用非线性材料模型确定加筋粉煤灰混凝土柱的阻力

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
V. Dang, Vongchith Sykhampha, Truong-Thang Nguyen
{"title":"用非线性材料模型确定加筋粉煤灰混凝土柱的阻力","authors":"V. Dang, Vongchith Sykhampha, Truong-Thang Nguyen","doi":"10.3311/ppci.20626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces experimental and analytical studies on the resistance under eccentric loads of reinforced fly ash concrete (RFAC) columns, in which fly ash (FA) is used to partially replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with a by-mass ratio of 20%. Based on experimental results of concrete specimens with mean 28-day cylinder strength of 30 MPa, modifications on simplified bi-linear and tri-linear models of stress-strain relationships of OPC concrete specified in the Russian and Vietnamese design standards are proposed. These nonlinear deformation models are incorporated into an analytical approach to establish the resistance of RFAC columns in the form of interaction surface, associated with an assessment method for safety factor based on the principle of inverse distance weighted average (IDWA). Parameters of the proposed analytical approach are determined by test results obtained from eight RFAC column specimens having 150 × 200 (mm) rectangular cross-section, 1600 mm-height, and 4Φ14 longitudinal rebars with yield strength of 362.6 MPa. In the tests, the specimens were loaded with uniaxial eccentricities ranging from 0 to 80 mm until failed. It is shown that with ε’b1 = 0.0022 and kE = 0.91, the corresponding safety factors of bi-linear and tri-linear models validated for the tested specimens are conservative and nearest to unity, proving that the proposed analytical approach is capable of closely predicting the RFAC columns’ resistance.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Reinforced Fly Ash Concrete Columns’ Resistance Using Nonlinear Models of Materials\",\"authors\":\"V. Dang, Vongchith Sykhampha, Truong-Thang Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.3311/ppci.20626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article introduces experimental and analytical studies on the resistance under eccentric loads of reinforced fly ash concrete (RFAC) columns, in which fly ash (FA) is used to partially replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with a by-mass ratio of 20%. Based on experimental results of concrete specimens with mean 28-day cylinder strength of 30 MPa, modifications on simplified bi-linear and tri-linear models of stress-strain relationships of OPC concrete specified in the Russian and Vietnamese design standards are proposed. These nonlinear deformation models are incorporated into an analytical approach to establish the resistance of RFAC columns in the form of interaction surface, associated with an assessment method for safety factor based on the principle of inverse distance weighted average (IDWA). Parameters of the proposed analytical approach are determined by test results obtained from eight RFAC column specimens having 150 × 200 (mm) rectangular cross-section, 1600 mm-height, and 4Φ14 longitudinal rebars with yield strength of 362.6 MPa. In the tests, the specimens were loaded with uniaxial eccentricities ranging from 0 to 80 mm until failed. It is shown that with ε’b1 = 0.0022 and kE = 0.91, the corresponding safety factors of bi-linear and tri-linear models validated for the tested specimens are conservative and nearest to unity, proving that the proposed analytical approach is capable of closely predicting the RFAC columns’ resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppci.20626\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppci.20626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了用粉煤灰(FA)部分替代普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)(质量比为20%)的增强粉煤灰混凝土(RFAC)柱在偏心荷载作用下的阻力试验和分析研究。基于平均28天柱强度为30 MPa的混凝土试件试验结果,对俄罗斯和越南设计标准中规定的OPC混凝土应力-应变关系简化双线和三线模型进行了修正。将这些非线性变形模型结合到以相互作用面形式建立RFAC柱抗力的解析方法中,并结合基于反距离加权平均(IDWA)原理的安全系数评估方法。采用矩形截面为150 × 200 (mm),高度为1600 mm,纵向钢筋为4Φ14,屈服强度为362.6 MPa的8个RFAC柱试件的试验结果确定了分析方法的参数。在试验中,试件被加载在0 ~ 80mm的单轴偏心率范围内,直到失效。结果表明,当ε ' b1 = 0.0022, kE = 0.91时,验证的双线性和三线性模型的安全系数是保守的且最接近统一的,表明该分析方法能够较好地预测RFAC柱的阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Reinforced Fly Ash Concrete Columns’ Resistance Using Nonlinear Models of Materials
This article introduces experimental and analytical studies on the resistance under eccentric loads of reinforced fly ash concrete (RFAC) columns, in which fly ash (FA) is used to partially replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with a by-mass ratio of 20%. Based on experimental results of concrete specimens with mean 28-day cylinder strength of 30 MPa, modifications on simplified bi-linear and tri-linear models of stress-strain relationships of OPC concrete specified in the Russian and Vietnamese design standards are proposed. These nonlinear deformation models are incorporated into an analytical approach to establish the resistance of RFAC columns in the form of interaction surface, associated with an assessment method for safety factor based on the principle of inverse distance weighted average (IDWA). Parameters of the proposed analytical approach are determined by test results obtained from eight RFAC column specimens having 150 × 200 (mm) rectangular cross-section, 1600 mm-height, and 4Φ14 longitudinal rebars with yield strength of 362.6 MPa. In the tests, the specimens were loaded with uniaxial eccentricities ranging from 0 to 80 mm until failed. It is shown that with ε’b1 = 0.0022 and kE = 0.91, the corresponding safety factors of bi-linear and tri-linear models validated for the tested specimens are conservative and nearest to unity, proving that the proposed analytical approach is capable of closely predicting the RFAC columns’ resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信