秋粘虫对微生物和植物性生物杀虫剂的敏感性及防治失败可能性估计

B.R. Ahissou, W.M. Sawadogo, G. Dabiré, F. Kambiré, A. Bokonon-ganta, I. Somda, F. Verheggen
{"title":"秋粘虫对微生物和植物性生物杀虫剂的敏感性及防治失败可能性估计","authors":"B.R. Ahissou, W.M. Sawadogo, G. Dabiré, F. Kambiré, A. Bokonon-ganta, I. Somda, F. Verheggen","doi":"10.25518/1780-4507.19793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Description of the subject. The fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) has become one of the most devastating pests of maize and other important economic crops in Africa since 2016. Among the alternatives to chemical insecticides, bioinsecticides are an interesting option that needs to be explored. Objectives. The susceptibility of fall armyworm to seven bioinsecticides available on the West African market was evaluated in Burkina Faso. Method. Bioassays were conducted following the approved IRAC 020 protocol. Results. Spinetoram (LC80 = 85.3 µg·l-1) and spinosad (LC80 = 437.9 µg·l-1) were the most toxic at concentrations below those recommended by the manufacturer, and had control failure likelihoods close to 0%. Bacillus thuringiensis and products based on Azadirachta indica and Carapa procera extracts were less effective (at the manufacturers' recommended doses), even though they showed significant levels of toxicity on young instars. Conclusions. A list of effective bioinsecticides should be communicated for sustainable management of fall armyworm in West Africa.","PeriodicalId":87455,"journal":{"name":"Skull base surgery","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) to microbial and botanical bioinsecticides and control failure likelihood estimation\",\"authors\":\"B.R. Ahissou, W.M. Sawadogo, G. Dabiré, F. Kambiré, A. Bokonon-ganta, I. Somda, F. Verheggen\",\"doi\":\"10.25518/1780-4507.19793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Description of the subject. The fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) has become one of the most devastating pests of maize and other important economic crops in Africa since 2016. Among the alternatives to chemical insecticides, bioinsecticides are an interesting option that needs to be explored. Objectives. The susceptibility of fall armyworm to seven bioinsecticides available on the West African market was evaluated in Burkina Faso. Method. Bioassays were conducted following the approved IRAC 020 protocol. Results. Spinetoram (LC80 = 85.3 µg·l-1) and spinosad (LC80 = 437.9 µg·l-1) were the most toxic at concentrations below those recommended by the manufacturer, and had control failure likelihoods close to 0%. Bacillus thuringiensis and products based on Azadirachta indica and Carapa procera extracts were less effective (at the manufacturers' recommended doses), even though they showed significant levels of toxicity on young instars. Conclusions. A list of effective bioinsecticides should be communicated for sustainable management of fall armyworm in West Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skull base surgery\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skull base surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.19793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull base surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.19793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

主题描述。自2016年以来,秋粘虫Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith)已成为非洲玉米和其他重要经济作物最具破坏性的害虫之一。在化学杀虫剂的替代品中,生物杀虫剂是一个值得探索的有趣选择。目标。在布基纳法索评估了秋粘虫对西非市场上七种生物杀虫剂的敏感性。方法。生物测定按照批准的IRAC 020方案进行。结果。Spinetoram (LC80 = 85.3µg·l-1)和spinosad (LC80 = 437.9µg·l-1)浓度低于制造商推荐浓度时毒性最大,控制失效概率接近0%。苏云金芽孢杆菌和基于印楝和银果提取物的产品效果较差(在制造商推荐的剂量下),尽管它们对幼虫显示出显著的毒性。结论。应通报一份有效生物杀虫剂清单,以促进西非秋粘虫的可持续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Susceptibility of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) to microbial and botanical bioinsecticides and control failure likelihood estimation
Description of the subject. The fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) has become one of the most devastating pests of maize and other important economic crops in Africa since 2016. Among the alternatives to chemical insecticides, bioinsecticides are an interesting option that needs to be explored. Objectives. The susceptibility of fall armyworm to seven bioinsecticides available on the West African market was evaluated in Burkina Faso. Method. Bioassays were conducted following the approved IRAC 020 protocol. Results. Spinetoram (LC80 = 85.3 µg·l-1) and spinosad (LC80 = 437.9 µg·l-1) were the most toxic at concentrations below those recommended by the manufacturer, and had control failure likelihoods close to 0%. Bacillus thuringiensis and products based on Azadirachta indica and Carapa procera extracts were less effective (at the manufacturers' recommended doses), even though they showed significant levels of toxicity on young instars. Conclusions. A list of effective bioinsecticides should be communicated for sustainable management of fall armyworm in West Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信