在儿童部分住院治疗项目中将个性化测量纳入基于测量的护理的试点项目

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ruben G. Martinez, Galen D. McNeil, Danielle Cornacchio, Benjamin N. Schneider, Tara S. Peris
{"title":"在儿童部分住院治疗项目中将个性化测量纳入基于测量的护理的试点项目","authors":"Ruben G. Martinez,&nbsp;Galen D. McNeil,&nbsp;Danielle Cornacchio,&nbsp;Benjamin N. Schneider,&nbsp;Tara S. Peris","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Measurement-based care (MBC), or the regular use of progress measures to inform clinical decision-making, improves quality of care and clinical outcomes. MBC typically focuses on standardized rather than individualized outcome measurement. In this pilot study, we examined the clinical utility of integrating individualized measurement with existing standardized outcome monitoring in a children’s </span>partial hospitalization program. Participants were 48 youth (</span><em>M</em> age 10.13 ± 1.39; 54.2% male, 41.7% female, 4.2% transgender or nonbinary). Comorbidity was common; 83.4% of youth had more than one diagnosis at intake. Using the Youth Top Problems for individualized outcome measurement, we examined Top Problem content and clinical improvement over time. Finally, we examined completion rates and describe implementation issues. Top Problems were heterogeneous and sensitive to change. Of the 144 problems, 107 (74%) had a focus consistent with measures used in program, while 37 (26%) were not captured by standardized measures used in program. Effect sizes from admission to final measurement ranged from Cohen’s <em>d</em> = .75 – 1.00. Initial adoption of the MBC was strong, but sustained use of the system over the treatment course was challenging. Individualized outcome measurement in children’s partial hospitalization programs is feasible to administer and sensitive to clinical change that is unique from change captured in standardized measures. Parents were able to self-identify clinically meaningful, highly individualized Top Problems. Challenges of implementation and clinical assessment in acute settings and potential strategies for improving implementation are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Pages 191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Project to Integrate Individualized Measurement Into Measurement-Based Care in a Child Partial Hospitalization Program\",\"authors\":\"Ruben G. Martinez,&nbsp;Galen D. McNeil,&nbsp;Danielle Cornacchio,&nbsp;Benjamin N. Schneider,&nbsp;Tara S. Peris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beth.2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Measurement-based care (MBC), or the regular use of progress measures to inform clinical decision-making, improves quality of care and clinical outcomes. MBC typically focuses on standardized rather than individualized outcome measurement. In this pilot study, we examined the clinical utility of integrating individualized measurement with existing standardized outcome monitoring in a children’s </span>partial hospitalization program. Participants were 48 youth (</span><em>M</em> age 10.13 ± 1.39; 54.2% male, 41.7% female, 4.2% transgender or nonbinary). Comorbidity was common; 83.4% of youth had more than one diagnosis at intake. Using the Youth Top Problems for individualized outcome measurement, we examined Top Problem content and clinical improvement over time. Finally, we examined completion rates and describe implementation issues. Top Problems were heterogeneous and sensitive to change. Of the 144 problems, 107 (74%) had a focus consistent with measures used in program, while 37 (26%) were not captured by standardized measures used in program. Effect sizes from admission to final measurement ranged from Cohen’s <em>d</em> = .75 – 1.00. Initial adoption of the MBC was strong, but sustained use of the system over the treatment course was challenging. Individualized outcome measurement in children’s partial hospitalization programs is feasible to administer and sensitive to clinical change that is unique from change captured in standardized measures. Parents were able to self-identify clinically meaningful, highly individualized Top Problems. Challenges of implementation and clinical assessment in acute settings and potential strategies for improving implementation are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 191-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789423000679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789423000679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以测量为基础的护理(MBC),即定期使用进展测量结果为临床决策提供依据,可提高护理质量和临床效果。MBC 通常侧重于标准化而非个体化的结果测量。在这项试点研究中,我们考察了在儿童部分住院治疗项目中将个体化测量与现有标准化结果监测相结合的临床实用性。参与者为 48 名青少年(平均年龄为 10.13±1.39 岁;54.2% 为男性,41.7% 为女性,4.2% 为变性或非二元性别)。合并症很常见;83.4%的青少年在入组时有一种以上的诊断。通过使用 "青少年首要问题 "进行个性化结果测量,我们研究了 "首要问题 "的内容和随时间推移的临床改善情况。最后,我们对完成率进行了检查,并对实施问题进行了描述。"首要问题 "具有异质性,对变化非常敏感。在 144 个问题中,107 个问题(74%)的重点与计划中使用的测量方法一致,而 37 个问题(26%)没有被计划中使用的标准化测量方法所捕捉。从入院到最终测量的效果大小在 Cohen's d = .75 - 1.00 之间。最初采用 MBC 的效果很好,但在治疗过程中持续使用该系统则具有挑战性。儿童部分住院治疗项目中的个体化结果测量方法是可行的,并且能够敏感地反映临床变化,这种变化与标准化测量方法所捕捉到的变化截然不同。家长们能够自我识别具有临床意义的、高度个性化的 "首要问题"。讨论了在急性期环境中实施和临床评估所面临的挑战,以及改进实施的潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Project to Integrate Individualized Measurement Into Measurement-Based Care in a Child Partial Hospitalization Program

Measurement-based care (MBC), or the regular use of progress measures to inform clinical decision-making, improves quality of care and clinical outcomes. MBC typically focuses on standardized rather than individualized outcome measurement. In this pilot study, we examined the clinical utility of integrating individualized measurement with existing standardized outcome monitoring in a children’s partial hospitalization program. Participants were 48 youth (M age 10.13 ± 1.39; 54.2% male, 41.7% female, 4.2% transgender or nonbinary). Comorbidity was common; 83.4% of youth had more than one diagnosis at intake. Using the Youth Top Problems for individualized outcome measurement, we examined Top Problem content and clinical improvement over time. Finally, we examined completion rates and describe implementation issues. Top Problems were heterogeneous and sensitive to change. Of the 144 problems, 107 (74%) had a focus consistent with measures used in program, while 37 (26%) were not captured by standardized measures used in program. Effect sizes from admission to final measurement ranged from Cohen’s d = .75 – 1.00. Initial adoption of the MBC was strong, but sustained use of the system over the treatment course was challenging. Individualized outcome measurement in children’s partial hospitalization programs is feasible to administer and sensitive to clinical change that is unique from change captured in standardized measures. Parents were able to self-identify clinically meaningful, highly individualized Top Problems. Challenges of implementation and clinical assessment in acute settings and potential strategies for improving implementation are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信