装配回流工艺及PCB设计对WLCSP可靠性的影响研究

Y. Liu, Qiuxiao Qian, S. Qu, S. Martin, O. Jeon
{"title":"装配回流工艺及PCB设计对WLCSP可靠性的影响研究","authors":"Y. Liu, Qiuxiao Qian, S. Qu, S. Martin, O. Jeon","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2012.6248952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive FEA modeling was applied to the investigation of early solder joint failures of WLCSP mounted on test PCBs. In particular, stress in assembly reflow process was studied with 25 balls; 0.4 mm pitch WLCSP and PCBs with specially placed plated though vias. The 25 ball WLCSP in the study has 5×5 ball array, which corresponds to 16 outmost solder joints and nine inner solder joints, all soldered to the matching copper pads on the test PCB. Three PCB designs were modeled to understand the impact of PCB through via arrangement on stresses in solder joints during assembly reflow process: design #1 has no PCB through vias at all; design #2 has plated through vias under nine inner PCB copper pads; design #3 has plated through vias under all 25 PCB copper pads. The modeling results disclose that PCB design #2 with plated through vias under nine inner PCB copper pads induces the highest solder stress in all three models. Contrary to common sense of higher stress on corner solder joints due to coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch of silicon and PCB, the maximum stresses of design #2 actually occur on the inner solder joints. The simulation results match well with experimental observations. For PCB design #1 and #3, highest solder stress is lower than stress in design #2. In addition, in both cases, the maximum stress locates on the corner solder joints. New PCB design guidelines have since been implemented based on the simulation. Due to the improvement of the design, premature solder joint failure has not been recorded.","PeriodicalId":6384,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"959-964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the assembly reflow process and PCB design on the reliability of WLCSP\",\"authors\":\"Y. Liu, Qiuxiao Qian, S. Qu, S. Martin, O. Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2012.6248952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intensive FEA modeling was applied to the investigation of early solder joint failures of WLCSP mounted on test PCBs. In particular, stress in assembly reflow process was studied with 25 balls; 0.4 mm pitch WLCSP and PCBs with specially placed plated though vias. The 25 ball WLCSP in the study has 5×5 ball array, which corresponds to 16 outmost solder joints and nine inner solder joints, all soldered to the matching copper pads on the test PCB. Three PCB designs were modeled to understand the impact of PCB through via arrangement on stresses in solder joints during assembly reflow process: design #1 has no PCB through vias at all; design #2 has plated through vias under nine inner PCB copper pads; design #3 has plated through vias under all 25 PCB copper pads. The modeling results disclose that PCB design #2 with plated through vias under nine inner PCB copper pads induces the highest solder stress in all three models. Contrary to common sense of higher stress on corner solder joints due to coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch of silicon and PCB, the maximum stresses of design #2 actually occur on the inner solder joints. The simulation results match well with experimental observations. For PCB design #1 and #3, highest solder stress is lower than stress in design #2. In addition, in both cases, the maximum stress locates on the corner solder joints. New PCB design guidelines have since been implemented based on the simulation. Due to the improvement of the design, premature solder joint failure has not been recorded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"959-964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2012.6248952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2012.6248952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

采用深入的有限元分析方法,对安装在测试电路板上的WLCSP的早期焊点失效进行了研究。特别研究了25个钢球在装配回流过程中的应力;0.4毫米间距的WLCSP和pcb,特别放置的电镀通孔。研究中的25球WLCSP具有5×5球阵,对应16个最外焊点和9个内焊点,全部焊接到测试PCB上匹配的铜垫上。我们对三种PCB设计进行了建模,以了解PCB通孔布置对组装回流过程中焊点应力的影响:设计#1根本没有PCB通孔;设计#2在九个内部PCB铜衬垫下镀有通孔;设计#3在所有25个PCB铜衬垫下镀过孔。建模结果表明,PCB设计#2在九个内部PCB铜衬垫下镀通孔,在所有三种模型中产生最高的焊接应力。通常情况下,由于硅和PCB的热膨胀系数(CTE)不匹配,转角焊点的应力较高,而设计#2的最大应力实际上发生在内部焊点上。仿真结果与实验结果吻合较好。对于PCB设计#1和#3,最高焊料应力低于设计#2中的应力。此外,在这两种情况下,最大应力位于拐角焊点上。新的PCB设计准则已经基于仿真实现。由于设计的改进,没有记录过早的焊点失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of the assembly reflow process and PCB design on the reliability of WLCSP
Intensive FEA modeling was applied to the investigation of early solder joint failures of WLCSP mounted on test PCBs. In particular, stress in assembly reflow process was studied with 25 balls; 0.4 mm pitch WLCSP and PCBs with specially placed plated though vias. The 25 ball WLCSP in the study has 5×5 ball array, which corresponds to 16 outmost solder joints and nine inner solder joints, all soldered to the matching copper pads on the test PCB. Three PCB designs were modeled to understand the impact of PCB through via arrangement on stresses in solder joints during assembly reflow process: design #1 has no PCB through vias at all; design #2 has plated through vias under nine inner PCB copper pads; design #3 has plated through vias under all 25 PCB copper pads. The modeling results disclose that PCB design #2 with plated through vias under nine inner PCB copper pads induces the highest solder stress in all three models. Contrary to common sense of higher stress on corner solder joints due to coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch of silicon and PCB, the maximum stresses of design #2 actually occur on the inner solder joints. The simulation results match well with experimental observations. For PCB design #1 and #3, highest solder stress is lower than stress in design #2. In addition, in both cases, the maximum stress locates on the corner solder joints. New PCB design guidelines have since been implemented based on the simulation. Due to the improvement of the design, premature solder joint failure has not been recorded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信