提高临床医生和护士对医院异常生命体征的反应:改进预警评分系统和快速反应系统的作用

O. Akanbi, D. Onilede, M. Adeoti, O. Olakulehin, N. Idowu, O. Olanipekun
{"title":"提高临床医生和护士对医院异常生命体征的反应:改进预警评分系统和快速反应系统的作用","authors":"O. Akanbi, D. Onilede, M. Adeoti, O. Olakulehin, N. Idowu, O. Olanipekun","doi":"10.9734/bjmmr/2017/32370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most adverse events in hospitalised patients are often preceded by documented progressive deterioration of physiological parameters without appropriate responses. Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is a simple physiological score that was developed to aid early recognition of patient at risk of deterioration and assist in timely response especially in low and middle income countries where nurse patients ratio is low. Aim: To determine nurses’ and clinicians’ responses to abnormal vital signs and to evaluate the usefulness of MEWS in early recognition of patients at risk of adverse outcome Methodology: This was a retrospective case-control study reviewed case notes of 264 patients discharged alive and 243 patients who died in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso. The Patients’ relevant data and vital signs were gotten from case notes and were used to calculate Mean MEWS for each patient over 72 hours preceding outcome. Results: One hundred and fourteen (79.72%) of 143 patients with MEWS of above six were classified to be critically ill and managed in general wards instead of higher care unit. Mean MEWS among the patients discharged alive was statistically significantly lower than the dead patients (2.7±0.7 vs. 8.0±2.6, P <.001). Mean MEWS for pulse rate (0.2±0.63 vs. 2.1±1.0 P <.001) and respiratory rate (1.2±0.01 vs. 2.3±0.75, P <.001) were statistical significantly lower for the patients discharged alive. The main reason for calling attention of clinicians to deteriorating patients was gasping in 52.6% of cases which is a late sign. Responses of house officers when called upon to review critically ill patients were to inform registrars in 44.03% of cases. There was a mean delay of 131(±66.28) minutes between house officers’ review and consultants’ inputs. Conclusion: Our study showed poor response to patients’ abnormal vital signs and significant delay in nurses’ and clinicians’ responses and decision making process; we thus suggest use of MEWS and introduction of rapid response system to aid early recognition and activation of clinicians with core competence in management of at risk patients.","PeriodicalId":9249,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medicine and medical research","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Clinicians’ and Nurses’ Response to Abnormal Vital Signs in Hospital: The Roles of Modified Early Warning Scoring System and Rapid Response System\",\"authors\":\"O. Akanbi, D. Onilede, M. Adeoti, O. Olakulehin, N. Idowu, O. Olanipekun\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bjmmr/2017/32370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Most adverse events in hospitalised patients are often preceded by documented progressive deterioration of physiological parameters without appropriate responses. Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is a simple physiological score that was developed to aid early recognition of patient at risk of deterioration and assist in timely response especially in low and middle income countries where nurse patients ratio is low. Aim: To determine nurses’ and clinicians’ responses to abnormal vital signs and to evaluate the usefulness of MEWS in early recognition of patients at risk of adverse outcome Methodology: This was a retrospective case-control study reviewed case notes of 264 patients discharged alive and 243 patients who died in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso. The Patients’ relevant data and vital signs were gotten from case notes and were used to calculate Mean MEWS for each patient over 72 hours preceding outcome. Results: One hundred and fourteen (79.72%) of 143 patients with MEWS of above six were classified to be critically ill and managed in general wards instead of higher care unit. Mean MEWS among the patients discharged alive was statistically significantly lower than the dead patients (2.7±0.7 vs. 8.0±2.6, P <.001). Mean MEWS for pulse rate (0.2±0.63 vs. 2.1±1.0 P <.001) and respiratory rate (1.2±0.01 vs. 2.3±0.75, P <.001) were statistical significantly lower for the patients discharged alive. The main reason for calling attention of clinicians to deteriorating patients was gasping in 52.6% of cases which is a late sign. Responses of house officers when called upon to review critically ill patients were to inform registrars in 44.03% of cases. There was a mean delay of 131(±66.28) minutes between house officers’ review and consultants’ inputs. Conclusion: Our study showed poor response to patients’ abnormal vital signs and significant delay in nurses’ and clinicians’ responses and decision making process; we thus suggest use of MEWS and introduction of rapid response system to aid early recognition and activation of clinicians with core competence in management of at risk patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of medicine and medical research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of medicine and medical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bjmmr/2017/32370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medicine and medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bjmmr/2017/32370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:住院患者的大多数不良事件通常发生在记录的生理参数进行性恶化之前,而没有适当的反应。修订早期预警评分(MEWS)是一种简单的生理评分,旨在帮助早期识别有恶化风险的患者,并帮助及时应对,特别是在护士患者比例较低的中低收入国家。目的:确定护士和临床医生对异常生命体征的反应,并评估MEWS在早期识别有不良结局风险的患者中的作用。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,回顾了Ladoke Akintola Technology University of Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso的264例存活出院患者和243例死亡患者的病例记录。患者的相关数据和生命体征从病例记录中获取,并用于计算结果前72小时每位患者的平均MEWS。结果:143例6级以上的MEWS患者中,有114例(79.72%)被归为重症,在普通病房而非高级监护病房进行管理。存活出院患者平均MEWS低于死亡患者(2.7±0.7∶8.0±2.6,P < 0.001)。存活出院患者脉搏率(0.2±0.63 vs. 2.1±1.0 P < 0.001)和呼吸率(1.2±0.01 vs. 2.3±0.75,P < 0.001)的平均MEWS均显著低于存活出院患者。病情恶化患者引起临床医生注意的主要原因是喘息,占52.6%,为晚期体征。在44.03%的个案中,院舍主任在被要求覆检危重病人时,会通知登记员。在院务人员的审查和顾问的输入之间,平均延迟了131(±66.28)分钟。结论:我们的研究表明,对患者生命体征异常的反应较差,护士和临床医生的反应和决策过程明显滞后;因此,我们建议使用MEWS和引入快速反应系统,以帮助早期识别和激活具有管理高危患者核心能力的临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Clinicians’ and Nurses’ Response to Abnormal Vital Signs in Hospital: The Roles of Modified Early Warning Scoring System and Rapid Response System
Background: Most adverse events in hospitalised patients are often preceded by documented progressive deterioration of physiological parameters without appropriate responses. Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is a simple physiological score that was developed to aid early recognition of patient at risk of deterioration and assist in timely response especially in low and middle income countries where nurse patients ratio is low. Aim: To determine nurses’ and clinicians’ responses to abnormal vital signs and to evaluate the usefulness of MEWS in early recognition of patients at risk of adverse outcome Methodology: This was a retrospective case-control study reviewed case notes of 264 patients discharged alive and 243 patients who died in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso. The Patients’ relevant data and vital signs were gotten from case notes and were used to calculate Mean MEWS for each patient over 72 hours preceding outcome. Results: One hundred and fourteen (79.72%) of 143 patients with MEWS of above six were classified to be critically ill and managed in general wards instead of higher care unit. Mean MEWS among the patients discharged alive was statistically significantly lower than the dead patients (2.7±0.7 vs. 8.0±2.6, P <.001). Mean MEWS for pulse rate (0.2±0.63 vs. 2.1±1.0 P <.001) and respiratory rate (1.2±0.01 vs. 2.3±0.75, P <.001) were statistical significantly lower for the patients discharged alive. The main reason for calling attention of clinicians to deteriorating patients was gasping in 52.6% of cases which is a late sign. Responses of house officers when called upon to review critically ill patients were to inform registrars in 44.03% of cases. There was a mean delay of 131(±66.28) minutes between house officers’ review and consultants’ inputs. Conclusion: Our study showed poor response to patients’ abnormal vital signs and significant delay in nurses’ and clinicians’ responses and decision making process; we thus suggest use of MEWS and introduction of rapid response system to aid early recognition and activation of clinicians with core competence in management of at risk patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信