{"title":"艾略特和庞德的现代主义、通货膨胀和金本位","authors":"D. Hawkes","doi":"10.3366/mod.2021.0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The great inflation of the 1920s had a dramatic effect on Anglophone literary modernism. Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway all recognized that financial signs had come unmoored from any objective reference, and their work explores the literary implications of representation's newly autonomous, performative power. Pound blamed the economic and cultural crisis on ‘usury.’ Following Aristotle, he conceived of usury as the unnatural reproduction of autonomous representation, and thus as the antithesis of natural sexual and semiotic fertility. He particularly deplored the historical role played by Samuel Loyd, the Victorian head of Lloyds Bank, who had cunningly manipulated the gold standard in order to give control of the economy to ‘usurers.’ In his financial journalism for Lloyds Bank Monthly, Eliot used the gold standard as an economic logos in order to facilitate usury. Pound saw that Eliot's theory of the ‘objective correlative’ was incompatible with the referential model of representation assumed by the gold standard.","PeriodicalId":41937,"journal":{"name":"Modernist Cultures","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modernism, Inflation and the Gold Standard in T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound\",\"authors\":\"D. Hawkes\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/mod.2021.0337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The great inflation of the 1920s had a dramatic effect on Anglophone literary modernism. Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway all recognized that financial signs had come unmoored from any objective reference, and their work explores the literary implications of representation's newly autonomous, performative power. Pound blamed the economic and cultural crisis on ‘usury.’ Following Aristotle, he conceived of usury as the unnatural reproduction of autonomous representation, and thus as the antithesis of natural sexual and semiotic fertility. He particularly deplored the historical role played by Samuel Loyd, the Victorian head of Lloyds Bank, who had cunningly manipulated the gold standard in order to give control of the economy to ‘usurers.’ In his financial journalism for Lloyds Bank Monthly, Eliot used the gold standard as an economic logos in order to facilitate usury. Pound saw that Eliot's theory of the ‘objective correlative’ was incompatible with the referential model of representation assumed by the gold standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modernist Cultures\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modernist Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2021.0337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernist Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2021.0337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
20世纪20年代的通货膨胀对英语文学的现代主义产生了巨大的影响。庞德(Ezra Pound)、艾略特(T.S. Eliot)和海明威(Ernest Hemingway)都认识到,经济迹象已经脱离了任何客观参考,他们的作品探索了再现的新自主、表演力量的文学含义。庞德将经济和文化危机归咎于“高利贷”。继亚里士多德之后,他认为高利贷是自主再现的非自然再生产,因此是自然性和符号学生育的对立面。他特别谴责维多利亚时代劳埃德银行(Lloyds Bank)行长塞缪尔•劳埃德(Samuel lloyd)在历史上所扮演的角色,后者狡猾地操纵金本位,以便将经济控制权交给“高利贷者”。在他为《劳埃德银行月刊》(Lloyds Bank Monthly)撰写的金融新闻中,艾略特将金本位作为一种经济标志,以促进高利贷。庞德看到艾略特的“客观关联”理论与金本位所假定的表征的参照模型是不相容的。
Modernism, Inflation and the Gold Standard in T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound
The great inflation of the 1920s had a dramatic effect on Anglophone literary modernism. Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway all recognized that financial signs had come unmoored from any objective reference, and their work explores the literary implications of representation's newly autonomous, performative power. Pound blamed the economic and cultural crisis on ‘usury.’ Following Aristotle, he conceived of usury as the unnatural reproduction of autonomous representation, and thus as the antithesis of natural sexual and semiotic fertility. He particularly deplored the historical role played by Samuel Loyd, the Victorian head of Lloyds Bank, who had cunningly manipulated the gold standard in order to give control of the economy to ‘usurers.’ In his financial journalism for Lloyds Bank Monthly, Eliot used the gold standard as an economic logos in order to facilitate usury. Pound saw that Eliot's theory of the ‘objective correlative’ was incompatible with the referential model of representation assumed by the gold standard.