一项系统的文献综述,探讨通过“替代提供”重新融入中学主流学校的促进因素和障碍

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Chynna Owen, K. Woods, Andy Stewart
{"title":"一项系统的文献综述,探讨通过“替代提供”重新融入中学主流学校的促进因素和障碍","authors":"Chynna Owen, K. Woods, Andy Stewart","doi":"10.1080/13632752.2021.1963119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This systematic review synthesises the existing research evidence regarding the experiences of young people reintegrated to a mainstream secondary school (MSS) through alternative provision (AP), following permanent exclusion. Eight studies, including one international study, were critically appraised and synthesised following PRISMA guidelines. Three global themes were identified: outcomes of reintegration; factors that support reintegration (facilitators); factors that limit reintegration success (barriers). Findings were configured into a chronological reintegration journey model that outlines the facilitating and limiting factors at three specific stages of the reintegration process: AP support; reintegration planning; reintegration and MSS support. Bringing together multiple stakeholder perspectives from a variety of data sources, this model can serve as a framework for practitioners involved within the reintegration process. This review evidences variability in the methodological quality of the reintegration research evidence and outlines recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":46308,"journal":{"name":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","volume":"14 1","pages":"322 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review exploring the facilitators and barriers of reintegration to secondary mainstream schools through ‘alternative provision’\",\"authors\":\"Chynna Owen, K. Woods, Andy Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632752.2021.1963119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This systematic review synthesises the existing research evidence regarding the experiences of young people reintegrated to a mainstream secondary school (MSS) through alternative provision (AP), following permanent exclusion. Eight studies, including one international study, were critically appraised and synthesised following PRISMA guidelines. Three global themes were identified: outcomes of reintegration; factors that support reintegration (facilitators); factors that limit reintegration success (barriers). Findings were configured into a chronological reintegration journey model that outlines the facilitating and limiting factors at three specific stages of the reintegration process: AP support; reintegration planning; reintegration and MSS support. Bringing together multiple stakeholder perspectives from a variety of data sources, this model can serve as a framework for practitioners involved within the reintegration process. This review evidences variability in the methodological quality of the reintegration research evidence and outlines recommendations for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"322 - 338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2021.1963119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2021.1963119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇系统综述综合了现有的研究证据,这些证据是关于年轻人在被永久排斥后,通过替代提供(AP)重新融入主流中学(MSS)的经历。八项研究,包括一项国际研究,按照PRISMA的指导方针进行了严格的评估和综合。确定了三个全球主题:重新融入社会的结果;支持重返社会的因素(促进者);限制重返社会成功的因素(障碍)。研究结果被配置成一个按时间顺序重新融入社会的旅程模型,该模型概述了在重新融入社会过程的三个特定阶段的促进和限制因素:AP支持;重规划;重返社会和支助社会保障部门。该模型汇集了来自各种数据源的多个利益相关者的观点,可以作为参与重新整合过程的从业者的框架。这篇综述证明了重返社会研究证据的方法学质量的可变性,并概述了对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic literature review exploring the facilitators and barriers of reintegration to secondary mainstream schools through ‘alternative provision’
ABSTRACT This systematic review synthesises the existing research evidence regarding the experiences of young people reintegrated to a mainstream secondary school (MSS) through alternative provision (AP), following permanent exclusion. Eight studies, including one international study, were critically appraised and synthesised following PRISMA guidelines. Three global themes were identified: outcomes of reintegration; factors that support reintegration (facilitators); factors that limit reintegration success (barriers). Findings were configured into a chronological reintegration journey model that outlines the facilitating and limiting factors at three specific stages of the reintegration process: AP support; reintegration planning; reintegration and MSS support. Bringing together multiple stakeholder perspectives from a variety of data sources, this model can serve as a framework for practitioners involved within the reintegration process. This review evidences variability in the methodological quality of the reintegration research evidence and outlines recommendations for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The central intention of Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties (EBDs) is to contribute to readers" understanding of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties, and also their knowledge of appropriate ways of preventing and responding to EBDs, in terms of intervention and policy. The journal aims to cater for a wide audience, in response to the diverse nature of the professionals who work with and for children with EBDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信