社会与空间模式:厄瓜多尔基多市两个公共空间的比较研究

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 URBAN STUDIES
Verónica Gabriela Vaca-Proaño, C. López-Rueda, Néstor Andrés Llorca-Vega, Enrique Ferreras-Cid
{"title":"社会与空间模式:厄瓜多尔基多市两个公共空间的比较研究","authors":"Verónica Gabriela Vaca-Proaño, C. López-Rueda, Néstor Andrés Llorca-Vega, Enrique Ferreras-Cid","doi":"10.22320/07183607.2023.26.47.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The public space is the ideal scenario to analyze and evaluate the correlation between behavior and morphological conditioning factors in the urban structure. This relationship between the behavior of inhabitants and the spatial configuration is experienced as a social result. From this perspective, the success of urban design is perceived from the capacity it has to reconcile spatial conditions with the alternatives it allows for collective relations, from a close and bidirectional relationship. According to urban studies on morphological approaches, from the second half of the twentieth century two formal configurations are recognized: first, one identified as the traditional city layout, understanding cities as interconnected structures of buildings, with the gaps between them forming the blocks; second, the so-called functionalist, whose configuration of buildings includes a free and isolated arrangement in space, generating undefined layouts (Carmona, 2010, p. 77). This research presents a comparative analysis study for public spaces, which combines studies related to the city’s type-morphology and crucial treatises on behavior in public spaces. Spatial and behavioral patterns are evaluated in two areas in the city of Quito, Ecuador: on one hand, a square in the Historic Center with a traditional layout: Plaza \"La Merced\"; and on the other, an urban space with a functionalist layout: Plaza \"La República\". The study focuses on the generation of diagnostic information that comes directly from the observation of social behavior and the analysis of the morphological elements of the studied space. Finally, this study contrasts the review of specific spatial conditions of a place with the behavioral dynamics of its inhabitants.","PeriodicalId":47074,"journal":{"name":"Eure-Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patrones sociales y espaciales: Estudio comparativo entre dos espacios públicos en la ciudad de Quito, Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"Verónica Gabriela Vaca-Proaño, C. López-Rueda, Néstor Andrés Llorca-Vega, Enrique Ferreras-Cid\",\"doi\":\"10.22320/07183607.2023.26.47.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The public space is the ideal scenario to analyze and evaluate the correlation between behavior and morphological conditioning factors in the urban structure. This relationship between the behavior of inhabitants and the spatial configuration is experienced as a social result. From this perspective, the success of urban design is perceived from the capacity it has to reconcile spatial conditions with the alternatives it allows for collective relations, from a close and bidirectional relationship. According to urban studies on morphological approaches, from the second half of the twentieth century two formal configurations are recognized: first, one identified as the traditional city layout, understanding cities as interconnected structures of buildings, with the gaps between them forming the blocks; second, the so-called functionalist, whose configuration of buildings includes a free and isolated arrangement in space, generating undefined layouts (Carmona, 2010, p. 77). This research presents a comparative analysis study for public spaces, which combines studies related to the city’s type-morphology and crucial treatises on behavior in public spaces. Spatial and behavioral patterns are evaluated in two areas in the city of Quito, Ecuador: on one hand, a square in the Historic Center with a traditional layout: Plaza \\\"La Merced\\\"; and on the other, an urban space with a functionalist layout: Plaza \\\"La República\\\". The study focuses on the generation of diagnostic information that comes directly from the observation of social behavior and the analysis of the morphological elements of the studied space. Finally, this study contrasts the review of specific spatial conditions of a place with the behavioral dynamics of its inhabitants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eure-Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eure-Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22320/07183607.2023.26.47.08\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eure-Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22320/07183607.2023.26.47.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共空间是分析和评价城市结构中行为与形态制约因素之间关系的理想场景。居民的行为和空间结构之间的关系是一种社会结果。从这个角度来看,城市设计的成功在于它有能力调和空间条件和它允许的集体关系的选择,从一个密切的和双向的关系。根据城市形态学方法的研究,从20世纪下半叶开始,人们认识到两种正式的形态:一种是传统的城市布局,将城市理解为相互连接的建筑结构,它们之间的间隙形成街区;第二种是所谓的功能主义者,他们对建筑的配置包括自由和孤立的空间安排,产生未定义的布局(Carmona, 2010, p. 77)。本研究是一项公共空间的比较分析研究,结合了城市类型形态学的相关研究和公共空间行为的重要论文。在厄瓜多尔基多市的两个区域对空间和行为模式进行了评估:一方面,历史中心的一个广场具有传统的布局:La Merced广场;另一方面,一个具有功能主义布局的城市空间:La República广场。研究的重点是直接从观察社会行为和分析研究空间的形态要素中产生诊断信息。最后,本研究对比了一个地方的特定空间条件的审查与其居民的行为动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patrones sociales y espaciales: Estudio comparativo entre dos espacios públicos en la ciudad de Quito, Ecuador
The public space is the ideal scenario to analyze and evaluate the correlation between behavior and morphological conditioning factors in the urban structure. This relationship between the behavior of inhabitants and the spatial configuration is experienced as a social result. From this perspective, the success of urban design is perceived from the capacity it has to reconcile spatial conditions with the alternatives it allows for collective relations, from a close and bidirectional relationship. According to urban studies on morphological approaches, from the second half of the twentieth century two formal configurations are recognized: first, one identified as the traditional city layout, understanding cities as interconnected structures of buildings, with the gaps between them forming the blocks; second, the so-called functionalist, whose configuration of buildings includes a free and isolated arrangement in space, generating undefined layouts (Carmona, 2010, p. 77). This research presents a comparative analysis study for public spaces, which combines studies related to the city’s type-morphology and crucial treatises on behavior in public spaces. Spatial and behavioral patterns are evaluated in two areas in the city of Quito, Ecuador: on one hand, a square in the Historic Center with a traditional layout: Plaza "La Merced"; and on the other, an urban space with a functionalist layout: Plaza "La República". The study focuses on the generation of diagnostic information that comes directly from the observation of social behavior and the analysis of the morphological elements of the studied space. Finally, this study contrasts the review of specific spatial conditions of a place with the behavioral dynamics of its inhabitants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信