functional mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data demonstrated that 74 participants (22%) used a walking device for mobility. Most of them used a modified walking stick (70%), followed by a standard single cane (27%), and a walker (3%). Although most of these participants used a walking device due to their own determination with only a few of them using it according to medical prescription, their functional ability was significantly poorer than those who walked without a walking device (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Being unable to walk faster than 1 m/s and having a caregiver had the strongest relationship with the use of a walking device. The findings may be related to the study's locations. Being in a rural community of a developing country with a low level of education, participants may encounter some difficulty in accessing proper medical services. Therefore they used a device that could possibly help them to execute daily activities independently.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings may provide an insight into planning programmes for health monitoring and promotion, and medical services for community-dwelling elderly who live in a similar context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.11.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Walking devices used by community-dwelling elderly: Proportion, types, and associated factors\",\"authors\":\"Patcharawan Suwannarat PT, PhD Candidate , Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PT, PhD , Supapon Kaewsanmung PT, MSc , Lugkana Mato PT, PhD , Sugalya Amatachaya PT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Advancing age is likely to increase the requirement for walking devices. However, the existing evidence mostly involves all types of external devices used from participants in developed countries with or without medical problems. The findings may be different from the data on the use of walking devices exclusively, particularly for the elderly who live in a rural community of a developing country.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored the proportion, types, and factors associated with the use of walking devices in 343 elderly aged ≥ 65 years who live in a rural area of Thailand.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The participants were interviewed and assessed for their walking device used and functional mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data demonstrated that 74 participants (22%) used a walking device for mobility. Most of them used a modified walking stick (70%), followed by a standard single cane (27%), and a walker (3%). Although most of these participants used a walking device due to their own determination with only a few of them using it according to medical prescription, their functional ability was significantly poorer than those who walked without a walking device (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Being unable to walk faster than 1 m/s and having a caregiver had the strongest relationship with the use of a walking device. The findings may be related to the study's locations. Being in a rural community of a developing country with a low level of education, participants may encounter some difficulty in accessing proper medical services. Therefore they used a device that could possibly help them to execute daily activities independently.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings may provide an insight into planning programmes for health monitoring and promotion, and medical services for community-dwelling elderly who live in a similar context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 34-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702514000463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702514000463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Walking devices used by community-dwelling elderly: Proportion, types, and associated factors
Background
Advancing age is likely to increase the requirement for walking devices. However, the existing evidence mostly involves all types of external devices used from participants in developed countries with or without medical problems. The findings may be different from the data on the use of walking devices exclusively, particularly for the elderly who live in a rural community of a developing country.
Objective
This study explored the proportion, types, and factors associated with the use of walking devices in 343 elderly aged ≥ 65 years who live in a rural area of Thailand.
Methods
The participants were interviewed and assessed for their walking device used and functional mobility.
Results
The data demonstrated that 74 participants (22%) used a walking device for mobility. Most of them used a modified walking stick (70%), followed by a standard single cane (27%), and a walker (3%). Although most of these participants used a walking device due to their own determination with only a few of them using it according to medical prescription, their functional ability was significantly poorer than those who walked without a walking device (p < 0.05). Being unable to walk faster than 1 m/s and having a caregiver had the strongest relationship with the use of a walking device. The findings may be related to the study's locations. Being in a rural community of a developing country with a low level of education, participants may encounter some difficulty in accessing proper medical services. Therefore they used a device that could possibly help them to execute daily activities independently.
Conclusion
Our findings may provide an insight into planning programmes for health monitoring and promotion, and medical services for community-dwelling elderly who live in a similar context.
期刊介绍:
The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.