行为信念预测推荐行为,特别是当对公共卫生来源的信任较低时:来自美国成年人三种COVID-19预防行为的纵向研究的证据。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Journal of Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1080/10810730.2023.2278615
Ava Kikut-Stein
{"title":"行为信念预测推荐行为,特别是当对公共卫生来源的信任较低时:来自美国成年人三种COVID-19预防行为的纵向研究的证据。","authors":"Ava Kikut-Stein","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2023.2278615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public distrust in official sources of health information and uncertainty about novel guidelines may discourage engagement in recommended disease prevention practices. The current study tests the hypothesis that building confidence in positive behavioral outcomes may support recommendation following even in the context of low trust in recommendation sources. This set of longitudinal studies examines the main and interaction effects of trust in official sources and behavioral beliefs in their prediction of recommended COVID-19 prevention behaviors (facemask wearing, social distancing, vaccination). Repeated measurement data were collected from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults in May/June 2020 (T1; <i>n</i> = 1074), July 2020 (T2; <i>n</i> = 889), and April/June 2021 (T3; <i>n</i> = 750). All five tests, using lagged linear regression, found negative interactions between trust and behavioral beliefs, as hypothesized; three were significant (T1-T2: facemask wearing <i>B</i>=-0.10, SE = 0.04; T1-T3: social distancing <i>B</i>=-0.20, SE = 0.06; T2-T3 vaccination <i>B=</i>-0.27, SE = 0.10) and two were consistent albeit not significant (T1-T3: social distancing <i>B</i>=-0.13, SE = 0.08; T1-T3: facemask wearing <i>B=</i>-0.11, SE = 0.06). Supporting hypotheses, trust in recommendation sources predicted behavior most among those who were less certain about behavioral outcomes and confidence in behavioral benefits predicted behavior most among those with low trust in recommendation sources. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral Beliefs Predict Recommended Behaviors, Especially When Trust in Public Health Sources is Low: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Three COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors Among U.S. Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Ava Kikut-Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10810730.2023.2278615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Public distrust in official sources of health information and uncertainty about novel guidelines may discourage engagement in recommended disease prevention practices. The current study tests the hypothesis that building confidence in positive behavioral outcomes may support recommendation following even in the context of low trust in recommendation sources. This set of longitudinal studies examines the main and interaction effects of trust in official sources and behavioral beliefs in their prediction of recommended COVID-19 prevention behaviors (facemask wearing, social distancing, vaccination). Repeated measurement data were collected from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults in May/June 2020 (T1; <i>n</i> = 1074), July 2020 (T2; <i>n</i> = 889), and April/June 2021 (T3; <i>n</i> = 750). All five tests, using lagged linear regression, found negative interactions between trust and behavioral beliefs, as hypothesized; three were significant (T1-T2: facemask wearing <i>B</i>=-0.10, SE = 0.04; T1-T3: social distancing <i>B</i>=-0.20, SE = 0.06; T2-T3 vaccination <i>B=</i>-0.27, SE = 0.10) and two were consistent albeit not significant (T1-T3: social distancing <i>B</i>=-0.13, SE = 0.08; T1-T3: facemask wearing <i>B=</i>-0.11, SE = 0.06). Supporting hypotheses, trust in recommendation sources predicted behavior most among those who were less certain about behavioral outcomes and confidence in behavioral benefits predicted behavior most among those with low trust in recommendation sources. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2278615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2278615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公众对官方卫生信息来源的不信任和对新指南的不确定性可能会阻碍人们参与推荐的疾病预防措施。目前的研究验证了这样一个假设,即即使在对推荐来源信任度较低的情况下,对积极行为结果建立信心也可能支持推荐遵循。这组纵向研究考察了对官方来源的信任和行为信念在预测推荐的COVID-19预防行为(戴口罩、保持社交距离、接种疫苗)方面的主要作用和相互作用。2020年5月/ 6月从具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本中收集了重复测量数据(T1;n = 1074), 2020年7月(T2;n = 889), 2021年4月/ 6月(T3;n = 750)。所有五个测试,使用滞后线性回归,发现信任和行为信念之间的负相互作用,正如假设的那样;t1 ~ t2:佩戴口罩B=-0.10, SE = 0.04;t1 ~ t3:保持社交距离B=-0.20, SE = 0.06;T2-T3疫苗接种B=-0.27, SE = 0.10),两者一致,但不显著(T1-T3:社会距离B=-0.13, SE = 0.08;t1 ~ t3:佩戴口罩B=-0.11, SE = 0.06)。支持假设,对推荐来源的信任最能预测那些对行为结果不太确定的人的行为,对行为益处的信心最能预测那些对推荐来源信任度低的人的行为。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavioral Beliefs Predict Recommended Behaviors, Especially When Trust in Public Health Sources is Low: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Three COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors Among U.S. Adults.

Public distrust in official sources of health information and uncertainty about novel guidelines may discourage engagement in recommended disease prevention practices. The current study tests the hypothesis that building confidence in positive behavioral outcomes may support recommendation following even in the context of low trust in recommendation sources. This set of longitudinal studies examines the main and interaction effects of trust in official sources and behavioral beliefs in their prediction of recommended COVID-19 prevention behaviors (facemask wearing, social distancing, vaccination). Repeated measurement data were collected from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults in May/June 2020 (T1; n = 1074), July 2020 (T2; n = 889), and April/June 2021 (T3; n = 750). All five tests, using lagged linear regression, found negative interactions between trust and behavioral beliefs, as hypothesized; three were significant (T1-T2: facemask wearing B=-0.10, SE = 0.04; T1-T3: social distancing B=-0.20, SE = 0.06; T2-T3 vaccination B=-0.27, SE = 0.10) and two were consistent albeit not significant (T1-T3: social distancing B=-0.13, SE = 0.08; T1-T3: facemask wearing B=-0.11, SE = 0.06). Supporting hypotheses, trust in recommendation sources predicted behavior most among those who were less certain about behavioral outcomes and confidence in behavioral benefits predicted behavior most among those with low trust in recommendation sources. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信