遗嘱与表格

Lydia D. Goehr
{"title":"遗嘱与表格","authors":"Lydia D. Goehr","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197572443.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 5 brings Kierkegaard’s contrast of a joyful and dismal economics of thinking into contact with the writers of the Parisian bohème, and with Murger most of all. The transfiguration of the commonplace is now a constant reckoning with the marketplace. The common sign, often carved with a knife of prejudice, becomes a shared contribution to a philosophical furniture art and to a modern discourse on property as theft, where the deepest theft is of a person’s selfhood. An existential thesis dominates, whereby, through unresolved patterns and paradoxes about artworks and thoughts, artists and philosophers constantly turn back to how they are living their lives. The patterning turns borrowed materials into thoughts owned, into a property for the self. Once owned, how are the thoughts expressed to render them public for others, if keeping thoughts to oneself cannot be the answer for the one who chooses to be a writer? How does talk about owning one’s self become a claim of one’s liberation from an external possession experienced as a servitude, and with what social and artistic results?","PeriodicalId":62574,"journal":{"name":"红树林","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testament and Table\",\"authors\":\"Lydia D. Goehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197572443.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 5 brings Kierkegaard’s contrast of a joyful and dismal economics of thinking into contact with the writers of the Parisian bohème, and with Murger most of all. The transfiguration of the commonplace is now a constant reckoning with the marketplace. The common sign, often carved with a knife of prejudice, becomes a shared contribution to a philosophical furniture art and to a modern discourse on property as theft, where the deepest theft is of a person’s selfhood. An existential thesis dominates, whereby, through unresolved patterns and paradoxes about artworks and thoughts, artists and philosophers constantly turn back to how they are living their lives. The patterning turns borrowed materials into thoughts owned, into a property for the self. Once owned, how are the thoughts expressed to render them public for others, if keeping thoughts to oneself cannot be the answer for the one who chooses to be a writer? How does talk about owning one’s self become a claim of one’s liberation from an external possession experienced as a servitude, and with what social and artistic results?\",\"PeriodicalId\":62574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"红树林\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"红树林\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197572443.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"红树林","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197572443.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第五章将克尔凯郭尔关于快乐和忧郁的经济学思想的对比与巴黎《boh》的作者联系起来,尤其是与穆尔格。如今,对平凡事物的改造是对市场的不断清算。通常用偏见之刀雕刻的常见标志,成为哲学家具艺术和现代财产盗窃话语的共同贡献,其中最深刻的盗窃是一个人的自我。一个存在主义命题占据了主导地位,由此,通过关于艺术和思想的未解决的模式和悖论,艺术家和哲学家不断地回到他们是如何生活的。这种模式把借来的材料变成了自己拥有的思想,变成了自己的财产。如果对一个选择成为作家的人来说,把自己的想法藏在心里并不能解决问题,那么,自己的想法一旦拥有,又该如何表达才能让别人知道呢?谈论拥有一个人的自我如何成为一个人从被奴役的外在占有中解放出来的主张,并产生了什么样的社会和艺术结果?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testament and Table
Chapter 5 brings Kierkegaard’s contrast of a joyful and dismal economics of thinking into contact with the writers of the Parisian bohème, and with Murger most of all. The transfiguration of the commonplace is now a constant reckoning with the marketplace. The common sign, often carved with a knife of prejudice, becomes a shared contribution to a philosophical furniture art and to a modern discourse on property as theft, where the deepest theft is of a person’s selfhood. An existential thesis dominates, whereby, through unresolved patterns and paradoxes about artworks and thoughts, artists and philosophers constantly turn back to how they are living their lives. The patterning turns borrowed materials into thoughts owned, into a property for the self. Once owned, how are the thoughts expressed to render them public for others, if keeping thoughts to oneself cannot be the answer for the one who chooses to be a writer? How does talk about owning one’s self become a claim of one’s liberation from an external possession experienced as a servitude, and with what social and artistic results?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信