{"title":"企业社会责任在尼日利亚住房项目管理中的应用:方法论视角","authors":"Achoru Afam Mike, Achuenu Emmanuel, D. Mallo","doi":"10.20431/2454-9444.0602002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nigeria’s housing projects have continued to under-perform despite countless input on the path of both the public and private sectors which makes the housing situation a far cry from expectations. Leffat (2012) posited that under-performance in project activities exist within various phases of a housing project life cycle which make up the duration of a housing project. The life cycle phases of a housing project include: initiation, planning; design; execution and commissioning phase (Leffat, 2012). Ibem and Aduwo (2015); Joboye (2009) opined that challenges have continually marred the Nigeria housing project setting which has affected project delivery adversely to include the economy as a whole. Housing projects can deliver the expected levels of success if the challenges which abound in the different phases of a project life cycle are mitigated (Leffat, 2012). Ketut and Dwijendra (2013) noted that housing project challenges vary in nature which makes it quite daunting to address. The inability to promptly address challenges in a housing project can have a resulting and adverse effect on another aspect of the project hence the need to act early enough. The varying nature of African housing project challenges signifies the need for the best possible manpower, techniques and approaches to be used to guarantee project success (Muriithi & Crawford, 2003). Project success in the opinion of Prabjheet (2011) entails that the responsibilities in every phase of a housing project life cycle is executed to ensure the satisfaction of clients and project stakeholders. This can only be achieved by ensuring that every existing challenge is addressed promptly and properly. Abstract: Mindful of the importance of a smooth housing project process especially towards economic sustainability, challenges have continued to undermine project performance. Housing project challenges which exist in each phase of a project life cycle border on the inability of project stakeholders to deliver the required and stipulated project expectations. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) which ensures that firms’ act responsibly in service delivery has been applied in a multitude of ways by several researchers in the construction industry as well as housing projects, especially in developed nations. The need for the application of CSR in the management of housing projects by construction firms is vital as it presents potentials as a panacea to housing project challenges. However, CSR application in the management of housing projects as a panacea to housing project life cycle challenges remains unstudied which creates a gap that informed this study. Furthermore, relevant questions on its adoption and implementation in Nigerian housing projects can be best answered when an appropriate research methodology is used. The research methodology adopted for a doctoral research aimed at applying CSR in housing project management along project life cycle phases as a panacea to housing project challenges, is presented in this paper. This study adopted the research onion research design. This paper also outlines the research philosophy; approach; strategy; methods and choices. The reasons for the choices are justified as guided by the research onion. Also the research questions as well as relevant methodology literature were considered in the design. A major contribution of this paper is towards enumerating justifications for the adoption of research methods to address research questions.","PeriodicalId":93649,"journal":{"name":"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Management of Housing Projects in Nigeria: Methodological Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Achoru Afam Mike, Achuenu Emmanuel, D. Mallo\",\"doi\":\"10.20431/2454-9444.0602002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nigeria’s housing projects have continued to under-perform despite countless input on the path of both the public and private sectors which makes the housing situation a far cry from expectations. Leffat (2012) posited that under-performance in project activities exist within various phases of a housing project life cycle which make up the duration of a housing project. The life cycle phases of a housing project include: initiation, planning; design; execution and commissioning phase (Leffat, 2012). Ibem and Aduwo (2015); Joboye (2009) opined that challenges have continually marred the Nigeria housing project setting which has affected project delivery adversely to include the economy as a whole. Housing projects can deliver the expected levels of success if the challenges which abound in the different phases of a project life cycle are mitigated (Leffat, 2012). Ketut and Dwijendra (2013) noted that housing project challenges vary in nature which makes it quite daunting to address. The inability to promptly address challenges in a housing project can have a resulting and adverse effect on another aspect of the project hence the need to act early enough. The varying nature of African housing project challenges signifies the need for the best possible manpower, techniques and approaches to be used to guarantee project success (Muriithi & Crawford, 2003). Project success in the opinion of Prabjheet (2011) entails that the responsibilities in every phase of a housing project life cycle is executed to ensure the satisfaction of clients and project stakeholders. This can only be achieved by ensuring that every existing challenge is addressed promptly and properly. Abstract: Mindful of the importance of a smooth housing project process especially towards economic sustainability, challenges have continued to undermine project performance. Housing project challenges which exist in each phase of a project life cycle border on the inability of project stakeholders to deliver the required and stipulated project expectations. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) which ensures that firms’ act responsibly in service delivery has been applied in a multitude of ways by several researchers in the construction industry as well as housing projects, especially in developed nations. The need for the application of CSR in the management of housing projects by construction firms is vital as it presents potentials as a panacea to housing project challenges. However, CSR application in the management of housing projects as a panacea to housing project life cycle challenges remains unstudied which creates a gap that informed this study. Furthermore, relevant questions on its adoption and implementation in Nigerian housing projects can be best answered when an appropriate research methodology is used. The research methodology adopted for a doctoral research aimed at applying CSR in housing project management along project life cycle phases as a panacea to housing project challenges, is presented in this paper. This study adopted the research onion research design. This paper also outlines the research philosophy; approach; strategy; methods and choices. The reasons for the choices are justified as guided by the research onion. Also the research questions as well as relevant methodology literature were considered in the design. A major contribution of this paper is towards enumerating justifications for the adoption of research methods to address research questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9444.0602002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9444.0602002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管在公共和私营部门的道路上投入了无数的投入,尼日利亚的住房项目仍然表现不佳,这使得住房情况与预期相差甚远。Leffat(2012)认为,项目活动表现不佳存在于住房项目生命周期的各个阶段,这些阶段构成了住房项目的持续时间。住房项目的生命周期阶段包括:启动、规划;设计;执行和调试阶段(Leffat, 2012)。Ibem and Aduwo (2015);Joboye(2009)认为,挑战不断破坏尼日利亚的住房项目设置,这对项目交付产生了不利影响,包括整个经济。如果在项目生命周期的不同阶段存在的挑战得到缓解,住房项目可以实现预期的成功水平(Leffat, 2012)。Ketut和Dwijendra(2013)指出,住房项目挑战的性质各不相同,这使得解决起来相当艰巨。不能及时解决住房项目中的挑战可能会对项目的另一方面产生不利影响,因此需要尽早采取行动。非洲住房项目挑战的不同性质意味着需要尽可能最好的人力、技术和方法来保证项目的成功(Muriithi & Crawford, 2003)。Prabjheet(2011)认为,项目成功需要在住房项目生命周期的每个阶段执行责任,以确保客户和项目利益相关者的满意度。只有确保及时和适当地处理每一项现有挑战,才能实现这一目标。摘要:考虑到平稳的住房项目进程的重要性,特别是对经济可持续性的重要性,挑战继续破坏项目绩效。住房项目的挑战存在于项目生命周期的每个阶段,其边界是项目利益相关者无法交付所需和规定的项目期望。企业社会责任(CSR)确保了企业在提供服务时的负责任行为,这一概念已被一些研究人员以多种方式应用于建筑业和住房项目,尤其是在发达国家。建筑公司在住房项目管理中应用企业社会责任的必要性是至关重要的,因为它有可能成为解决住房项目挑战的灵丹妙药。然而,企业社会责任在住房项目管理中的应用作为解决住房项目生命周期挑战的灵丹妙药仍未得到研究,这造成了本研究的空白。此外,只有采用适当的研究方法,才能最好地回答关于在尼日利亚住房项目中采用和执行该准则的有关问题。本文介绍了一项博士研究所采用的研究方法,该研究旨在将企业社会责任应用于住房项目管理中,并将其作为应对住房项目挑战的灵丹妙药。本研究采用研究洋葱的研究设计。本文还概述了本文的研究理念;方法;策略;方法和选择。这些选择的理由在研究洋葱的指导下是合理的。设计中还考虑了研究问题和相关的方法论文献。本文的一个主要贡献是列举了采用研究方法来解决研究问题的理由。
Application of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Management of Housing Projects in Nigeria: Methodological Perspective
Nigeria’s housing projects have continued to under-perform despite countless input on the path of both the public and private sectors which makes the housing situation a far cry from expectations. Leffat (2012) posited that under-performance in project activities exist within various phases of a housing project life cycle which make up the duration of a housing project. The life cycle phases of a housing project include: initiation, planning; design; execution and commissioning phase (Leffat, 2012). Ibem and Aduwo (2015); Joboye (2009) opined that challenges have continually marred the Nigeria housing project setting which has affected project delivery adversely to include the economy as a whole. Housing projects can deliver the expected levels of success if the challenges which abound in the different phases of a project life cycle are mitigated (Leffat, 2012). Ketut and Dwijendra (2013) noted that housing project challenges vary in nature which makes it quite daunting to address. The inability to promptly address challenges in a housing project can have a resulting and adverse effect on another aspect of the project hence the need to act early enough. The varying nature of African housing project challenges signifies the need for the best possible manpower, techniques and approaches to be used to guarantee project success (Muriithi & Crawford, 2003). Project success in the opinion of Prabjheet (2011) entails that the responsibilities in every phase of a housing project life cycle is executed to ensure the satisfaction of clients and project stakeholders. This can only be achieved by ensuring that every existing challenge is addressed promptly and properly. Abstract: Mindful of the importance of a smooth housing project process especially towards economic sustainability, challenges have continued to undermine project performance. Housing project challenges which exist in each phase of a project life cycle border on the inability of project stakeholders to deliver the required and stipulated project expectations. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) which ensures that firms’ act responsibly in service delivery has been applied in a multitude of ways by several researchers in the construction industry as well as housing projects, especially in developed nations. The need for the application of CSR in the management of housing projects by construction firms is vital as it presents potentials as a panacea to housing project challenges. However, CSR application in the management of housing projects as a panacea to housing project life cycle challenges remains unstudied which creates a gap that informed this study. Furthermore, relevant questions on its adoption and implementation in Nigerian housing projects can be best answered when an appropriate research methodology is used. The research methodology adopted for a doctoral research aimed at applying CSR in housing project management along project life cycle phases as a panacea to housing project challenges, is presented in this paper. This study adopted the research onion research design. This paper also outlines the research philosophy; approach; strategy; methods and choices. The reasons for the choices are justified as guided by the research onion. Also the research questions as well as relevant methodology literature were considered in the design. A major contribution of this paper is towards enumerating justifications for the adoption of research methods to address research questions.