妊娠早期糖尿病的预测:可能吗?

Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.2399/prn.22.0302004
İnci Hansu, Kemal Hansu, Zekeriya Balık, Halis Özdemir, N. Yücel
{"title":"妊娠早期糖尿病的预测:可能吗?","authors":"İnci Hansu, Kemal Hansu, Zekeriya Balık, Halis Özdemir, N. Yücel","doi":"10.2399/prn.22.0302004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the first trimester markers that may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to evaluate whether those markers might be used for prediction of gestational diabetes or not. Methods: Pregnant women between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation applying to the university hospital between August 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Body mass index calculation and blood tests including complete blood count, TSH, T3, T4, HbA1c, uric acid, CRP, procalcitonin, PAPP-A and b-hCG levels were done during assessment followed by 50 grams of glucose challenge test between the 24 and 28 weeks of gestation for each woman. Patients with positive results were further evaluated with a 3-hour, 100-g OGTT. According to the diagnostic test results, the relationship between biochemical markers during the first trimester, BMI and GDM was statistically analyzed. Results: A hundred and eighty-two pregnant women participated in the study. Fifty-four women had positive glucose challenge test (GCT) results while 128 women had negative results. Pregnant women with positive GCT results underwent 3-hour, 100-g OGTT and, 24 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM, while 158 pregnant women were considered healthy according to the results. There was no statistically significant difference between GDM and non-GDM groups in terms of age, height, TSH, T3, T4, b-hCG-mom, PAPP-A, PAPP-A-mom, uric acid and procalcitonin (p>0.05). The mean body weight, body mass index and HbA1c levels were higher and b-hCG levels were lower in the GDM group compared to the non-GDM group, and these findings were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of first trimester markers in GDM prediction seems to have no significance. There is a need for extensive, randomized studies with universal criteria.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester: is it possible?\",\"authors\":\"İnci Hansu, Kemal Hansu, Zekeriya Balık, Halis Özdemir, N. Yücel\",\"doi\":\"10.2399/prn.22.0302004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the first trimester markers that may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to evaluate whether those markers might be used for prediction of gestational diabetes or not. Methods: Pregnant women between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation applying to the university hospital between August 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Body mass index calculation and blood tests including complete blood count, TSH, T3, T4, HbA1c, uric acid, CRP, procalcitonin, PAPP-A and b-hCG levels were done during assessment followed by 50 grams of glucose challenge test between the 24 and 28 weeks of gestation for each woman. Patients with positive results were further evaluated with a 3-hour, 100-g OGTT. According to the diagnostic test results, the relationship between biochemical markers during the first trimester, BMI and GDM was statistically analyzed. Results: A hundred and eighty-two pregnant women participated in the study. Fifty-four women had positive glucose challenge test (GCT) results while 128 women had negative results. Pregnant women with positive GCT results underwent 3-hour, 100-g OGTT and, 24 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM, while 158 pregnant women were considered healthy according to the results. There was no statistically significant difference between GDM and non-GDM groups in terms of age, height, TSH, T3, T4, b-hCG-mom, PAPP-A, PAPP-A-mom, uric acid and procalcitonin (p>0.05). The mean body weight, body mass index and HbA1c levels were higher and b-hCG levels were lower in the GDM group compared to the non-GDM group, and these findings were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of first trimester markers in GDM prediction seems to have no significance. There is a need for extensive, randomized studies with universal criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2399/prn.22.0302004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/prn.22.0302004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在鉴定妊娠早期可能与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)相关的标志物,并评价这些标志物是否可用于妊娠糖尿病的预测。方法:纳入2018年8月至2019年3月在大学医院申请的妊娠11 ~ 14周的孕妇。在评估期间进行体重指数计算和血液检查,包括全血细胞计数、TSH、T3、T4、HbA1c、尿酸、CRP、降钙素原、pap - a和b-hCG水平,然后在妊娠24至28周期间进行50克葡萄糖刺激试验。阳性结果的患者通过3小时100 g OGTT进一步评估。根据诊断试验结果,统计分析妊娠早期生化指标与BMI、GDM的关系。结果:182名孕妇参与了这项研究。54名妇女的葡萄糖激发试验(GCT)结果呈阳性,128名妇女的结果呈阴性。GCT结果阳性的孕妇接受3小时100 g OGTT, 24名孕妇诊断为GDM, 158名孕妇根据结果认为健康。GDM组与非GDM组患者年龄、身高、TSH、T3、T4、b-hCG-mom、PAPP-A、PAPP-A-mom、尿酸、降钙素原比较,差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。GDM组的平均体重、体重指数和HbA1c水平高于非GDM组,b-hCG水平低于非GDM组,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:妊娠早期标志物在GDM预测中的应用似乎没有意义。有必要进行广泛的、具有普遍标准的随机研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester: is it possible?
Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the first trimester markers that may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to evaluate whether those markers might be used for prediction of gestational diabetes or not. Methods: Pregnant women between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation applying to the university hospital between August 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Body mass index calculation and blood tests including complete blood count, TSH, T3, T4, HbA1c, uric acid, CRP, procalcitonin, PAPP-A and b-hCG levels were done during assessment followed by 50 grams of glucose challenge test between the 24 and 28 weeks of gestation for each woman. Patients with positive results were further evaluated with a 3-hour, 100-g OGTT. According to the diagnostic test results, the relationship between biochemical markers during the first trimester, BMI and GDM was statistically analyzed. Results: A hundred and eighty-two pregnant women participated in the study. Fifty-four women had positive glucose challenge test (GCT) results while 128 women had negative results. Pregnant women with positive GCT results underwent 3-hour, 100-g OGTT and, 24 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM, while 158 pregnant women were considered healthy according to the results. There was no statistically significant difference between GDM and non-GDM groups in terms of age, height, TSH, T3, T4, b-hCG-mom, PAPP-A, PAPP-A-mom, uric acid and procalcitonin (p>0.05). The mean body weight, body mass index and HbA1c levels were higher and b-hCG levels were lower in the GDM group compared to the non-GDM group, and these findings were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of first trimester markers in GDM prediction seems to have no significance. There is a need for extensive, randomized studies with universal criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信