量化数学教育中的坚实发现:代数符号意义的丧失

Q3 Social Sciences
G. Bolondi, F. Ferretti
{"title":"量化数学教育中的坚实发现:代数符号意义的丧失","authors":"G. Bolondi, F. Ferretti","doi":"10.30722/IJISME.29.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report an example of a research approach aimed at gathering quantitative pieces of evidence of solid findings in mathematics education. The main goal of this project is to provide an additional perspective on solid findings in education, to be used by teachers and by researchers in their work. As a case study, we present a situation of “loss of meaning” in algebra, exploring it with data coming from a large-scale assessment interpreted by means of theoretical lenses. We are able to give information about the extent of the phenomenon and to highlight how the phenomenon is relevant also for high-level students. This approach can provide a link between large-scale assessment results, educational research, and teachers’ practices, and suggests further research issues. Introduction and Overview Overview of the problem Mathematics education has its solid findings. As defined by European Mathematical Society (EMS, 2011), solid findings are findings that: • result from trustworthy, disciplined inquiry, thus being sound and convincing in shedding light on the question(s) they set out to answer. • are generally recognised as important contributions that have significantly influenced and/or may significantly influence the research field. • can be applied to circumstances and/or domains beyond those involved in this particular","PeriodicalId":39044,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Solid Findings in Mathematics Education: Loss of Meaning for Algebraic Symbols\",\"authors\":\"G. Bolondi, F. Ferretti\",\"doi\":\"10.30722/IJISME.29.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We report an example of a research approach aimed at gathering quantitative pieces of evidence of solid findings in mathematics education. The main goal of this project is to provide an additional perspective on solid findings in education, to be used by teachers and by researchers in their work. As a case study, we present a situation of “loss of meaning” in algebra, exploring it with data coming from a large-scale assessment interpreted by means of theoretical lenses. We are able to give information about the extent of the phenomenon and to highlight how the phenomenon is relevant also for high-level students. This approach can provide a link between large-scale assessment results, educational research, and teachers’ practices, and suggests further research issues. Introduction and Overview Overview of the problem Mathematics education has its solid findings. As defined by European Mathematical Society (EMS, 2011), solid findings are findings that: • result from trustworthy, disciplined inquiry, thus being sound and convincing in shedding light on the question(s) they set out to answer. • are generally recognised as important contributions that have significantly influenced and/or may significantly influence the research field. • can be applied to circumstances and/or domains beyond those involved in this particular\",\"PeriodicalId\":39044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.29.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.29.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们报告了一个研究方法的例子,旨在收集数学教育中坚实发现的定量证据。该项目的主要目标是为教师和研究人员在工作中使用的可靠教育发现提供额外的视角。作为一个案例研究,我们提出了代数“意义丧失”的情况,并通过理论透镜解释的大规模评估数据来探索它。我们能够提供有关这种现象的程度的信息,并强调这种现象与高水平学生的关系。这种方法可以在大规模评估结果、教育研究和教师实践之间建立联系,并提出进一步的研究问题。概观问题数学教育有其坚实的发现。根据欧洲数学学会(EMS, 2011)的定义,可靠的研究结果是:•来自值得信赖的、有纪律的调查,因此在阐明他们着手回答的问题时是合理的和令人信服的。•通常被认为是重大影响和/或可能重大影响研究领域的重要贡献。•可以应用于本特定领域之外的情况和/或领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Solid Findings in Mathematics Education: Loss of Meaning for Algebraic Symbols
We report an example of a research approach aimed at gathering quantitative pieces of evidence of solid findings in mathematics education. The main goal of this project is to provide an additional perspective on solid findings in education, to be used by teachers and by researchers in their work. As a case study, we present a situation of “loss of meaning” in algebra, exploring it with data coming from a large-scale assessment interpreted by means of theoretical lenses. We are able to give information about the extent of the phenomenon and to highlight how the phenomenon is relevant also for high-level students. This approach can provide a link between large-scale assessment results, educational research, and teachers’ practices, and suggests further research issues. Introduction and Overview Overview of the problem Mathematics education has its solid findings. As defined by European Mathematical Society (EMS, 2011), solid findings are findings that: • result from trustworthy, disciplined inquiry, thus being sound and convincing in shedding light on the question(s) they set out to answer. • are generally recognised as important contributions that have significantly influenced and/or may significantly influence the research field. • can be applied to circumstances and/or domains beyond those involved in this particular
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信