哪种输入语言是高级合成(HLS)的最佳选择?

D. Gajski, T. Austin, Steve Svoboda
{"title":"哪种输入语言是高级合成(HLS)的最佳选择?","authors":"D. Gajski, T. Austin, Steve Svoboda","doi":"10.1145/1837274.1837489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As of 2010, over 30 of the world's top semiconductor / systems companies have adopted HLS. In 2009, SOCs tape-outs containing IPs developed using HLS exceeded 50 for the first time. Now that the practicality and value of HLS is established, engineers are turning to the question of “what input-language works best?” The answer is critical because it drives key decisions regarding the tool/methodology infrastructure companies will create around this new flow. ANSI-C/C++ advocates cite ease-of-learning, simulation speed. SystemC advocates make similar claims, and point to SystemC's hardware-oriented features. Proponents of BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog) claim that language enhances architectural transparency and control. To maximize the benefits of HLS, companies must consider many factors and tradeoffs.","PeriodicalId":87346,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"857-858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What input-language is the best choice for high level synthesis (HLS)?\",\"authors\":\"D. Gajski, T. Austin, Steve Svoboda\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1837274.1837489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As of 2010, over 30 of the world's top semiconductor / systems companies have adopted HLS. In 2009, SOCs tape-outs containing IPs developed using HLS exceeded 50 for the first time. Now that the practicality and value of HLS is established, engineers are turning to the question of “what input-language works best?” The answer is critical because it drives key decisions regarding the tool/methodology infrastructure companies will create around this new flow. ANSI-C/C++ advocates cite ease-of-learning, simulation speed. SystemC advocates make similar claims, and point to SystemC's hardware-oriented features. Proponents of BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog) claim that language enhances architectural transparency and control. To maximize the benefits of HLS, companies must consider many factors and tradeoffs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"857-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

截至2010年,超过30家世界顶级半导体/系统公司采用了HLS。2009年,使用HLS开发的包含ip的soc带出量首次超过50个。既然HLS的实用性和价值已经确立,工程师们正在转向“哪种输入语言效果最好?”这个问题的答案是至关重要的,因为它推动了公司围绕这个新流程创建的工具/方法基础设施的关键决策。ANSI-C/ c++的倡导者引用了易于学习,模拟速度快。SystemC的拥护者也提出了类似的主张,并指出了SystemC面向硬件的特性。BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog)的支持者声称语言增强了架构的透明性和控制力。为了使HLS的效益最大化,公司必须考虑许多因素和权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What input-language is the best choice for high level synthesis (HLS)?
As of 2010, over 30 of the world's top semiconductor / systems companies have adopted HLS. In 2009, SOCs tape-outs containing IPs developed using HLS exceeded 50 for the first time. Now that the practicality and value of HLS is established, engineers are turning to the question of “what input-language works best?” The answer is critical because it drives key decisions regarding the tool/methodology infrastructure companies will create around this new flow. ANSI-C/C++ advocates cite ease-of-learning, simulation speed. SystemC advocates make similar claims, and point to SystemC's hardware-oriented features. Proponents of BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog) claim that language enhances architectural transparency and control. To maximize the benefits of HLS, companies must consider many factors and tradeoffs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信