j·埃德加·胡佛去看电影:联邦调查局和好莱坞黄金战争的起源

IF 0.2 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
T. Osborne
{"title":"j·埃德加·胡佛去看电影:联邦调查局和好莱坞黄金战争的起源","authors":"T. Osborne","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-0770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Sbardellati J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies: The FBI and the Origins of Hollywood's Gold War Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2012. 256 pp. Hard CoverIf once-secret FBI files are any gauge, Hollywood's propagation of Communist doctrine was more cunning and pervasive than imagined. Vigilant FBI agents and informants detected the taint of Communism everywhere-in such disparate pictures as Warner Brothers' Pride of the Marines (1945), Walt Disney's Alice in Wonderland (1951), and Paramount's Roman Holiday (1953). But the FBI found few pictures more insidiously Marxist than Universal's Buck Privates Gome Home (1947). While the Abbott and Costello vehicle seemed a \"rather inoculous [sic] film,\" its true intent, the surveillance report stated, was to raise the specter of \"class consciousness.\" This sinister purpose, explained the report, was effected by crosscutting between a general's party and a buck private on KP duty. In such fashion did FBI surveillance merge into film theory and criticism.As John Sbardellati's J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies details, the Bureau unwittingly began nibbling at the edges of media theory in the silent era while monitoring movies for \"radicalism.\" Although that first Red Scare faded, J. Edgar's Hoover's fears never abated. Rather, they so intensified during World War II that Hoover launched a sweeping secret investigation of Hollywood that lasted from 1942 to 1958. J. Edgar Hoover documents the severity and extent of the FBI's unilateral covert operation. Had people in the 1950s known what the Bureau's files contained, asserts one historian, McCarthyism would most likely have been called Hooverism. Making excellent use of FBI documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Sbardellati, a historian at the University of Waterloo (Ontario), has fashioned a brisk, multi-faceted narrative of historical and cultural significance.On one level, J. Edgar Hoover is a paean to cinema. Like their Soviet counterparts, American police agencies and politicians were quick to recognize film's power, which only intensified as the industry developed. The secret October 1943 report to Hoover (from a special agent in Los Angles) called the motion picture industry the greatest '\"influence upon the minds and culture, not only of the people of the United States, but of the entire world.'\" Thus, concludes Sbardellati, the FBI grasped the truth of Benedict Anderson's concept of \"imagined\" communities \"years before\" those scholars who would argue that national cinemas-and their surrounding discourses-are vital to the fabrication of national identities.The October 1943 report states that Moscow had ini 935 directed the Communist Party USA to infiltrate Hollywood labor unions and \"'the so-called cultural and creative fields' in order to 'determine the type of propaganda to be injected into the motion pictures.'\" The report further delineates an eight-pronged attack. However, says the author, the Bureau failed to develop a proper methodology to support the premises that Communist propaganda was successfully injected into movies being made during World War II, and that their putative Red slant posed a national threat. In the main, the FBI anticipated the \"hypodermic needle\" theory of audience reception-namely, that audiences are passive, uncritical monoliths into whom messages might be injected to lasting effect. Validity aside, extending this metaphor to encompass the idea of \"infection\" affords an apt view of Hoover's mindset. His FBI treated Communism as a highly mutable virus spread by even the slightest, tangential contact. A good review in the Daily Worker, for example, was enough to place Charlie Chaplin's Hmelight (1952) on the FBI's \"suspect\" list. (FBI analysts, it seems, studied film reviews with the same zeal as anxious producers.) The Daily Worker review, according to FBI files, had called Hmelight one of Chaplin's best movies, containing his \"real thinking about the world we live in, as well as his appeal for more fellowship among human beings. …","PeriodicalId":51888,"journal":{"name":"Film History","volume":"60 5 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies: The FBI and the Origins of Hollywood's Gold War\",\"authors\":\"T. Osborne\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.50-0770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"John Sbardellati J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies: The FBI and the Origins of Hollywood's Gold War Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2012. 256 pp. Hard CoverIf once-secret FBI files are any gauge, Hollywood's propagation of Communist doctrine was more cunning and pervasive than imagined. Vigilant FBI agents and informants detected the taint of Communism everywhere-in such disparate pictures as Warner Brothers' Pride of the Marines (1945), Walt Disney's Alice in Wonderland (1951), and Paramount's Roman Holiday (1953). But the FBI found few pictures more insidiously Marxist than Universal's Buck Privates Gome Home (1947). While the Abbott and Costello vehicle seemed a \\\"rather inoculous [sic] film,\\\" its true intent, the surveillance report stated, was to raise the specter of \\\"class consciousness.\\\" This sinister purpose, explained the report, was effected by crosscutting between a general's party and a buck private on KP duty. In such fashion did FBI surveillance merge into film theory and criticism.As John Sbardellati's J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies details, the Bureau unwittingly began nibbling at the edges of media theory in the silent era while monitoring movies for \\\"radicalism.\\\" Although that first Red Scare faded, J. Edgar's Hoover's fears never abated. Rather, they so intensified during World War II that Hoover launched a sweeping secret investigation of Hollywood that lasted from 1942 to 1958. J. Edgar Hoover documents the severity and extent of the FBI's unilateral covert operation. Had people in the 1950s known what the Bureau's files contained, asserts one historian, McCarthyism would most likely have been called Hooverism. Making excellent use of FBI documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Sbardellati, a historian at the University of Waterloo (Ontario), has fashioned a brisk, multi-faceted narrative of historical and cultural significance.On one level, J. Edgar Hoover is a paean to cinema. Like their Soviet counterparts, American police agencies and politicians were quick to recognize film's power, which only intensified as the industry developed. The secret October 1943 report to Hoover (from a special agent in Los Angles) called the motion picture industry the greatest '\\\"influence upon the minds and culture, not only of the people of the United States, but of the entire world.'\\\" Thus, concludes Sbardellati, the FBI grasped the truth of Benedict Anderson's concept of \\\"imagined\\\" communities \\\"years before\\\" those scholars who would argue that national cinemas-and their surrounding discourses-are vital to the fabrication of national identities.The October 1943 report states that Moscow had ini 935 directed the Communist Party USA to infiltrate Hollywood labor unions and \\\"'the so-called cultural and creative fields' in order to 'determine the type of propaganda to be injected into the motion pictures.'\\\" The report further delineates an eight-pronged attack. However, says the author, the Bureau failed to develop a proper methodology to support the premises that Communist propaganda was successfully injected into movies being made during World War II, and that their putative Red slant posed a national threat. In the main, the FBI anticipated the \\\"hypodermic needle\\\" theory of audience reception-namely, that audiences are passive, uncritical monoliths into whom messages might be injected to lasting effect. Validity aside, extending this metaphor to encompass the idea of \\\"infection\\\" affords an apt view of Hoover's mindset. His FBI treated Communism as a highly mutable virus spread by even the slightest, tangential contact. A good review in the Daily Worker, for example, was enough to place Charlie Chaplin's Hmelight (1952) on the FBI's \\\"suspect\\\" list. (FBI analysts, it seems, studied film reviews with the same zeal as anxious producers.) The Daily Worker review, according to FBI files, had called Hmelight one of Chaplin's best movies, containing his \\\"real thinking about the world we live in, as well as his appeal for more fellowship among human beings. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":51888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Film History\",\"volume\":\"60 5 1\",\"pages\":\"83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Film History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-0770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-0770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《埃德加·胡佛去看电影:联邦调查局和好莱坞黄金战争的起源》伊萨卡和伦敦:康奈尔大学出版社,2012年。如果以曾经的FBI机密文件为标准,那么好莱坞对共产主义教义的宣传比想象中更加狡猾和普遍。警觉的联邦调查局特工和线人发现共产主义的污点无处不在——在华纳兄弟的《海军陆战队的骄傲》(1945)、迪斯尼的《爱丽丝梦游仙境》(1951)和派拉蒙的《罗马假日》(1953)等迥异的影片中。但联邦调查局发现,没有几部电影比环球公司的《巴克私有制国美》(1947)更阴险地带有马克思主义色彩。虽然雅培和科斯特洛的汽车看起来是一部“相当无知的电影”,但监控报告指出,它的真正意图是唤起“阶级意识”的幽灵。报告解释说,这一险恶的目的是由一名将军的政党和一名执行KP任务的二等兵之间的横切造成的。就这样,联邦调查局的监视活动融入了电影理论和批评之中。正如John Sbardellati的《J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies》所详细描述的那样,该局在监视电影中的“激进主义”时,不知不觉地开始啃咬无声时代媒体理论的边缘。虽然第一次红色恐慌消退了,但埃德加的胡佛的恐惧从未减弱。相反,这种情况在第二次世界大战期间加剧,以至于胡佛从1942年到1958年对好莱坞进行了全面的秘密调查。j·埃德加·胡佛记录了联邦调查局单方面秘密行动的严重性和范围。一位历史学家断言,如果20世纪50年代的人知道fbi的文件中包含了什么,麦卡锡主义很可能会被称为胡佛主义。滑铁卢大学(安大略省)的历史学家Sbardellati通过《信息自由法》(Freedom of Information Act)出色地利用了联邦调查局(FBI)的文件,对历史和文化意义进行了生动、多方面的叙述。在某种程度上,j·埃德加·胡佛是电影的赞歌。与苏联同行一样,美国的警察机构和政界人士很快就认识到了电影的力量,随着电影行业的发展,这种力量只会越来越强。1943年10月,一份提交给胡佛的秘密报告(来自洛杉矶的一名特工)称,电影工业不仅对美国人民,而且对全世界人民的思想和文化产生了最大的“影响”。因此,Sbardellati总结道,联邦调查局在“早于”那些认为国家电影及其周边话语对国家身份建构至关重要的学者”的几年前,就掌握了本尼迪克特·安德森(Benedict Anderson)“想象”社区概念的真相。1943年10月的报告指出,莫斯科在1995年指示美国共产党渗透到好莱坞工会和“所谓的文化和创意领域”,以便“确定要注入电影的宣传类型”。报告进一步描述了一种八管齐下的攻击。然而,作者说,该局未能制定一种适当的方法来支持下述前提,即共产主义宣传成功地注入了二战期间制作的电影,以及它们假定的红色倾向构成了国家威胁。总的来说,FBI预测了受众接受的“皮下注射针”理论——也就是说,受众是被动的、不加批判的巨石,信息可能会被注入其中,产生持久的影响。抛开有效性不谈,把这个比喻延伸到“感染”这个概念上,可以很好地反映胡佛的心态。他的联邦调查局将共产主义视为一种高度易变的病毒,即使是最轻微的接触也会传播。例如,《每日工人》(Daily Worker)上的一篇好评足以将查理·卓别林(Charlie Chaplin)的《赫梅利特》(Hmelight, 1952)列入FBI的“嫌疑人”名单。(看起来,FBI的分析师研究影评的热情,和焦虑的制片人是一样的。)根据联邦调查局的文件,《每日工人》评论称《赫米莱特》是卓别林最好的电影之一,包含了他“对我们生活的世界的真实思考,以及他对人类之间更多友谊的呼吁”。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies: The FBI and the Origins of Hollywood's Gold War
John Sbardellati J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies: The FBI and the Origins of Hollywood's Gold War Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2012. 256 pp. Hard CoverIf once-secret FBI files are any gauge, Hollywood's propagation of Communist doctrine was more cunning and pervasive than imagined. Vigilant FBI agents and informants detected the taint of Communism everywhere-in such disparate pictures as Warner Brothers' Pride of the Marines (1945), Walt Disney's Alice in Wonderland (1951), and Paramount's Roman Holiday (1953). But the FBI found few pictures more insidiously Marxist than Universal's Buck Privates Gome Home (1947). While the Abbott and Costello vehicle seemed a "rather inoculous [sic] film," its true intent, the surveillance report stated, was to raise the specter of "class consciousness." This sinister purpose, explained the report, was effected by crosscutting between a general's party and a buck private on KP duty. In such fashion did FBI surveillance merge into film theory and criticism.As John Sbardellati's J. Edgar Hoover Goes to the Movies details, the Bureau unwittingly began nibbling at the edges of media theory in the silent era while monitoring movies for "radicalism." Although that first Red Scare faded, J. Edgar's Hoover's fears never abated. Rather, they so intensified during World War II that Hoover launched a sweeping secret investigation of Hollywood that lasted from 1942 to 1958. J. Edgar Hoover documents the severity and extent of the FBI's unilateral covert operation. Had people in the 1950s known what the Bureau's files contained, asserts one historian, McCarthyism would most likely have been called Hooverism. Making excellent use of FBI documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Sbardellati, a historian at the University of Waterloo (Ontario), has fashioned a brisk, multi-faceted narrative of historical and cultural significance.On one level, J. Edgar Hoover is a paean to cinema. Like their Soviet counterparts, American police agencies and politicians were quick to recognize film's power, which only intensified as the industry developed. The secret October 1943 report to Hoover (from a special agent in Los Angles) called the motion picture industry the greatest '"influence upon the minds and culture, not only of the people of the United States, but of the entire world.'" Thus, concludes Sbardellati, the FBI grasped the truth of Benedict Anderson's concept of "imagined" communities "years before" those scholars who would argue that national cinemas-and their surrounding discourses-are vital to the fabrication of national identities.The October 1943 report states that Moscow had ini 935 directed the Communist Party USA to infiltrate Hollywood labor unions and "'the so-called cultural and creative fields' in order to 'determine the type of propaganda to be injected into the motion pictures.'" The report further delineates an eight-pronged attack. However, says the author, the Bureau failed to develop a proper methodology to support the premises that Communist propaganda was successfully injected into movies being made during World War II, and that their putative Red slant posed a national threat. In the main, the FBI anticipated the "hypodermic needle" theory of audience reception-namely, that audiences are passive, uncritical monoliths into whom messages might be injected to lasting effect. Validity aside, extending this metaphor to encompass the idea of "infection" affords an apt view of Hoover's mindset. His FBI treated Communism as a highly mutable virus spread by even the slightest, tangential contact. A good review in the Daily Worker, for example, was enough to place Charlie Chaplin's Hmelight (1952) on the FBI's "suspect" list. (FBI analysts, it seems, studied film reviews with the same zeal as anxious producers.) The Daily Worker review, according to FBI files, had called Hmelight one of Chaplin's best movies, containing his "real thinking about the world we live in, as well as his appeal for more fellowship among human beings. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Film History
Film History FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The subject of Film History is the historical development of the motion picture, and the social, technological, and economic context in which this has occurred. Its areas of interest range from the technical through all aspects of production and distribution. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信