Zhaoshuang Zhong, Long Zhao, Kaiming Chen, Shuyue Xia
{"title":"超声引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性全闭塞患者的临床效果:meta分析","authors":"Zhaoshuang Zhong, Long Zhao, Kaiming Chen, Shuyue Xia","doi":"10.1155/2022/4170060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The clinical effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remain unclear. Methods We identified all full-text published studies that compared the effects of IVUS-guided CTO-PCI with angiography-guided CTO-PCI by searching electric databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science from the establishment to Nov 2021. There was no language limitation. The endpoints included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results Five studies involving a total of 2320 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to the angiography-guided group, IVUS-guided PCI showed no significant reduction in the incidence of MACE (I2 = 27.4%, P = 0.239; RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.765 to 1.128, P = 0.457), cardiac death (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.459; RR 0.574, 95% CI 0.299 to 1.103, P = 0.096), all-cause death (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.964; RR 0.677, 95% CI 0.395 to 1.163, P = 0.158), MI (I2 = 46.7%, P = 0.131; RR0.836, 95% CI 0.508 to 1.377, P = 0.482), and TVR (I2 = 21.2%, P = 0.279; RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.679 to 1.272, P = 0.648). Conclusions IVUS-guided PCI demonstrated no significant benefit on MACE, cardiac death, all-cause death, MI, and TVR in patients with CTO lesions. However, given the study's limitations, additional high-quality RCTs are needed.","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoshuang Zhong, Long Zhao, Kaiming Chen, Shuyue Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/4170060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The clinical effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remain unclear. Methods We identified all full-text published studies that compared the effects of IVUS-guided CTO-PCI with angiography-guided CTO-PCI by searching electric databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science from the establishment to Nov 2021. There was no language limitation. The endpoints included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results Five studies involving a total of 2320 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to the angiography-guided group, IVUS-guided PCI showed no significant reduction in the incidence of MACE (I2 = 27.4%, P = 0.239; RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.765 to 1.128, P = 0.457), cardiac death (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.459; RR 0.574, 95% CI 0.299 to 1.103, P = 0.096), all-cause death (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.964; RR 0.677, 95% CI 0.395 to 1.163, P = 0.158), MI (I2 = 46.7%, P = 0.131; RR0.836, 95% CI 0.508 to 1.377, P = 0.482), and TVR (I2 = 21.2%, P = 0.279; RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.679 to 1.272, P = 0.648). Conclusions IVUS-guided PCI demonstrated no significant benefit on MACE, cardiac death, all-cause death, MI, and TVR in patients with CTO lesions. However, given the study's limitations, additional high-quality RCTs are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4170060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4170060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景血管内超声(IVUS)引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗慢性全闭塞(CTO)病变的临床效果尚不清楚。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和ISI Web of Science等电子数据库,从建立到2021年11月,我们确定了所有已发表的比较ivus引导下CTO-PCI与血管造影引导下CTO-PCI效果的全文研究。没有语言限制。终点包括主要心脏不良事件(MACE)、心源性死亡、全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管重建术(TVR)的发生率。结果本meta分析纳入了5项研究,共涉及2320例患者。与血管造影引导组相比,ivus引导下PCI的MACE发生率无显著降低(I2 = 27.4%, P = 0.239;RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.765 ~ 1.128, P = 0.457),心源性死亡(I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.459;RR 0.574, 95% CI 0.299 ~ 1.103, P = 0.096),全因死亡(I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.964;相对危险度0.677,95%可信区间0.395到1.163,P = 0.158), MI (I2 = 46.7%, P = 0.131;RR0.836, 95%可信区间0.508到1.377,P = 0.482), TVR (I2 = 21.2%, P = 0.279;RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.679 ~ 1.272, P = 0.648)。结论ivus引导下的PCI对CTO病变患者的MACE、心源性死亡、全因死亡、MI和TVR无显著益处。然而,考虑到研究的局限性,需要更多高质量的随机对照试验。
The Clinical Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis
Background The clinical effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remain unclear. Methods We identified all full-text published studies that compared the effects of IVUS-guided CTO-PCI with angiography-guided CTO-PCI by searching electric databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science from the establishment to Nov 2021. There was no language limitation. The endpoints included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results Five studies involving a total of 2320 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to the angiography-guided group, IVUS-guided PCI showed no significant reduction in the incidence of MACE (I2 = 27.4%, P = 0.239; RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.765 to 1.128, P = 0.457), cardiac death (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.459; RR 0.574, 95% CI 0.299 to 1.103, P = 0.096), all-cause death (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.964; RR 0.677, 95% CI 0.395 to 1.163, P = 0.158), MI (I2 = 46.7%, P = 0.131; RR0.836, 95% CI 0.508 to 1.377, P = 0.482), and TVR (I2 = 21.2%, P = 0.279; RR 0.929, 95% CI 0.679 to 1.272, P = 0.648). Conclusions IVUS-guided PCI demonstrated no significant benefit on MACE, cardiac death, all-cause death, MI, and TVR in patients with CTO lesions. However, given the study's limitations, additional high-quality RCTs are needed.
期刊介绍:
Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.