超声对糖尿病足骨髓炎的诊断价值。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1089/wound.2023.0135
Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, Raúl J Molines-Barroso, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco J Álvaro-Afonso, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
{"title":"超声对糖尿病足骨髓炎的诊断价值。","authors":"Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, Raúl J Molines-Barroso, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco J Álvaro-Afonso, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to analyze the potential diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in detecting diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). <b>Approach:</b> A 1-year prospective study was conducted on 47 consecutive patients with active DFUs and suspicion of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. The following ultrasonographic features were evaluated at baseline: (1) periosteal reaction; (2) periosteal elevation; (3) cortical disruption; (4) sequestrum; and (5) positive power Doppler. The primary outcome measure aimed to establish the effectiveness of ultrasonographic features compared with aseptic bone culture for diagnosing DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic features. Sample size could not be determined as it is the first study to assess ultrasonographic features for the diagnosis of DFO. The research adhered to the guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] 2015). <b>Results:</b> All patients (<i>n</i> = 24) diagnosed with DFO exhibited positive power Doppler, resulting in a sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) of 1 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 [1-1]). Cortical disruption was present in 23 patients (95.8%) with DFO, yielding an S of 0.93, SP of 1, and AUC of 0.96 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 [0.88-1]). <b>Innovation:</b> It validates the diagnostic value of US for DFO as it is the first and largest study of its kind to establish a clear reference standard to guide clinician decision-making. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cortical disruption and positive power Doppler in assessing DFO through US.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.\",\"authors\":\"Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, Raúl J Molines-Barroso, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco J Álvaro-Afonso, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/wound.2023.0135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to analyze the potential diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in detecting diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). <b>Approach:</b> A 1-year prospective study was conducted on 47 consecutive patients with active DFUs and suspicion of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. The following ultrasonographic features were evaluated at baseline: (1) periosteal reaction; (2) periosteal elevation; (3) cortical disruption; (4) sequestrum; and (5) positive power Doppler. The primary outcome measure aimed to establish the effectiveness of ultrasonographic features compared with aseptic bone culture for diagnosing DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic features. Sample size could not be determined as it is the first study to assess ultrasonographic features for the diagnosis of DFO. The research adhered to the guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] 2015). <b>Results:</b> All patients (<i>n</i> = 24) diagnosed with DFO exhibited positive power Doppler, resulting in a sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) of 1 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 [1-1]). Cortical disruption was present in 23 patients (95.8%) with DFO, yielding an S of 0.93, SP of 1, and AUC of 0.96 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 [0.88-1]). <b>Innovation:</b> It validates the diagnostic value of US for DFO as it is the first and largest study of its kind to establish a clear reference standard to guide clinician decision-making. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cortical disruption and positive power Doppler in assessing DFO through US.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"167-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析超声检查对糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)患者糖尿病足骨髓炎(DFO)的潜在诊断能力。方法:一项为期1年的前瞻性研究对一家糖尿病足专科医院47例连续出现活动性dfu和疑似DFO的患者进行了研究。基线时评估以下超声(US)特征:1)骨膜反应;2)骨膜抬高;3)皮层断裂;4)死骨片;5)正功率多普勒。主要结果测量旨在建立超声特征与无菌骨培养诊断DFO的有效性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价超声特征的诊断价值。样本量无法进行,因为它是第一个评估诊断DFO的US特征的研究。该研究遵循诊断准确性研究指南(standard 2015)。结果:所有诊断为DFO的患者(n=24)均表现为功率多普勒阳性,敏感性(S)和特异性(SP)均为1,曲线下面积(AUC)均为1 (P)。创新:验证了US对DFO的诊断价值,是同类研究中首次也是规模最大的,建立了明确的参考标准来指导临床医生决策。结论:本研究证实了皮质破坏和正功率多普勒对超声诊断DFO的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the potential diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in detecting diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Approach: A 1-year prospective study was conducted on 47 consecutive patients with active DFUs and suspicion of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. The following ultrasonographic features were evaluated at baseline: (1) periosteal reaction; (2) periosteal elevation; (3) cortical disruption; (4) sequestrum; and (5) positive power Doppler. The primary outcome measure aimed to establish the effectiveness of ultrasonographic features compared with aseptic bone culture for diagnosing DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic features. Sample size could not be determined as it is the first study to assess ultrasonographic features for the diagnosis of DFO. The research adhered to the guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] 2015). Results: All patients (n = 24) diagnosed with DFO exhibited positive power Doppler, resulting in a sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) of 1 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (p < 0.001 [1-1]). Cortical disruption was present in 23 patients (95.8%) with DFO, yielding an S of 0.93, SP of 1, and AUC of 0.96 (p < 0.001 [0.88-1]). Innovation: It validates the diagnostic value of US for DFO as it is the first and largest study of its kind to establish a clear reference standard to guide clinician decision-making. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cortical disruption and positive power Doppler in assessing DFO through US.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信