为什么不是哲学家之王?以及其他对君主政体的反对

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Phenomenology and Mind Pub Date : 2019-09-10 DOI:10.13128/PHE_MI-26075

Dragan Kuljanin

{"title":"为什么不是哲学家之王?以及其他对君主政体的反对","authors":"Dragan Kuljanin","doi":"10.13128/PHE_MI-26075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I will examine epistocracy as a form of limiting the political agency of some citizens (by removing their political rights) and offer an internal critique of it. I will argue that epistocracy runs into a number of logical and epistemic problems in trying to define who should be the members of an epistocratic polity. Furthermore, I will argue that the argument for epistocracy cannot ignore unjust background conditions. I will also suggest that some of the problems epistocracy attempts to correct can be solved in a more just way, while preserving democracy.","PeriodicalId":37133,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology and Mind","volume":"22 1","pages":"80-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Not a Philosopher King? and Other Objections to Epistocracy\",\"authors\":\"Dragan Kuljanin\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/PHE_MI-26075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I will examine epistocracy as a form of limiting the political agency of some citizens (by removing their political rights) and offer an internal critique of it. I will argue that epistocracy runs into a number of logical and epistemic problems in trying to define who should be the members of an epistocratic polity. Furthermore, I will argue that the argument for epistocracy cannot ignore unjust background conditions. I will also suggest that some of the problems epistocracy attempts to correct can be solved in a more just way, while preserving democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phenomenology and Mind\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"80-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phenomenology and Mind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/PHE_MI-26075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/PHE_MI-26075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中，我将研究作为限制某些公民的政治代理(通过剥夺他们的政治权利)的一种形式的君主政体，并对其进行内部批评。我将论证，在试图界定谁应该是贵族政治的成员时，贵族政治遇到了许多逻辑和认识论的问题。此外，我将论证，关于贵族政治的论证不能忽视不公正的背景条件。我还将提出，在保留民主的同时，贵族政治试图纠正的一些问题可以用一种更公正的方式解决。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Why Not a Philosopher King? and Other Objections to Epistocracy

In this paper I will examine epistocracy as a form of limiting the political agency of some citizens (by removing their political rights) and offer an internal critique of it. I will argue that epistocracy runs into a number of logical and epistemic problems in trying to define who should be the members of an epistocratic polity. Furthermore, I will argue that the argument for epistocracy cannot ignore unjust background conditions. I will also suggest that some of the problems epistocracy attempts to correct can be solved in a more just way, while preserving democracy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Phenomenology and Mind Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

25 weeks