多因素统计方法检测2型糖尿病危险因素的比较

ipek ek, Saim Lu, ibrahim ahin
{"title":"多因素统计方法检测2型糖尿病危险因素的比较","authors":"ipek ek, Saim Lu, ibrahim ahin","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The goal of this study is to compare the performances of Logistic Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Decision Tree models, which are machine learning classification methods, in the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and to determine the most successful method. It is also the examination of risk factors affecting Type 2 DM using these models. Method: The study's data was collected from patients who visited the Diabetes and Thyroid polyclinic at the Inonu University Faculty of Medicine Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine. The k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm, which is one of the missing value assignment methods, was used to eliminate the problems related to missing values. Sensitivity, accuracy, precision, specificity, AUC F1-score, and classification error were used as performance evaluation criteria. Evolutionary algorithm parameter optimization method was used to optimize the parameters of the ANN model. Missing value assignment, modeling and parameter optimization were done with Rapidminer Studio Free version 8.1. Results: Among the three methods applied in the diagnosis of Type 2 DM, the ANN gave the best classification performance. The accuracy, sensitivity, selectivity, precision, F1-score, AUC and classification error values obtained from this method are respectively; 98.94%, 100%, 97.73%, 98.04%, 99.01%, 0.978 and 1.06. For the ANN method, the importance values of the gender, long-term drug use, family history, concomitant disease, cortisone use, stress factor, high blood pressure, smoking, high cholesterol, heart disease, exercise status, carbohydrate use, alcohol consumption, vegetable use, meat use, age, weight, height, starting age, daily bread consumption, LDL, HDL, Total Cholesterol, Triglyceride, Fasting blood sugar the importance values of independent variables are respectively; 0.017, 0.009, 0.013, 0.017, 0.008, 0.016, 0.008, 0.006, 0.053, 0.024, 0.023, 0.040, 0.007, 0.020, 0.007, 0.046, 0.083, 0.049, 0.024, 0.066, 0.084, 0.083, 0.020, 0.031, 0.244. Conclusion: According to the performance criteria obtained from the three classification models used to predict Type 2 DM; it has been found that the best classification performance belongs to the ANN model. According to the ANN method, the three most important risk factors that may cause Type 2 DM were found to be fasting blood glucose, LDL, and HDL, respectively.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of multivariate statistical methods to detect risk factors for Type 2 diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"ipek ek, Saim Lu, ibrahim ahin\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The goal of this study is to compare the performances of Logistic Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Decision Tree models, which are machine learning classification methods, in the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and to determine the most successful method. It is also the examination of risk factors affecting Type 2 DM using these models. Method: The study's data was collected from patients who visited the Diabetes and Thyroid polyclinic at the Inonu University Faculty of Medicine Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine. The k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm, which is one of the missing value assignment methods, was used to eliminate the problems related to missing values. Sensitivity, accuracy, precision, specificity, AUC F1-score, and classification error were used as performance evaluation criteria. Evolutionary algorithm parameter optimization method was used to optimize the parameters of the ANN model. Missing value assignment, modeling and parameter optimization were done with Rapidminer Studio Free version 8.1. Results: Among the three methods applied in the diagnosis of Type 2 DM, the ANN gave the best classification performance. The accuracy, sensitivity, selectivity, precision, F1-score, AUC and classification error values obtained from this method are respectively; 98.94%, 100%, 97.73%, 98.04%, 99.01%, 0.978 and 1.06. For the ANN method, the importance values of the gender, long-term drug use, family history, concomitant disease, cortisone use, stress factor, high blood pressure, smoking, high cholesterol, heart disease, exercise status, carbohydrate use, alcohol consumption, vegetable use, meat use, age, weight, height, starting age, daily bread consumption, LDL, HDL, Total Cholesterol, Triglyceride, Fasting blood sugar the importance values of independent variables are respectively; 0.017, 0.009, 0.013, 0.017, 0.008, 0.016, 0.008, 0.006, 0.053, 0.024, 0.023, 0.040, 0.007, 0.020, 0.007, 0.046, 0.083, 0.049, 0.024, 0.066, 0.084, 0.083, 0.020, 0.031, 0.244. Conclusion: According to the performance criteria obtained from the three classification models used to predict Type 2 DM; it has been found that the best classification performance belongs to the ANN model. According to the ANN method, the three most important risk factors that may cause Type 2 DM were found to be fasting blood glucose, LDL, and HDL, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较逻辑回归(LR)、人工神经网络(ANN)和决策树模型这三种机器学习分类方法在2型糖尿病(DM)诊断中的性能,并确定最成功的方法。这也是使用这些模型检查影响2型糖尿病的危险因素。方法:本研究的数据收集自伊诺努大学医学院Turgut Ozal医学中心内科糖尿病和甲状腺综合诊所的患者。使用缺失值分配方法之一的k近邻算法来消除缺失值相关问题。灵敏度、准确度、精密度、特异度、AUC f1评分、分类误差作为性能评价标准。采用进化算法参数优化方法对人工神经网络模型的参数进行优化。缺失值赋值、建模和参数优化都是在Rapidminer Studio免费版8.1中完成的。结果:在3种诊断2型糖尿病的方法中,人工神经网络的分类效果最好。该方法得到的准确度、灵敏度、选择性、精密度、f1评分、AUC和分类误差值分别为;98.94%、100%、97.73%、98.04%、99.01%、0.978和1.06。对于人工神经网络方法,性别、长期用药、家族史、合并症、可的松使用、应激因素、高血压、吸烟、高胆固醇、心脏病、运动状况、碳水化合物使用、酒精使用、蔬菜使用、肉类使用、年龄、体重、身高、起始年龄、每日面包消费量、LDL、HDL、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、空腹血糖的重要值分别为;0.017、0.009、0.013、0.017、0.008、0.016、0.008、0.006、0.053、0.024、0.023、0.040、0.007、0.020、0.007、0.046、0.083、0.049、0.024、0.066、0.084、0.083、0.020、0.031、0.244。结论:根据三种分类模型所得的性能标准,可用于预测2型糖尿病;结果表明,人工神经网络模型的分类性能最好。根据ANN方法,发现可能导致2型糖尿病的三个最重要的危险因素分别是空腹血糖、低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of multivariate statistical methods to detect risk factors for Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Aim: The goal of this study is to compare the performances of Logistic Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Decision Tree models, which are machine learning classification methods, in the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and to determine the most successful method. It is also the examination of risk factors affecting Type 2 DM using these models. Method: The study's data was collected from patients who visited the Diabetes and Thyroid polyclinic at the Inonu University Faculty of Medicine Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine. The k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm, which is one of the missing value assignment methods, was used to eliminate the problems related to missing values. Sensitivity, accuracy, precision, specificity, AUC F1-score, and classification error were used as performance evaluation criteria. Evolutionary algorithm parameter optimization method was used to optimize the parameters of the ANN model. Missing value assignment, modeling and parameter optimization were done with Rapidminer Studio Free version 8.1. Results: Among the three methods applied in the diagnosis of Type 2 DM, the ANN gave the best classification performance. The accuracy, sensitivity, selectivity, precision, F1-score, AUC and classification error values obtained from this method are respectively; 98.94%, 100%, 97.73%, 98.04%, 99.01%, 0.978 and 1.06. For the ANN method, the importance values of the gender, long-term drug use, family history, concomitant disease, cortisone use, stress factor, high blood pressure, smoking, high cholesterol, heart disease, exercise status, carbohydrate use, alcohol consumption, vegetable use, meat use, age, weight, height, starting age, daily bread consumption, LDL, HDL, Total Cholesterol, Triglyceride, Fasting blood sugar the importance values of independent variables are respectively; 0.017, 0.009, 0.013, 0.017, 0.008, 0.016, 0.008, 0.006, 0.053, 0.024, 0.023, 0.040, 0.007, 0.020, 0.007, 0.046, 0.083, 0.049, 0.024, 0.066, 0.084, 0.083, 0.020, 0.031, 0.244. Conclusion: According to the performance criteria obtained from the three classification models used to predict Type 2 DM; it has been found that the best classification performance belongs to the ANN model. According to the ANN method, the three most important risk factors that may cause Type 2 DM were found to be fasting blood glucose, LDL, and HDL, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信