N. Starciuc, N. Osadci, I. Petcu, Nicolae Malancea, Xenia Bordos, Victor Ungureanu
{"title":"牛场各种消毒剂使用效率的比较","authors":"N. Starciuc, N. Osadci, I. Petcu, Nicolae Malancea, Xenia Bordos, Victor Ungureanu","doi":"10.2478/alife-2018-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The investigations were aimed to establish the comparative efficiency of four disinfectants (Aquadez, Ecocide S, Virocide and Na OH) used for the disinfection of cattle farm of State Agrarian University of Moldova. According to the classical methodology, the disinfectants have been used in concentrations which were recommended by the producers. Following this, lavages were collected from different supports and equipment of the cattle farm before sparing of the disinfectants and one hour after the contact of the disinfectants with the substrates. In this context samples were taken from places as the feeding space for animals and the rest area, cows’ milking rooms and the milk collection rooms. Afterwards, the samples have been inseminated in laboratory conditions for establishing the afterwards disinfecting effect on the farm. As a result, the microbiological investigation demonstrated that concentrations which were recommended by the producers and double concentrations of disinfectants don’t have satisfactory 100% of the anti-microbial and antifungal effect. For all disinfected places with the mentioned disinfectants colonies of microorganisms grew on nutrient media, especially bacterial forms as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and microscopic fungal. Following comparisons, Ecocide S 3% and Na OH 3% had a higher efficiency than Aquadez 3%. The after application effect of Aquadez 3% established the presence of Salmonella, E. coli colonies grown on nutrient media as well as, Streptococcus and microscopic fungal.","PeriodicalId":6413,"journal":{"name":"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings","volume":"28 1","pages":"485 - 489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficiency of Various Disinfectants Used in the Cattle Farm\",\"authors\":\"N. Starciuc, N. Osadci, I. Petcu, Nicolae Malancea, Xenia Bordos, Victor Ungureanu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/alife-2018-0076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The investigations were aimed to establish the comparative efficiency of four disinfectants (Aquadez, Ecocide S, Virocide and Na OH) used for the disinfection of cattle farm of State Agrarian University of Moldova. According to the classical methodology, the disinfectants have been used in concentrations which were recommended by the producers. Following this, lavages were collected from different supports and equipment of the cattle farm before sparing of the disinfectants and one hour after the contact of the disinfectants with the substrates. In this context samples were taken from places as the feeding space for animals and the rest area, cows’ milking rooms and the milk collection rooms. Afterwards, the samples have been inseminated in laboratory conditions for establishing the afterwards disinfecting effect on the farm. As a result, the microbiological investigation demonstrated that concentrations which were recommended by the producers and double concentrations of disinfectants don’t have satisfactory 100% of the anti-microbial and antifungal effect. For all disinfected places with the mentioned disinfectants colonies of microorganisms grew on nutrient media, especially bacterial forms as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and microscopic fungal. Following comparisons, Ecocide S 3% and Na OH 3% had a higher efficiency than Aquadez 3%. The after application effect of Aquadez 3% established the presence of Salmonella, E. coli colonies grown on nutrient media as well as, Streptococcus and microscopic fungal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"485 - 489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/alife-2018-0076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/alife-2018-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究旨在探讨四种消毒剂(Aquadez、Ecocide S、Virocide和Na OH)在摩尔多瓦国立农业大学牛场的消毒效果。根据传统的方法,消毒剂的使用浓度是生产者建议的。随后,在保留消毒剂之前和消毒剂与基质接触后1小时,从牛场的不同支架和设备上收集洗液。在这种情况下,样本取自动物喂养空间和休息区,奶牛挤奶室和收集牛奶的房间。然后,在实验室条件下对样品进行人工授精,以确定农场的事后消毒效果。结果,微生物学调查表明,生产厂家推荐浓度和双浓度消毒剂不能达到100%的抑菌抑菌效果。在所有用上述消毒剂消毒的地方,微生物菌落在营养培养基上生长,特别是细菌形式,如链球菌、葡萄球菌和微观真菌。经过比较,Ecocide S 3%和naoh 3%的效率高于Aquadez 3%。3% Aquadez施用后的效果确定了在营养培养基上生长的沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌菌落以及链球菌和微生物真菌的存在。
Comparative Efficiency of Various Disinfectants Used in the Cattle Farm
Abstract The investigations were aimed to establish the comparative efficiency of four disinfectants (Aquadez, Ecocide S, Virocide and Na OH) used for the disinfection of cattle farm of State Agrarian University of Moldova. According to the classical methodology, the disinfectants have been used in concentrations which were recommended by the producers. Following this, lavages were collected from different supports and equipment of the cattle farm before sparing of the disinfectants and one hour after the contact of the disinfectants with the substrates. In this context samples were taken from places as the feeding space for animals and the rest area, cows’ milking rooms and the milk collection rooms. Afterwards, the samples have been inseminated in laboratory conditions for establishing the afterwards disinfecting effect on the farm. As a result, the microbiological investigation demonstrated that concentrations which were recommended by the producers and double concentrations of disinfectants don’t have satisfactory 100% of the anti-microbial and antifungal effect. For all disinfected places with the mentioned disinfectants colonies of microorganisms grew on nutrient media, especially bacterial forms as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and microscopic fungal. Following comparisons, Ecocide S 3% and Na OH 3% had a higher efficiency than Aquadez 3%. The after application effect of Aquadez 3% established the presence of Salmonella, E. coli colonies grown on nutrient media as well as, Streptococcus and microscopic fungal.