我们被卖给了柠檬吗?分析那些工党提议的社会保险计划所涵盖的分配影响

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Michael Fletcher
{"title":"我们被卖给了柠檬吗?分析那些工党提议的社会保险计划所涵盖的分配影响","authors":"Michael Fletcher","doi":"10.26686/pq.v19i2.8237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2023, the Labour government announced that it was shelving its proposed income insurance scheme for now, but indicated that the scheme may be revived if Labour is re-elected in October. The proposal raised many equity and efficiency issues, including the inequities of a two-tier system which favours workers who would be covered by the scheme ahead of others who would not. This article focuses on differences in outcomes within the insured group. Using a family vignette methodology, it finds that the scheme, layered on top of existing welfare provisions, would have been highly regressive and poor value for money for many low- and middle-income families.","PeriodicalId":43642,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Were We Being Sold a Lemon? Analysing the distributional implications for those Labour’s proposed social insurance scheme would have covered\",\"authors\":\"Michael Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/pq.v19i2.8237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In February 2023, the Labour government announced that it was shelving its proposed income insurance scheme for now, but indicated that the scheme may be revived if Labour is re-elected in October. The proposal raised many equity and efficiency issues, including the inequities of a two-tier system which favours workers who would be covered by the scheme ahead of others who would not. This article focuses on differences in outcomes within the insured group. Using a family vignette methodology, it finds that the scheme, layered on top of existing welfare provisions, would have been highly regressive and poor value for money for many low- and middle-income families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Policy Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Policy Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v19i2.8237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v19i2.8237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年2月,工党政府宣布暂时搁置其拟议的收入保险计划,但表示如果工党在10月再次当选,该计划可能会恢复。该提案提出了许多公平和效率问题,包括两级制度的不公平,该制度有利于那些将被该计划覆盖的工人,而不是那些不被覆盖的工人。本文关注的是参保群体内部结果的差异。使用家庭小插图方法,它发现该计划,在现有的福利规定之上分层,对许多低收入和中等收入家庭来说,将是高度累退的,而且物有所值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Were We Being Sold a Lemon? Analysing the distributional implications for those Labour’s proposed social insurance scheme would have covered
In February 2023, the Labour government announced that it was shelving its proposed income insurance scheme for now, but indicated that the scheme may be revived if Labour is re-elected in October. The proposal raised many equity and efficiency issues, including the inequities of a two-tier system which favours workers who would be covered by the scheme ahead of others who would not. This article focuses on differences in outcomes within the insured group. Using a family vignette methodology, it finds that the scheme, layered on top of existing welfare provisions, would have been highly regressive and poor value for money for many low- and middle-income families.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Policy Quarterly
Turkish Policy Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信