分化型甲状腺癌随访中重组人促甲状腺激素与甲状腺激素停药:单中心经验。

M. Şahin, B. I. Aydoğan, E. Özkan, R. Emral, S. Güllü, M. Erdoğan, D. Çorapçıoğlu
{"title":"分化型甲状腺癌随访中重组人促甲状腺激素与甲状腺激素停药:单中心经验。","authors":"M. Şahin, B. I. Aydoğan, E. Özkan, R. Emral, S. Güllü, M. Erdoğan, D. Çorapçıoğlu","doi":"10.4183/aeb.2021.337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Our goal was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) methods in detecting recurrence/persistence (R/PD) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods The study included 413 patients with DTC who underwent total thyroidectomy and had remnant ablation. DxWBS, s-Tg levels, R/PD were evaluated retrospectively. A s-Tg level≥2 ng/mL was considered as \"positive s-Tg\". Results DxWBS and s-Tg levels were evaluated with rhTSH in 116 and THW in 297 subjects, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \"positive s-Tg\" for R/PD in THW group were 77.3% and 92.7%, with 90.3% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \"positive s-Tg\" for R/PD in rhTSH group were 58.8% and 100% with 93.9 % accuracy, respectively. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 17.1%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 89.4% accuracy in THW group. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 88.8% accuracy in rhTSH group. Conclusion Method of TSH stimulation did not influence the reliability of DxWBS. The \"positive s-Tg level\" had a higher sensitivity with THW when compared to rhTSH in detecting R/PD.","PeriodicalId":6910,"journal":{"name":"Acta endocrinologica","volume":"11 1","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma follow-up: a single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"M. Şahin, B. I. Aydoğan, E. Özkan, R. Emral, S. Güllü, M. Erdoğan, D. Çorapçıoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.4183/aeb.2021.337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Our goal was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) methods in detecting recurrence/persistence (R/PD) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods The study included 413 patients with DTC who underwent total thyroidectomy and had remnant ablation. DxWBS, s-Tg levels, R/PD were evaluated retrospectively. A s-Tg level≥2 ng/mL was considered as \\\"positive s-Tg\\\". Results DxWBS and s-Tg levels were evaluated with rhTSH in 116 and THW in 297 subjects, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \\\"positive s-Tg\\\" for R/PD in THW group were 77.3% and 92.7%, with 90.3% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of \\\"positive s-Tg\\\" for R/PD in rhTSH group were 58.8% and 100% with 93.9 % accuracy, respectively. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 17.1%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 89.4% accuracy in THW group. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 88.8% accuracy in rhTSH group. Conclusion Method of TSH stimulation did not influence the reliability of DxWBS. The \\\"positive s-Tg level\\\" had a higher sensitivity with THW when compared to rhTSH in detecting R/PD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta endocrinologica\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"337-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta endocrinologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2021.337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta endocrinologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2021.337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是评估和比较甲状腺激素停用(THW)和重组促甲状腺激素(rhTSH)方法在检测分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)复发/持续(R/PD)诊断中的应用价值。方法对413例行甲状腺全切除术和残余消融的DTC患者进行研究。回顾性评价DxWBS、s-Tg水平、R/PD。s-Tg≥2 ng/mL为s-Tg阳性。结果用rhTSH测定116例患者dxwbs和297例患者THW的s-Tg水平。THW组R/PD“s-Tg阳性”的敏感性和特异性分别为77.3%和92.7%,准确率为90.3%。rhTSH组R/PD“s-Tg阳性”的敏感性为58.8%,特异性为100%,准确率为93.9%。WBS时甲状腺床外摄取的敏感性为17.1%,THW组R/PD的特异性为100%,准确率为89.4%。WBS时甲状腺床外摄取的敏感性为7.7%,rhTSH组R/PD的特异性为100%,准确率为88.8%。结论刺激TSH的方法不影响DxWBS的可靠性。与rhTSH相比,“阳性s-Tg水平”对THW检测R/PD的敏感性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma follow-up: a single center experience.
Introduction Our goal was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) methods in detecting recurrence/persistence (R/PD) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods The study included 413 patients with DTC who underwent total thyroidectomy and had remnant ablation. DxWBS, s-Tg levels, R/PD were evaluated retrospectively. A s-Tg level≥2 ng/mL was considered as "positive s-Tg". Results DxWBS and s-Tg levels were evaluated with rhTSH in 116 and THW in 297 subjects, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of "positive s-Tg" for R/PD in THW group were 77.3% and 92.7%, with 90.3% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of "positive s-Tg" for R/PD in rhTSH group were 58.8% and 100% with 93.9 % accuracy, respectively. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 17.1%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 89.4% accuracy in THW group. An uptake outside thyroid bed at WBS showed a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 100% for R/PD with 88.8% accuracy in rhTSH group. Conclusion Method of TSH stimulation did not influence the reliability of DxWBS. The "positive s-Tg level" had a higher sensitivity with THW when compared to rhTSH in detecting R/PD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信