M. Şahin, B. I. Aydoğan, E. Özkan, R. Emral, S. Güllü, M. Erdoğan, D. Çorapçıoğlu
{"title":"分化型甲状腺癌随访中重组人促甲状腺激素与甲状腺激素停药:单中心经验。","authors":"M. Şahin, B. I. Aydoğan, E. Özkan, R. Emral, S. Güllü, M. Erdoğan, D. Çorapçıoğlu","doi":"10.4183/aeb.2021.337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Our goal was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) methods in detecting recurrence/persistence (R/PD) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods The study included 413 patients with DTC who underwent total thyroidectomy and had remnant ablation. DxWBS, s-Tg levels, R/PD were evaluated retrospectively. A s-Tg level≥2 ng/mL was considered as \"positive s-Tg\". Results DxWBS and s-Tg levels were evaluated with rhTSH in 116 and THW in 297 subjects, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \"positive s-Tg\" for R/PD in THW group were 77.3% and 92.7%, with 90.3% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \"positive s-Tg\" for R/PD in rhTSH group were 58.8% and 100% with 93.9 % accuracy, respectively. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 17.1%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 89.4% accuracy in THW group. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 88.8% accuracy in rhTSH group. Conclusion Method of TSH stimulation did not influence the reliability of DxWBS. The \"positive s-Tg level\" had a higher sensitivity with THW when compared to rhTSH in detecting R/PD.","PeriodicalId":6910,"journal":{"name":"Acta endocrinologica","volume":"11 1","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma follow-up: a single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"M. Şahin, B. I. Aydoğan, E. Özkan, R. Emral, S. Güllü, M. Erdoğan, D. Çorapçıoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.4183/aeb.2021.337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Our goal was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) methods in detecting recurrence/persistence (R/PD) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods The study included 413 patients with DTC who underwent total thyroidectomy and had remnant ablation. DxWBS, s-Tg levels, R/PD were evaluated retrospectively. A s-Tg level≥2 ng/mL was considered as \\\"positive s-Tg\\\". Results DxWBS and s-Tg levels were evaluated with rhTSH in 116 and THW in 297 subjects, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \\\"positive s-Tg\\\" for R/PD in THW group were 77.3% and 92.7%, with 90.3% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \\\"positive s-Tg\\\" for R/PD in rhTSH group were 58.8% and 100% with 93.9 % accuracy, respectively. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 17.1%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 89.4% accuracy in THW group. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 88.8% accuracy in rhTSH group. Conclusion Method of TSH stimulation did not influence the reliability of DxWBS. The \\\"positive s-Tg level\\\" had a higher sensitivity with THW when compared to rhTSH in detecting R/PD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta endocrinologica\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"337-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta endocrinologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2021.337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta endocrinologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2021.337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma follow-up: a single center experience.
Introduction Our goal was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) methods in detecting recurrence/persistence (R/PD) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods The study included 413 patients with DTC who underwent total thyroidectomy and had remnant ablation. DxWBS, s-Tg levels, R/PD were evaluated retrospectively. A s-Tg level≥2 ng/mL was considered as "positive s-Tg". Results DxWBS and s-Tg levels were evaluated with rhTSH in 116 and THW in 297 subjects, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of "positive s-Tg" for R/PD in THW group were 77.3% and 92.7%, with 90.3% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of "positive s-Tg" for R/PD in rhTSH group were 58.8% and 100% with 93.9 % accuracy, respectively. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 17.1%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 89.4% accuracy in THW group. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 88.8% accuracy in rhTSH group. Conclusion Method of TSH stimulation did not influence the reliability of DxWBS. The "positive s-Tg level" had a higher sensitivity with THW when compared to rhTSH in detecting R/PD.