{"title":"为什么要让你的工程课程获得认证?","authors":"P. Goodhew","doi":"10.4018/ijqaete.2012040109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries engineering degree programmes can be submitted for\naccreditation by a professional body and/or graduate engineers can be certified\nor registered. Where this is available most academic institutions feel that\nthey must offer accredited engineering programmes. I suggest that these\nprocesses are at best ineffective (they do not achieve their aims) and at worst\nthey are destructive of creativity, innovation and confidence in the academic\ncommunity. I wish to argue that such processes (including any internal\ncertification within CDIO) should be abandoned completely. I will propose\nalternative ways of maintaining the quality of engineering design and\nmanufacture, which place the responsibility where it properly lies – with the\nmanufacturer or contractor.","PeriodicalId":13684,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Get Your Engineering Programme Accredited?\",\"authors\":\"P. Goodhew\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijqaete.2012040109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many countries engineering degree programmes can be submitted for\\naccreditation by a professional body and/or graduate engineers can be certified\\nor registered. Where this is available most academic institutions feel that\\nthey must offer accredited engineering programmes. I suggest that these\\nprocesses are at best ineffective (they do not achieve their aims) and at worst\\nthey are destructive of creativity, innovation and confidence in the academic\\ncommunity. I wish to argue that such processes (including any internal\\ncertification within CDIO) should be abandoned completely. I will propose\\nalternative ways of maintaining the quality of engineering design and\\nmanufacture, which place the responsibility where it properly lies – with the\\nmanufacturer or contractor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012040109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012040109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In many countries engineering degree programmes can be submitted for
accreditation by a professional body and/or graduate engineers can be certified
or registered. Where this is available most academic institutions feel that
they must offer accredited engineering programmes. I suggest that these
processes are at best ineffective (they do not achieve their aims) and at worst
they are destructive of creativity, innovation and confidence in the academic
community. I wish to argue that such processes (including any internal
certification within CDIO) should be abandoned completely. I will propose
alternative ways of maintaining the quality of engineering design and
manufacture, which place the responsibility where it properly lies – with the
manufacturer or contractor.