“颠倒的伊甸园”:达西·克雷斯韦尔《森林》中的现代性与反现代主义

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Erin G. Carlston
{"title":"“颠倒的伊甸园”:达西·克雷斯韦尔《森林》中的现代性与反现代主义","authors":"Erin G. Carlston","doi":"10.3366/mod.2020.0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1952, D'Arcy Cresswell published a verse play, The Forest, set in New Zealand's forested Southern Alps. In what Cresswell called a ‘tremendous defense of homosexuality’, The Forest depicts a pair of gay male poets pitted against the archangel Lucifer and women, who are in league together to force men to work the land and thereby desacralize it. Cresswell argues that the pressures on Pākehā men to be economically productive and heterosexually reproductive are manifestations of a literally Satanic plot to alienate men from one another and Nature. While many of Cresswell's New Zealand literary contemporaries espoused a Pākehā masculinity involving matey comradeship and a life spent working the land, Cresswell celebrates a New Zealand wilderness he perceives as the last refuge of male love and inspired poetry. Simultaneously queering Milton, inverting Judeo-Christian history by relocating Eden in the Antipodes, and reversing New Zealand history by undoing the modernity that settler colonialism had created, Cresswell counters the terms of his own exclusion from the literary canon by imagining a world upside-down – and inside-out.","PeriodicalId":41937,"journal":{"name":"Modernist Cultures","volume":"86 1","pages":"341-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘An Inverted Eden’: Modernity and Anti-Modernism in D'Arcy Cresswell's The Forest\",\"authors\":\"Erin G. Carlston\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/mod.2020.0300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1952, D'Arcy Cresswell published a verse play, The Forest, set in New Zealand's forested Southern Alps. In what Cresswell called a ‘tremendous defense of homosexuality’, The Forest depicts a pair of gay male poets pitted against the archangel Lucifer and women, who are in league together to force men to work the land and thereby desacralize it. Cresswell argues that the pressures on Pākehā men to be economically productive and heterosexually reproductive are manifestations of a literally Satanic plot to alienate men from one another and Nature. While many of Cresswell's New Zealand literary contemporaries espoused a Pākehā masculinity involving matey comradeship and a life spent working the land, Cresswell celebrates a New Zealand wilderness he perceives as the last refuge of male love and inspired poetry. Simultaneously queering Milton, inverting Judeo-Christian history by relocating Eden in the Antipodes, and reversing New Zealand history by undoing the modernity that settler colonialism had created, Cresswell counters the terms of his own exclusion from the literary canon by imagining a world upside-down – and inside-out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modernist Cultures\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"341-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modernist Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2020.0300\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernist Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2020.0300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1952年,达西·克雷斯韦尔出版了诗剧《森林》,故事发生在新西兰森林茂密的南阿尔卑斯山。在克雷斯韦尔所谓的“对同性恋的巨大辩护”中,《森林》描绘了一对男同性恋诗人与天使长路西法和女人的对抗,他们联合起来强迫男人在土地上劳作,从而使土地失去神圣化。克雷斯韦尔认为,Pākehā男性在经济上的生产力和异性性生殖方面的压力是撒旦阴谋的表现,它使男性与彼此和自然疏远。与克雷斯韦尔同时代的许多新西兰文学界人士都推崇一种Pākehā男子气概,这种男子气概包括亲密的同志关系和在土地上劳作的一生,而克雷斯韦尔则颂扬新西兰的荒野,他认为这是男性爱情和灵感诗歌的最后避难所。与此同时,克雷斯韦尔颠覆了弥尔顿,通过将伊甸园重新安置在对跖点,颠倒了犹太教和基督教的历史,通过推翻定居者殖民主义所创造的现代性,颠倒了新西兰的历史,他通过想象一个颠倒的世界来对抗自己被排除在文学经典之外的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘An Inverted Eden’: Modernity and Anti-Modernism in D'Arcy Cresswell's The Forest
In 1952, D'Arcy Cresswell published a verse play, The Forest, set in New Zealand's forested Southern Alps. In what Cresswell called a ‘tremendous defense of homosexuality’, The Forest depicts a pair of gay male poets pitted against the archangel Lucifer and women, who are in league together to force men to work the land and thereby desacralize it. Cresswell argues that the pressures on Pākehā men to be economically productive and heterosexually reproductive are manifestations of a literally Satanic plot to alienate men from one another and Nature. While many of Cresswell's New Zealand literary contemporaries espoused a Pākehā masculinity involving matey comradeship and a life spent working the land, Cresswell celebrates a New Zealand wilderness he perceives as the last refuge of male love and inspired poetry. Simultaneously queering Milton, inverting Judeo-Christian history by relocating Eden in the Antipodes, and reversing New Zealand history by undoing the modernity that settler colonialism had created, Cresswell counters the terms of his own exclusion from the literary canon by imagining a world upside-down – and inside-out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modernist Cultures
Modernist Cultures HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信