{"title":"补充支出贫困测度:一种衡量贫困的新方法","authors":"John M. Fitzgerald, R. Moffitt","doi":"10.1353/eca.2022.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:We propose a new measure of the rate of poverty we call the supplemental expenditure poverty measure (SEPM), based on expenditure in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. It treats household expenditure as a measure of resources available to purchase the minimum bundle necessary to meet basic needs. Our measure differs from conventional income and consumption poverty in both concept and measurement, and it has advantages relative to both. Poverty rates using our basic measure are very close in level and recent trend to those of the most preferred income-based poverty rate produced by the US Census Bureau. But the SEPM poverty rate differs from the US Census Bureau measure at different levels of the poverty line. For example, the number of individuals living in either poor or almost poor households is 5 percentage points greater (about 16 million individuals) using our measure. We also construct an augmented measure that adds additional potential liquid resources. This \"maximal resources\" measure indicates that if disadvantaged households used up all their bank balances and maximized their credit card borrowing, 9.6 percent of the population (over 31 million individuals) would still be poor and unable to purchase the goods necessary for the basic needs of life.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Supplemental Expenditure Poverty Measure: A New Method for Measuring Poverty\",\"authors\":\"John M. Fitzgerald, R. Moffitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/eca.2022.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:We propose a new measure of the rate of poverty we call the supplemental expenditure poverty measure (SEPM), based on expenditure in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. It treats household expenditure as a measure of resources available to purchase the minimum bundle necessary to meet basic needs. Our measure differs from conventional income and consumption poverty in both concept and measurement, and it has advantages relative to both. Poverty rates using our basic measure are very close in level and recent trend to those of the most preferred income-based poverty rate produced by the US Census Bureau. But the SEPM poverty rate differs from the US Census Bureau measure at different levels of the poverty line. For example, the number of individuals living in either poor or almost poor households is 5 percentage points greater (about 16 million individuals) using our measure. We also construct an augmented measure that adds additional potential liquid resources. This \\\"maximal resources\\\" measure indicates that if disadvantaged households used up all their bank balances and maximized their credit card borrowing, 9.6 percent of the population (over 31 million individuals) would still be poor and unable to purchase the goods necessary for the basic needs of life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2022.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2022.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
摘要:本文基于消费者支出调查中的支出,提出了一种新的贫困率度量方法——补充支出贫困度量(SEPM)。它将家庭支出视为衡量可用于购买满足基本需要的最低限度必需品的资源。本文的计量方法在概念和计量方法上都与传统的收入贫困和消费性贫困有所不同,并具有相对于两者的优势。根据我们的基本衡量标准,贫困率在水平和近期趋势上与美国人口普查局(US Census Bureau)最优选的基于收入的贫困率非常接近。但SEPM的贫困率与美国人口普查局在不同贫困线水平上的测量结果不同。例如,使用我们的衡量标准,生活在贫困或近乎贫困家庭中的个人数量高出5个百分点(约1600万人)。我们还构建了一个增强措施,增加了额外的潜在液体资源。这一“最大资源”指标表明,如果弱势家庭用尽了他们所有的银行余额,并将信用卡借款最大化,9.6%的人口(超过3100万人)仍将处于贫困状态,无法购买基本生活所需的物品。
The Supplemental Expenditure Poverty Measure: A New Method for Measuring Poverty
ABSTRACT:We propose a new measure of the rate of poverty we call the supplemental expenditure poverty measure (SEPM), based on expenditure in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. It treats household expenditure as a measure of resources available to purchase the minimum bundle necessary to meet basic needs. Our measure differs from conventional income and consumption poverty in both concept and measurement, and it has advantages relative to both. Poverty rates using our basic measure are very close in level and recent trend to those of the most preferred income-based poverty rate produced by the US Census Bureau. But the SEPM poverty rate differs from the US Census Bureau measure at different levels of the poverty line. For example, the number of individuals living in either poor or almost poor households is 5 percentage points greater (about 16 million individuals) using our measure. We also construct an augmented measure that adds additional potential liquid resources. This "maximal resources" measure indicates that if disadvantaged households used up all their bank balances and maximized their credit card borrowing, 9.6 percent of the population (over 31 million individuals) would still be poor and unable to purchase the goods necessary for the basic needs of life.