处理杨家庄子矿务局大型群体性安全事件

Luo Hongming
{"title":"处理杨家庄子矿务局大型群体性安全事件","authors":"Luo Hongming","doi":"10.1080/00094609.2019.1623576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Yangjiazhangzi Mining Bureau 40 km northwest of Huludao City is an enterprise directly under the Central Committee. It originally had 24,000 employees, of which 8,000 were retired, 8,000 were state-run and contract system workers, and 8,000 were collective employees. This mine is a hundred year-old mine, and after a hundred years of excavation, the mineral veins were exhausted. On October 8, 1999, with State Council approval, the Huludao City Intermediate People’s Court announced the official closure and bankruptcy of the Yangjiazhangzi Mining Bureau. Making reference to other announced mining policies, they set a policy of giving all full employees a base buyout compensation of 6,000 yuan plus the previous year’s local employee average monthly salary of 560 yuan times years of service, and giving all contract employees buyout compensation of the previous year’s local employee average monthly salary of 520 yuan times years of service with no 6,000 yuan base. After the mine closure and bankruptcy and announcement of the compensation method, employees of the mine continually made mass petitions at the Mining Bureau, City Party Committee, and City Government. The petitioning masses were made up of three types of people: all full employees, all contract workers, and retired employees with labor insurance, and they each had different demands. The fixed employees thought the one-time settlement fee was too low and wanted it increased, they demanded health insurance, and they demanded single child compensation fees. The contract workers wanted to receive the buyout compensation that the full employees received. The retired employees with labor insurance claimed they were seeking justice for their children. After November, 1999, some employees were not satisfied with the bankruptcy settlement policy determined by the state and made unreasonable requirements, setting off a series of mass petition incidents. During these, some petitioning masses engaged in behavior with excessive emotions, but the overall situation remained peaceful. After February, 2000, under the organization and planning of a small number of people with ulterior motives, troublemakers incited the masses, spread rumors, and caused disturbances, putting pressure on the government. On February 15, a small number of organizers and planners used a dispute between the Mining Bureau leaders and employees over the choice of location for their talks and the failure to hold the meeting on time to organize and incite more than 200 employees to take 11 medium-sized busses to petition at the Huludao City Government. The city leaders, Mining Bureau Director Yang Wentian, and Party Committee Secretary Li Jining jointly received the representatives of the petitioning employees. As the petitioners were not satisfied with the response to","PeriodicalId":39934,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law and Government","volume":"7 1","pages":"376 - 386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The handling of the yangjiazhangzi mining bureau large mass security incident\",\"authors\":\"Luo Hongming\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00094609.2019.1623576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Yangjiazhangzi Mining Bureau 40 km northwest of Huludao City is an enterprise directly under the Central Committee. It originally had 24,000 employees, of which 8,000 were retired, 8,000 were state-run and contract system workers, and 8,000 were collective employees. This mine is a hundred year-old mine, and after a hundred years of excavation, the mineral veins were exhausted. On October 8, 1999, with State Council approval, the Huludao City Intermediate People’s Court announced the official closure and bankruptcy of the Yangjiazhangzi Mining Bureau. Making reference to other announced mining policies, they set a policy of giving all full employees a base buyout compensation of 6,000 yuan plus the previous year’s local employee average monthly salary of 560 yuan times years of service, and giving all contract employees buyout compensation of the previous year’s local employee average monthly salary of 520 yuan times years of service with no 6,000 yuan base. After the mine closure and bankruptcy and announcement of the compensation method, employees of the mine continually made mass petitions at the Mining Bureau, City Party Committee, and City Government. The petitioning masses were made up of three types of people: all full employees, all contract workers, and retired employees with labor insurance, and they each had different demands. The fixed employees thought the one-time settlement fee was too low and wanted it increased, they demanded health insurance, and they demanded single child compensation fees. The contract workers wanted to receive the buyout compensation that the full employees received. The retired employees with labor insurance claimed they were seeking justice for their children. After November, 1999, some employees were not satisfied with the bankruptcy settlement policy determined by the state and made unreasonable requirements, setting off a series of mass petition incidents. During these, some petitioning masses engaged in behavior with excessive emotions, but the overall situation remained peaceful. After February, 2000, under the organization and planning of a small number of people with ulterior motives, troublemakers incited the masses, spread rumors, and caused disturbances, putting pressure on the government. On February 15, a small number of organizers and planners used a dispute between the Mining Bureau leaders and employees over the choice of location for their talks and the failure to hold the meeting on time to organize and incite more than 200 employees to take 11 medium-sized busses to petition at the Huludao City Government. The city leaders, Mining Bureau Director Yang Wentian, and Party Committee Secretary Li Jining jointly received the representatives of the petitioning employees. As the petitioners were not satisfied with the response to\",\"PeriodicalId\":39934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Law and Government\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"376 - 386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Law and Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00094609.2019.1623576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law and Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00094609.2019.1623576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

位于葫芦岛市西北40公里处的杨家庄子矿务局是中央直属企业。原来有2.4万名职工,其中退休职工8000人,国营及合同制职工8000人,集体职工8000人。这是一座百年矿山,经过百年的挖掘,矿脉已经枯竭。1999年10月8日,经国务院批准,葫芦岛市中级人民法院宣布杨家庄子矿业局正式关闭破产。参照其他已公布的矿业政策,规定全体正式职工基本买断补偿金为6000元,加上上一年本地职工月平均工资560元乘以工龄;合同制职工基本买断补偿金为上一年本地职工月平均工资520元乘以工龄,不设6000元基数。在该矿关闭破产并公布赔偿办法后,该矿职工不断向矿务局、市委、市政府进行群众上访。信访群众由三种类型的人组成:全职工、全合同工和有劳动保险的退休职工,他们有不同的诉求。固定员工认为一次性安置费太低,希望增加,他们要求健康保险,他们要求独生子女补偿费。合同工希望得到正式员工所得到的买断补偿。这些有劳动保险的退休员工声称,他们是在为自己的孩子讨回公道。1999年11月以后,部分职工对国家确定的破产和解政策不满,提出不合理要求,引发了一系列群体性信访事件。期间,部分上访群众情绪过激,但总体保持平静。2000年2月以后,在少数别有用心的人的组织策划下,闹事分子煽动群众,造谣惑众,制造事端,给政府施加压力。2月15日,少数组织者和策划者利用矿务局领导和员工在谈判地点选择和会议未能按时举行的争执,组织并煽动200多名员工乘坐11辆中型客车到葫芦岛市政府请愿。市领导、矿务局局长杨闻天、市委书记李吉宁共同接见了上访职工代表。由于上访者对答复不满意
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The handling of the yangjiazhangzi mining bureau large mass security incident
The Yangjiazhangzi Mining Bureau 40 km northwest of Huludao City is an enterprise directly under the Central Committee. It originally had 24,000 employees, of which 8,000 were retired, 8,000 were state-run and contract system workers, and 8,000 were collective employees. This mine is a hundred year-old mine, and after a hundred years of excavation, the mineral veins were exhausted. On October 8, 1999, with State Council approval, the Huludao City Intermediate People’s Court announced the official closure and bankruptcy of the Yangjiazhangzi Mining Bureau. Making reference to other announced mining policies, they set a policy of giving all full employees a base buyout compensation of 6,000 yuan plus the previous year’s local employee average monthly salary of 560 yuan times years of service, and giving all contract employees buyout compensation of the previous year’s local employee average monthly salary of 520 yuan times years of service with no 6,000 yuan base. After the mine closure and bankruptcy and announcement of the compensation method, employees of the mine continually made mass petitions at the Mining Bureau, City Party Committee, and City Government. The petitioning masses were made up of three types of people: all full employees, all contract workers, and retired employees with labor insurance, and they each had different demands. The fixed employees thought the one-time settlement fee was too low and wanted it increased, they demanded health insurance, and they demanded single child compensation fees. The contract workers wanted to receive the buyout compensation that the full employees received. The retired employees with labor insurance claimed they were seeking justice for their children. After November, 1999, some employees were not satisfied with the bankruptcy settlement policy determined by the state and made unreasonable requirements, setting off a series of mass petition incidents. During these, some petitioning masses engaged in behavior with excessive emotions, but the overall situation remained peaceful. After February, 2000, under the organization and planning of a small number of people with ulterior motives, troublemakers incited the masses, spread rumors, and caused disturbances, putting pressure on the government. On February 15, a small number of organizers and planners used a dispute between the Mining Bureau leaders and employees over the choice of location for their talks and the failure to hold the meeting on time to organize and incite more than 200 employees to take 11 medium-sized busses to petition at the Huludao City Government. The city leaders, Mining Bureau Director Yang Wentian, and Party Committee Secretary Li Jining jointly received the representatives of the petitioning employees. As the petitioners were not satisfied with the response to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Law and Government
Chinese Law and Government Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Chinese Law and Government offers a rare window on the inner workings of Chinese politics and governance through careful selection, translation, and annotation of primary documents, analytical studies, and other authoritative sources. The materials translated for publication in the journal"s thematic issues and series may be laws, regulations, court records, policy directives, and published or unpublished, official or scholarly reports and analyses of critical questions. Insight into the significance of the topic and the content of each issue is provided in a substantive introduction by the editor or expert guest editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信