1996 - 2015年巴西性别工资歧视:匹配分析

Thiago Morello , Jacqueline Anjolim
{"title":"1996 - 2015年巴西性别工资歧视:匹配分析","authors":"Thiago Morello ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Anjolim","doi":"10.1016/j.econ.2021.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The discriminatory component of the gender wage gap was found to be significant and to decrease over time by previous studies, most of them based on the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition (OBD). Such evidence is disputable for being grounded on the assumption of full common support between men and women, which has been increasingly refuted by international literature. Seeking to fill this gap for the case of Brazil, the paper revisits household survey data from 1996 to 2015 with propensity score (PS) and nearest-neighbour (NN) matching techniques. As results, the discriminatory component was confirmed to be significant in all years and not to follow a systematic decaying trend across the years – the fall observed from 1996 to 2004 was offset in 65% by a subsequent increase. Gender discrimination was heterogeneous throughout occupational categories, being especially high in management positions. Estimates, albeit belonging to the range of previous studies, also challenged the gap closing trend suggested by these studies. Given ongoing recession and high informality, it is uncertain whether further progress towards gender wage equality in Brazil will emerge spontaneously from the private sector or whether specific policy is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100389,"journal":{"name":"EconomiA","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 114-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.econ.2021.03.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender wage discrimination in Brazil from 1996 to 2015: A matching analysis\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Morello ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Anjolim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econ.2021.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The discriminatory component of the gender wage gap was found to be significant and to decrease over time by previous studies, most of them based on the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition (OBD). Such evidence is disputable for being grounded on the assumption of full common support between men and women, which has been increasingly refuted by international literature. Seeking to fill this gap for the case of Brazil, the paper revisits household survey data from 1996 to 2015 with propensity score (PS) and nearest-neighbour (NN) matching techniques. As results, the discriminatory component was confirmed to be significant in all years and not to follow a systematic decaying trend across the years – the fall observed from 1996 to 2004 was offset in 65% by a subsequent increase. Gender discrimination was heterogeneous throughout occupational categories, being especially high in management positions. Estimates, albeit belonging to the range of previous studies, also challenged the gap closing trend suggested by these studies. Given ongoing recession and high informality, it is uncertain whether further progress towards gender wage equality in Brazil will emerge spontaneously from the private sector or whether specific policy is needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EconomiA\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 114-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.econ.2021.03.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EconomiA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EconomiA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

以前的研究发现,性别工资差距的歧视性成分是显著的,并且随着时间的推移而减少,这些研究大多基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解(OBD)。这种证据是有争议的,因为它是建立在男女之间完全共同支持的假设基础上的,而这一假设已日益受到国际文献的驳斥。为了填补巴西的这一空白,本文使用倾向得分(PS)和最近邻(NN)匹配技术重新审视了1996年至2015年的家庭调查数据。结果证实,歧视性成分在所有年份都很重要,并没有遵循历年的系统性衰减趋势——1996年至2004年观测到的下降被随后的增加65%抵消。性别歧视在各种职业类别中各不相同,在管理职位中尤其严重。估计数虽然属于以前研究的范围,但也对这些研究提出的差距缩小趋势提出了挑战。鉴于持续的经济衰退和高度的非正式性,不确定巴西在实现两性工资平等方面是否会自发地从私营部门取得进一步进展,或者是否需要具体的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender wage discrimination in Brazil from 1996 to 2015: A matching analysis

The discriminatory component of the gender wage gap was found to be significant and to decrease over time by previous studies, most of them based on the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition (OBD). Such evidence is disputable for being grounded on the assumption of full common support between men and women, which has been increasingly refuted by international literature. Seeking to fill this gap for the case of Brazil, the paper revisits household survey data from 1996 to 2015 with propensity score (PS) and nearest-neighbour (NN) matching techniques. As results, the discriminatory component was confirmed to be significant in all years and not to follow a systematic decaying trend across the years – the fall observed from 1996 to 2004 was offset in 65% by a subsequent increase. Gender discrimination was heterogeneous throughout occupational categories, being especially high in management positions. Estimates, albeit belonging to the range of previous studies, also challenged the gap closing trend suggested by these studies. Given ongoing recession and high informality, it is uncertain whether further progress towards gender wage equality in Brazil will emerge spontaneously from the private sector or whether specific policy is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信