解码网络模式:数字时代的网络殖民主义和后殖民知识分子

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
Pinar Tuzçu
{"title":"解码网络模式:数字时代的网络殖民主义和后殖民知识分子","authors":"Pinar Tuzçu","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2021.1985264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I look at how the modes of knowledge production in the digital age construct new colonial relations. I argue that these cybercolonial hierarchies are defined by a new elite: an artificial intelligentsia. In this regard, I discuss how the epistemic shifts in cybercolonialism redefine the role of postcolonial intellectuals in the digital age. In order to trace these shifts, I analyse the 2018 data scandal concerning Cambridge Analytica, a now defunct British political consulting firm allegedly involved in electioneering in 68 countries, to show that the power held by this artificial intelligentsia is encoded within a largely inaccessible field of computing, producing information that looks rhetorically neutral but is artificial in nature. My analysis demonstrates that this kind of knowledge production deepens the geopolitical hierarchies between the Global North and South as it bears new mechanisms of silencing. For the silenced subjects in cybercolonialism I coin the term cybaltern. The cybaltern refers to a group of people whose voices are muted and rendered unheard, paradoxically despite and because of the digital tools available to them. With this in mind, postcolonial intellectuals are given the task of decoding the discursive gaps and traps that (re)produce a condition of cybalternity.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"514 - 527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the cybaltern: cybercolonialism and postcolonial intellectuals in the digital age\",\"authors\":\"Pinar Tuzçu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13688790.2021.1985264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, I look at how the modes of knowledge production in the digital age construct new colonial relations. I argue that these cybercolonial hierarchies are defined by a new elite: an artificial intelligentsia. In this regard, I discuss how the epistemic shifts in cybercolonialism redefine the role of postcolonial intellectuals in the digital age. In order to trace these shifts, I analyse the 2018 data scandal concerning Cambridge Analytica, a now defunct British political consulting firm allegedly involved in electioneering in 68 countries, to show that the power held by this artificial intelligentsia is encoded within a largely inaccessible field of computing, producing information that looks rhetorically neutral but is artificial in nature. My analysis demonstrates that this kind of knowledge production deepens the geopolitical hierarchies between the Global North and South as it bears new mechanisms of silencing. For the silenced subjects in cybercolonialism I coin the term cybaltern. The cybaltern refers to a group of people whose voices are muted and rendered unheard, paradoxically despite and because of the digital tools available to them. With this in mind, postcolonial intellectuals are given the task of decoding the discursive gaps and traps that (re)produce a condition of cybalternity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postcolonial Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"514 - 527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postcolonial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2021.1985264\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2021.1985264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在这篇文章中,我研究了数字时代的知识生产模式如何构建新的殖民关系。我认为,这些网络殖民等级制度是由一个新的精英阶层定义的:一个人工智能阶层。在这方面,我讨论了网络殖民主义的认知转变如何重新定义后殖民知识分子在数字时代的角色。为了追踪这些变化,我分析了2018年有关剑桥分析公司(Cambridge Analytica)的数据丑闻,该公司是一家现已倒闭的英国政治咨询公司,据称参与了68个国家的竞选活动,以表明这种人工智能掌握的权力被编码在一个基本上无法进入的计算领域,产生的信息表面上看起来中立,但本质上是人为的。我的分析表明,这种知识生产加深了全球北方和南方之间的地缘政治等级,因为它具有新的沉默机制。对于那些在网络殖民主义中沉默的主体,我创造了“网络欺凌”这个词。cybaltern指的是一群人,他们的声音被压制,听不见,矛盾的是,尽管他们可以使用数字工具,但也正是因为如此。考虑到这一点,后殖民知识分子被赋予了解码话语缺口和陷阱的任务,这些缺口和陷阱(重新)产生了网络世界的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decoding the cybaltern: cybercolonialism and postcolonial intellectuals in the digital age
ABSTRACT In this article, I look at how the modes of knowledge production in the digital age construct new colonial relations. I argue that these cybercolonial hierarchies are defined by a new elite: an artificial intelligentsia. In this regard, I discuss how the epistemic shifts in cybercolonialism redefine the role of postcolonial intellectuals in the digital age. In order to trace these shifts, I analyse the 2018 data scandal concerning Cambridge Analytica, a now defunct British political consulting firm allegedly involved in electioneering in 68 countries, to show that the power held by this artificial intelligentsia is encoded within a largely inaccessible field of computing, producing information that looks rhetorically neutral but is artificial in nature. My analysis demonstrates that this kind of knowledge production deepens the geopolitical hierarchies between the Global North and South as it bears new mechanisms of silencing. For the silenced subjects in cybercolonialism I coin the term cybaltern. The cybaltern refers to a group of people whose voices are muted and rendered unheard, paradoxically despite and because of the digital tools available to them. With this in mind, postcolonial intellectuals are given the task of decoding the discursive gaps and traps that (re)produce a condition of cybalternity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信