陈恺:写作的政治与诗学

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
David Ward
{"title":"陈恺:写作的政治与诗学","authors":"David Ward","doi":"10.5406/23256672.99.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Beginning with the group's involvement with Wu Ming's Ti chiamerò Russell: Romanzo totale 2002, this article examines the writing collective Kai Zen's open- and closed-participation writing projects, focusing on the similarities and differences between the two collectives’ approaches. The article argues that Kai Zen's greater adherence to popular literary genres, such as science fiction, the western and the romanzo rosa, gives priority to the outcome of the collective writing enterprise, that is, the writing itself, rather than to the collective authors. The article concludes by drawing connections between collective writing as a prelude to collective political action.","PeriodicalId":29826,"journal":{"name":"Italica Belgradensia","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kai Zen: The Politics and the Poetics of Writing\",\"authors\":\"David Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/23256672.99.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Beginning with the group's involvement with Wu Ming's Ti chiamerò Russell: Romanzo totale 2002, this article examines the writing collective Kai Zen's open- and closed-participation writing projects, focusing on the similarities and differences between the two collectives’ approaches. The article argues that Kai Zen's greater adherence to popular literary genres, such as science fiction, the western and the romanzo rosa, gives priority to the outcome of the collective writing enterprise, that is, the writing itself, rather than to the collective authors. The article concludes by drawing connections between collective writing as a prelude to collective political action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italica Belgradensia\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italica Belgradensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/23256672.99.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italica Belgradensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23256672.99.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从该团体参与吴明的《Ti chiamerò Russell: Romanzo totale 2002》开始,考察了“启禅”写作集体的开放参与和封闭参与的写作项目,重点分析了这两个集体在写作方式上的异同。本文认为,禅宗对科幻小说、西文小说、罗曼佐罗萨小说等通俗文学体裁的坚持,优先考虑的是集体写作事业的结果,即写作本身,而不是集体作者。文章最后通过将集体写作作为集体政治行动的前奏之间的联系进行总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kai Zen: The Politics and the Poetics of Writing
Beginning with the group's involvement with Wu Ming's Ti chiamerò Russell: Romanzo totale 2002, this article examines the writing collective Kai Zen's open- and closed-participation writing projects, focusing on the similarities and differences between the two collectives’ approaches. The article argues that Kai Zen's greater adherence to popular literary genres, such as science fiction, the western and the romanzo rosa, gives priority to the outcome of the collective writing enterprise, that is, the writing itself, rather than to the collective authors. The article concludes by drawing connections between collective writing as a prelude to collective political action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信