使用虚拟现实设备进行痴呆患者家庭教育的特点和偏好:一项描述性研究

Q4 Nursing
H. Cheon, S. Jung, Jiyeon Kim, Yoosun Yang, G. Kim, Jun-Ah Song
{"title":"使用虚拟现实设备进行痴呆患者家庭教育的特点和偏好:一项描述性研究","authors":"H. Cheon, S. Jung, Jiyeon Kim, Yoosun Yang, G. Kim, Jun-Ah Song","doi":"10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.2.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to identify characteristics and preferences related to the use of virtual reality(VR) devices for the education of families of persons with dementia.Methods: Using a descriptive study design, an online survey was conducted for families of persons with dementia (N=136, mean age=48.14±10.4 years). Descriptive statistics, Pearson's x2 test, and Fisher's exact test were calculated using SPSS 25.0.Results: Most families of persons with dementia used electronic devices proficiently at least to some extent (n=117, 86%). It was found that they were willing to use the VR-based education program with a certain degree of inconvenience (n=133, 97.8%). When participating in VR-based education programs, the most preferred device was open VR (n=77, 56.6%) followed by closed VR (n=42, 30.9%). The preferred training time for all four devices was around 20 minutes. There was a statistically significant difference between proficiency in electronic device use and gender (x2=9.11, p=.045), age (x2=19.83, p=.004), and educational background (x2=18.46, p=.007), whereas only gender (x2=12.17, p=.006) was a significant factor for a willingness to be inconvenienced to get educated using VR devices. In the case of the preferred interaction method, only gender (x2=10.08, p=.033) had a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: Families of persons with dementia had a positive intention to use VR-based education programs, regardless of age and educational background, even with the inconvenience. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for the production of VR-based education programs in the future.","PeriodicalId":52377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and Preferences Related to Using Virtual Reality Devices for Education of Families of Persons with Dementia: A Descriptive Study\",\"authors\":\"H. Cheon, S. Jung, Jiyeon Kim, Yoosun Yang, G. Kim, Jun-Ah Song\",\"doi\":\"10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.2.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aimed to identify characteristics and preferences related to the use of virtual reality(VR) devices for the education of families of persons with dementia.Methods: Using a descriptive study design, an online survey was conducted for families of persons with dementia (N=136, mean age=48.14±10.4 years). Descriptive statistics, Pearson's x2 test, and Fisher's exact test were calculated using SPSS 25.0.Results: Most families of persons with dementia used electronic devices proficiently at least to some extent (n=117, 86%). It was found that they were willing to use the VR-based education program with a certain degree of inconvenience (n=133, 97.8%). When participating in VR-based education programs, the most preferred device was open VR (n=77, 56.6%) followed by closed VR (n=42, 30.9%). The preferred training time for all four devices was around 20 minutes. There was a statistically significant difference between proficiency in electronic device use and gender (x2=9.11, p=.045), age (x2=19.83, p=.004), and educational background (x2=18.46, p=.007), whereas only gender (x2=12.17, p=.006) was a significant factor for a willingness to be inconvenienced to get educated using VR devices. In the case of the preferred interaction method, only gender (x2=10.08, p=.033) had a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: Families of persons with dementia had a positive intention to use VR-based education programs, regardless of age and educational background, even with the inconvenience. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for the production of VR-based education programs in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.2.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.2.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定与使用虚拟现实(VR)设备进行痴呆患者家庭教育相关的特征和偏好。方法:采用描述性研究设计,对痴呆患者家庭进行在线调查(N=136,平均年龄=48.14±10.4岁)。使用SPSS 25.0进行描述性统计、Pearson's x2检验和Fisher's精确检验。结果:大多数痴呆患者家庭至少在一定程度上熟练使用电子设备(n=117, 86%)。发现他们愿意使用基于vr的教育方案,但有一定程度的不便(n=133, 97.8%)。在参与基于VR的教育项目时,最受欢迎的设备是开放式VR (n=77, 56.6%),其次是封闭式VR (n=42, 30.9%)。所有四种设备的首选训练时间都在20分钟左右。电子设备使用熟练程度与性别(x2=9.11, p= 0.045)、年龄(x2=19.83, p= 0.004)、学历(x2=18.46, p= 0.007)有统计学差异,而只有性别(x2=12.17, p= 0.006)是不方便使用VR设备接受教育的意愿的显著因素。在首选交互方式的情况下,只有性别(x2=10.08, p= 0.033)有统计学意义。结论:痴呆患者的家庭无论年龄和教育背景如何,都有积极的意愿使用基于vr的教育项目,即使不方便。本研究的结果有望作为未来vr教育项目制作的基础数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics and Preferences Related to Using Virtual Reality Devices for Education of Families of Persons with Dementia: A Descriptive Study
Purpose: This study aimed to identify characteristics and preferences related to the use of virtual reality(VR) devices for the education of families of persons with dementia.Methods: Using a descriptive study design, an online survey was conducted for families of persons with dementia (N=136, mean age=48.14±10.4 years). Descriptive statistics, Pearson's x2 test, and Fisher's exact test were calculated using SPSS 25.0.Results: Most families of persons with dementia used electronic devices proficiently at least to some extent (n=117, 86%). It was found that they were willing to use the VR-based education program with a certain degree of inconvenience (n=133, 97.8%). When participating in VR-based education programs, the most preferred device was open VR (n=77, 56.6%) followed by closed VR (n=42, 30.9%). The preferred training time for all four devices was around 20 minutes. There was a statistically significant difference between proficiency in electronic device use and gender (x2=9.11, p=.045), age (x2=19.83, p=.004), and educational background (x2=18.46, p=.007), whereas only gender (x2=12.17, p=.006) was a significant factor for a willingness to be inconvenienced to get educated using VR devices. In the case of the preferred interaction method, only gender (x2=10.08, p=.033) had a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: Families of persons with dementia had a positive intention to use VR-based education programs, regardless of age and educational background, even with the inconvenience. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for the production of VR-based education programs in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信