增加了肿瘤TRAIL敏感性的维度

Sandra Healy, L. O’Leary, E. Szegezdi
{"title":"增加了肿瘤TRAIL敏感性的维度","authors":"Sandra Healy, L. O’Leary, E. Szegezdi","doi":"10.18632/ONCOSCIENCE.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the TNF cytokine family and a selective inducer of apoptosis in a range of tumour cells, but not in healthy normal, untransformed cells. It is expressed by natural killer cells and natural killer-T cells when they encounter malignantly transformed cells and it is a key effector molecule in tumour immune surveillance. TRAIL has 5 receptors, which is the highest receptor promiscuity in the TNF ligand family. It binds to death receptor 4 (DR4) or DR5 on the surface of target cells [1] and initiates a conformational change which promotes association of the receptors with FADD facilitating pro-caspase-8 and/or pro-caspase-10 recruitment which then activates effector caspases to execute cell death [2]. Signalling through DR4 and DR5 can also activate pro-inflammatory intracellular molecules such as MAPK, PKB and NF-κB and overexpression of DR4 or DR5 has been shown to stimulate the release of inflammatory cytokines [3]. However, TRAIL also has three regulatory receptors. Two of these, decoy receptor 1(DcR1) and DcR2 are membrane bound and the third regulatory receptor, osteoprotegerin is a secreted protein. DcRs regulate TRAIL-induced apoptosis by either sequestering TRAIL from the death receptors or by forming inactive, heteromeric DcR1/2–DR4/5 complexes [1]. Indeed, DcRs have been shown to be highly expressed in a number of tumour tissues such as acute myeloid leukaemia, prostate cancer and breast cancer and their expression is linked with poor prognosis [4]. However DcR expression in tumour cells does not correlate with TRAIL sensitivity and non-transformed cells do not require DcRs to be protected from TRAIL-induced apoptosis, suggesting that the in vivo role of the DcRs may be more complex than originally thought [5] \n \nThe tumor-specific cytotoxicity of TRAIL has been exploited as a therapeutic strategy by utilizing recombinant versions of TRAIL and agonistic antibodies against DR4 and DR5 [6]. While recombinant soluble human TRAIL was highly potent against a broad range of tumours in vitro and in pre-clinical studies, in clinical trials TRAIL has failed to exhibit the same potency [6]. One of the major shortcomings of the preclinical models was the lack of assessment of the contribution of the tumour microenvironment (TME). The TME consists of various cell types, soluble factors and signals from the extracellular matrix, and is in a reciprocal interaction with the tumour cells. It is thus important to understand the interplay of different cell types in the tumour microenvironment and the effect of the factors they express and secrete on tumour growth, development and resistance to therapy. \n \n \n \nFigure 1 \n \nCell autonomous and supracellular regulation of TRAIL-sensitivity by decoy receptor 1 (DcR1) and -2 \n \n \n \nThe study by O'Leary and colleagues explored the hypothesis that DcRs exerted a ‘supracellular level control’ of TRAIL-sensitivity rather than simply regulating TRAIL resistance at a cell-autonomous level [7]. They firstly examined the expression of the decoy receptors in tumour cells, tumour stroma and in non-malignant, tumour adjacent tissues. Interestingly they found that DcR1 and DcR2 are commonly expressed in tissues but tissue stroma only express DcR1. To determine whether DcR-expressing stromal cells influence the TRAIL sensitivity of tumour cells sharing the same microenvironment they generated and characterized DcR-insensitive TRAIL mutants and used a combination of mathematical modelling, cell based assays and a stroma/tumour co-culture system allowing them to model the effect of DcRs expressed by adjacent stromal cells on DR4/5 activation in tumour cells. They found that stromal DcRs profoundly reduced TRAIL-induced DR4/DR5 activation and protected tumour cells against TRAIL. The authors confirmed this finding in a 3D mixed-cell type (stroma-tumour) spheroid tumour model. Interestingly they also observed that TNF increased surface expression of the DcRs in fibroblasts raising the possibility that an inflammatory environment may induce DcR expression and promote TRAIL resistance. This study clearly demonstrates that stromal DcRs in the tumour microenvironment can exert trans-cellular regulation affecting tumour cells and it highlights the importance of developing therapeutic TRAIL variants that can selectively activate the two death inducing TRAIL receptors but are not mopped up by the decoy receptors present on stromal tissues. Future studies will hopefully establish a feed forward signalling loop that drives overall tissue sensitivity in order to achieve tumour eradication.","PeriodicalId":94164,"journal":{"name":"Oncoscience","volume":"9 1","pages":"906 - 907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An added dimension to tumour TRAIL sensitivity\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Healy, L. O’Leary, E. Szegezdi\",\"doi\":\"10.18632/ONCOSCIENCE.267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the TNF cytokine family and a selective inducer of apoptosis in a range of tumour cells, but not in healthy normal, untransformed cells. It is expressed by natural killer cells and natural killer-T cells when they encounter malignantly transformed cells and it is a key effector molecule in tumour immune surveillance. TRAIL has 5 receptors, which is the highest receptor promiscuity in the TNF ligand family. It binds to death receptor 4 (DR4) or DR5 on the surface of target cells [1] and initiates a conformational change which promotes association of the receptors with FADD facilitating pro-caspase-8 and/or pro-caspase-10 recruitment which then activates effector caspases to execute cell death [2]. Signalling through DR4 and DR5 can also activate pro-inflammatory intracellular molecules such as MAPK, PKB and NF-κB and overexpression of DR4 or DR5 has been shown to stimulate the release of inflammatory cytokines [3]. However, TRAIL also has three regulatory receptors. Two of these, decoy receptor 1(DcR1) and DcR2 are membrane bound and the third regulatory receptor, osteoprotegerin is a secreted protein. DcRs regulate TRAIL-induced apoptosis by either sequestering TRAIL from the death receptors or by forming inactive, heteromeric DcR1/2–DR4/5 complexes [1]. Indeed, DcRs have been shown to be highly expressed in a number of tumour tissues such as acute myeloid leukaemia, prostate cancer and breast cancer and their expression is linked with poor prognosis [4]. However DcR expression in tumour cells does not correlate with TRAIL sensitivity and non-transformed cells do not require DcRs to be protected from TRAIL-induced apoptosis, suggesting that the in vivo role of the DcRs may be more complex than originally thought [5] \\n \\nThe tumor-specific cytotoxicity of TRAIL has been exploited as a therapeutic strategy by utilizing recombinant versions of TRAIL and agonistic antibodies against DR4 and DR5 [6]. While recombinant soluble human TRAIL was highly potent against a broad range of tumours in vitro and in pre-clinical studies, in clinical trials TRAIL has failed to exhibit the same potency [6]. One of the major shortcomings of the preclinical models was the lack of assessment of the contribution of the tumour microenvironment (TME). The TME consists of various cell types, soluble factors and signals from the extracellular matrix, and is in a reciprocal interaction with the tumour cells. It is thus important to understand the interplay of different cell types in the tumour microenvironment and the effect of the factors they express and secrete on tumour growth, development and resistance to therapy. \\n \\n \\n \\nFigure 1 \\n \\nCell autonomous and supracellular regulation of TRAIL-sensitivity by decoy receptor 1 (DcR1) and -2 \\n \\n \\n \\nThe study by O'Leary and colleagues explored the hypothesis that DcRs exerted a ‘supracellular level control’ of TRAIL-sensitivity rather than simply regulating TRAIL resistance at a cell-autonomous level [7]. They firstly examined the expression of the decoy receptors in tumour cells, tumour stroma and in non-malignant, tumour adjacent tissues. Interestingly they found that DcR1 and DcR2 are commonly expressed in tissues but tissue stroma only express DcR1. To determine whether DcR-expressing stromal cells influence the TRAIL sensitivity of tumour cells sharing the same microenvironment they generated and characterized DcR-insensitive TRAIL mutants and used a combination of mathematical modelling, cell based assays and a stroma/tumour co-culture system allowing them to model the effect of DcRs expressed by adjacent stromal cells on DR4/5 activation in tumour cells. They found that stromal DcRs profoundly reduced TRAIL-induced DR4/DR5 activation and protected tumour cells against TRAIL. The authors confirmed this finding in a 3D mixed-cell type (stroma-tumour) spheroid tumour model. Interestingly they also observed that TNF increased surface expression of the DcRs in fibroblasts raising the possibility that an inflammatory environment may induce DcR expression and promote TRAIL resistance. This study clearly demonstrates that stromal DcRs in the tumour microenvironment can exert trans-cellular regulation affecting tumour cells and it highlights the importance of developing therapeutic TRAIL variants that can selectively activate the two death inducing TRAIL receptors but are not mopped up by the decoy receptors present on stromal tissues. Future studies will hopefully establish a feed forward signalling loop that drives overall tissue sensitivity in order to achieve tumour eradication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncoscience\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"906 - 907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18632/ONCOSCIENCE.267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18632/ONCOSCIENCE.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)是TNF细胞因子家族的一员,是多种肿瘤细胞的选择性凋亡诱导剂,但在健康的正常未转化细胞中不存在。它由自然杀伤细胞和自然杀伤t细胞在遇到恶性转化细胞时表达,是肿瘤免疫监视的关键效应分子。TRAIL有5个受体,是TNF配体家族中受体混杂性最高的。它与靶细胞表面的死亡受体4 (DR4)或DR5结合[1],并引发构象变化,促进受体与FADD的结合,促进前caspase-8和/或前caspase-10的募集,然后激活效应caspase执行细胞死亡[2]。通过DR4和DR5的信号传导还可以激活细胞内促炎分子如MAPK、PKB和NF-κB,并且DR4或DR5的过表达已被证明可以刺激炎症细胞因子的释放[3]。然而,TRAIL也有三种调节受体。其中两个,诱饵受体1(DcR1)和DcR2是膜结合的,第三个调节受体,骨保护素是一种分泌蛋白。DcRs通过从死亡受体中分离TRAIL或形成非活性的异聚DcR1/2-DR4/5复合物来调节TRAIL诱导的细胞凋亡[1]。事实上,DcRs已被证明在许多肿瘤组织中高表达,如急性髓性白血病、前列腺癌和乳腺癌,其表达与预后不良有关[4]。然而,肿瘤细胞中的DcR表达与TRAIL敏感性无关,非转化细胞不需要保护DcR免受TRAIL诱导的细胞凋亡,这表明DcR在体内的作用可能比最初认为的要复杂[5]。TRAIL的肿瘤特异性细胞毒性已被利用为一种治疗策略,利用TRAIL的重组版本和针对DR4和DR5的激动抗体[6]。虽然在体外和临床前研究中,重组可溶性人TRAIL对多种肿瘤具有很强的效力,但在临床试验中,TRAIL未能表现出相同的效力[6]。临床前模型的主要缺点之一是缺乏对肿瘤微环境(TME)的贡献的评估。TME由各种细胞类型、可溶性因子和来自细胞外基质的信号组成,并与肿瘤细胞相互作用。因此,了解肿瘤微环境中不同细胞类型的相互作用以及它们表达和分泌的因子对肿瘤生长、发展和治疗耐药性的影响是很重要的。诱骗受体1 (DcR1)和-2对TRAIL敏感性的细胞自主和超细胞调控O' leary及其同事的研究探索了DcRs对TRAIL敏感性的“超细胞水平调控”,而不是简单地在细胞自主水平上调控TRAIL抗性的假设[7]。他们首先检测了诱饵受体在肿瘤细胞、肿瘤基质和非恶性肿瘤邻近组织中的表达。有趣的是,他们发现DcR1和DcR2在组织中普遍表达,但组织基质只表达DcR1。为了确定表达dcr的基质细胞是否影响共享相同微环境的肿瘤细胞的TRAIL敏感性,他们产生并表征了dcr不敏感的TRAIL突变体,并使用数学建模、基于细胞的测定和基质/肿瘤共培养系统的组合,使他们能够模拟相邻基质细胞表达的dcr对肿瘤细胞中DR4/5激活的影响。他们发现,基质dcr显著降低TRAIL诱导的DR4/DR5激活,并保护肿瘤细胞免受TRAIL的侵害。作者在三维混合细胞型(间质瘤)球形肿瘤模型中证实了这一发现。有趣的是,他们还观察到TNF增加了成纤维细胞中DcR的表面表达,这增加了炎症环境诱导DcR表达并促进TRAIL抵抗的可能性。这项研究清楚地表明,肿瘤微环境中的基质dcr可以发挥影响肿瘤细胞的跨细胞调节作用,并强调了开发治疗性TRAIL变体的重要性,这种变体可以选择性地激活两种诱导死亡的TRAIL受体,但不会被基质组织上存在的诱饵受体清除。未来的研究将有望建立一个前馈信号回路,驱动整体组织敏感性,以实现肿瘤根除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An added dimension to tumour TRAIL sensitivity
Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the TNF cytokine family and a selective inducer of apoptosis in a range of tumour cells, but not in healthy normal, untransformed cells. It is expressed by natural killer cells and natural killer-T cells when they encounter malignantly transformed cells and it is a key effector molecule in tumour immune surveillance. TRAIL has 5 receptors, which is the highest receptor promiscuity in the TNF ligand family. It binds to death receptor 4 (DR4) or DR5 on the surface of target cells [1] and initiates a conformational change which promotes association of the receptors with FADD facilitating pro-caspase-8 and/or pro-caspase-10 recruitment which then activates effector caspases to execute cell death [2]. Signalling through DR4 and DR5 can also activate pro-inflammatory intracellular molecules such as MAPK, PKB and NF-κB and overexpression of DR4 or DR5 has been shown to stimulate the release of inflammatory cytokines [3]. However, TRAIL also has three regulatory receptors. Two of these, decoy receptor 1(DcR1) and DcR2 are membrane bound and the third regulatory receptor, osteoprotegerin is a secreted protein. DcRs regulate TRAIL-induced apoptosis by either sequestering TRAIL from the death receptors or by forming inactive, heteromeric DcR1/2–DR4/5 complexes [1]. Indeed, DcRs have been shown to be highly expressed in a number of tumour tissues such as acute myeloid leukaemia, prostate cancer and breast cancer and their expression is linked with poor prognosis [4]. However DcR expression in tumour cells does not correlate with TRAIL sensitivity and non-transformed cells do not require DcRs to be protected from TRAIL-induced apoptosis, suggesting that the in vivo role of the DcRs may be more complex than originally thought [5] The tumor-specific cytotoxicity of TRAIL has been exploited as a therapeutic strategy by utilizing recombinant versions of TRAIL and agonistic antibodies against DR4 and DR5 [6]. While recombinant soluble human TRAIL was highly potent against a broad range of tumours in vitro and in pre-clinical studies, in clinical trials TRAIL has failed to exhibit the same potency [6]. One of the major shortcomings of the preclinical models was the lack of assessment of the contribution of the tumour microenvironment (TME). The TME consists of various cell types, soluble factors and signals from the extracellular matrix, and is in a reciprocal interaction with the tumour cells. It is thus important to understand the interplay of different cell types in the tumour microenvironment and the effect of the factors they express and secrete on tumour growth, development and resistance to therapy. Figure 1 Cell autonomous and supracellular regulation of TRAIL-sensitivity by decoy receptor 1 (DcR1) and -2 The study by O'Leary and colleagues explored the hypothesis that DcRs exerted a ‘supracellular level control’ of TRAIL-sensitivity rather than simply regulating TRAIL resistance at a cell-autonomous level [7]. They firstly examined the expression of the decoy receptors in tumour cells, tumour stroma and in non-malignant, tumour adjacent tissues. Interestingly they found that DcR1 and DcR2 are commonly expressed in tissues but tissue stroma only express DcR1. To determine whether DcR-expressing stromal cells influence the TRAIL sensitivity of tumour cells sharing the same microenvironment they generated and characterized DcR-insensitive TRAIL mutants and used a combination of mathematical modelling, cell based assays and a stroma/tumour co-culture system allowing them to model the effect of DcRs expressed by adjacent stromal cells on DR4/5 activation in tumour cells. They found that stromal DcRs profoundly reduced TRAIL-induced DR4/DR5 activation and protected tumour cells against TRAIL. The authors confirmed this finding in a 3D mixed-cell type (stroma-tumour) spheroid tumour model. Interestingly they also observed that TNF increased surface expression of the DcRs in fibroblasts raising the possibility that an inflammatory environment may induce DcR expression and promote TRAIL resistance. This study clearly demonstrates that stromal DcRs in the tumour microenvironment can exert trans-cellular regulation affecting tumour cells and it highlights the importance of developing therapeutic TRAIL variants that can selectively activate the two death inducing TRAIL receptors but are not mopped up by the decoy receptors present on stromal tissues. Future studies will hopefully establish a feed forward signalling loop that drives overall tissue sensitivity in order to achieve tumour eradication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信