腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的适当出院时间:术后第 1 天与第 2 天出院方案的比较。

Jae Woo Park, Munjin Kim, Sang Kuon Lee
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的适当出院时间:术后第 1 天与第 2 天出院方案的比较。","authors":"Jae Woo Park, Munjin Kim, Sang Kuon Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The critical pathway (CP) was introduced as a means to provide quality healthcare service in many fields of surgery. CP may increase the patient's satisfaction rate and lowering hospital stay and medical cost also. We aimed to compare the two kinds of CP applied in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients by different hospital stay length.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2016 to October 2016, 71 patients were enrolled in this analysis among 241 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups, 38 patients in the 1-day CP group and 33 patients in the 2-day CP group. In a retrospective review, surgical outcomes and related hospital costs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative characteristics were not different between two CP groups. In analysis of operative outcome, 2-day CP group showed longer operative time than 1-day CP (73.4 vs 54.1 min, <i>p</i><0.001); otherwise, there was no significant difference in frequency of postop complications (6.1% vs 2.6%, <i>p</i>=0.474), numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score (1.82 vs 2.16, <i>p</i>=0.052), and count of analgesics injection (0.12 vs 0.16, <i>p</i>=0.754). Total admission cost and actual patient's expenditures were higher in 2-day CP group, but there was no statistically significant difference (347.04 vs 306.69×10<sup>4</sup> won, <i>p</i>=0.106; 147.85 vs 125.58×10<sup>4</sup> won, <i>p</i>=0.276).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The length of hospital stay was shortened in 1-day CP group than in 2-day CP group, while there was no difference in other parameters. Therefore, it is feasible and safe practical policy the use 1-day CP in selected patients who undergo cholecystectomy according to our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":81438,"journal":{"name":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","volume":"33 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate Hospital Discharge Timing after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Postoperative Day 1 vs. Day 2 Discharge Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Woo Park, Munjin Kim, Sang Kuon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The critical pathway (CP) was introduced as a means to provide quality healthcare service in many fields of surgery. CP may increase the patient's satisfaction rate and lowering hospital stay and medical cost also. We aimed to compare the two kinds of CP applied in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients by different hospital stay length.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2016 to October 2016, 71 patients were enrolled in this analysis among 241 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups, 38 patients in the 1-day CP group and 33 patients in the 2-day CP group. In a retrospective review, surgical outcomes and related hospital costs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative characteristics were not different between two CP groups. In analysis of operative outcome, 2-day CP group showed longer operative time than 1-day CP (73.4 vs 54.1 min, <i>p</i><0.001); otherwise, there was no significant difference in frequency of postop complications (6.1% vs 2.6%, <i>p</i>=0.474), numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score (1.82 vs 2.16, <i>p</i>=0.052), and count of analgesics injection (0.12 vs 0.16, <i>p</i>=0.754). Total admission cost and actual patient's expenditures were higher in 2-day CP group, but there was no statistically significant difference (347.04 vs 306.69×10<sup>4</sup> won, <i>p</i>=0.106; 147.85 vs 125.58×10<sup>4</sup> won, <i>p</i>=0.276).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The length of hospital stay was shortened in 1-day CP group than in 2-day CP group, while there was no difference in other parameters. Therefore, it is feasible and safe practical policy the use 1-day CP in selected patients who undergo cholecystectomy according to our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"69-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980169/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关键路径(CP)是在许多外科领域提供优质医疗服务的一种手段。关键路径可提高患者满意度,缩短住院时间,降低医疗费用。我们旨在通过不同的住院时间,比较两种应用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的 CP:从 2016 年 3 月至 2016 年 10 月,在 241 名接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,有 71 名患者被纳入本次分析。患者分为两组,1 天 CP 组 38 例,2 天 CP 组 33 例。在一项回顾性研究中,对手术结果和相关住院费用进行了分析:两组 CP 患者的术前特征无差异。在手术结果分析中,2 天 CP 组的手术时间(73.4 分钟 vs 54.1 分钟,pp=0.474)、数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分(1.82 vs 2.16,pp=0.052)和镇痛剂注射次数(0.12 vs 0.16,pp=0.754)均长于 1 天 CP 组。入院总费用和患者实际支出在 2 天 CP 组较高,但差异无统计学意义(347.04 vs 306.69×104 韩元,P=0.106;147.85 vs 125.58×104 韩元,P=0.276):结论:CP 1 天组的住院时间比 CP 2 天组短,而其他参数没有差异。因此,根据我们的研究结果,在选定的胆囊切除术患者中使用 1 天 CP 是可行且安全的实用政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriate Hospital Discharge Timing after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Postoperative Day 1 vs. Day 2 Discharge Protocol.

Purpose: The critical pathway (CP) was introduced as a means to provide quality healthcare service in many fields of surgery. CP may increase the patient's satisfaction rate and lowering hospital stay and medical cost also. We aimed to compare the two kinds of CP applied in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients by different hospital stay length.

Methods: From March 2016 to October 2016, 71 patients were enrolled in this analysis among 241 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups, 38 patients in the 1-day CP group and 33 patients in the 2-day CP group. In a retrospective review, surgical outcomes and related hospital costs were analyzed.

Results: Preoperative characteristics were not different between two CP groups. In analysis of operative outcome, 2-day CP group showed longer operative time than 1-day CP (73.4 vs 54.1 min, p<0.001); otherwise, there was no significant difference in frequency of postop complications (6.1% vs 2.6%, p=0.474), numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score (1.82 vs 2.16, p=0.052), and count of analgesics injection (0.12 vs 0.16, p=0.754). Total admission cost and actual patient's expenditures were higher in 2-day CP group, but there was no statistically significant difference (347.04 vs 306.69×104 won, p=0.106; 147.85 vs 125.58×104 won, p=0.276).

Conclusion: The length of hospital stay was shortened in 1-day CP group than in 2-day CP group, while there was no difference in other parameters. Therefore, it is feasible and safe practical policy the use 1-day CP in selected patients who undergo cholecystectomy according to our results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信