临床会议中的专家主张:分析医学术语的关系作用

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Lazzaro-Salazar
{"title":"临床会议中的专家主张:分析医学术语的关系作用","authors":"M. Lazzaro-Salazar","doi":"10.15443/rl3203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how a group of clinicians discursively constructs their expert stances using medical jargon as they discuss their professional practices and patients’ cases at a clinic. Guided by the discursive analytic tradition of interactional sociolinguistics, the analysis is based on naturally-occurring conversations that have been audio and video recorded during four clinical meetings in a healthcare setting in New Zealand. This paper shows that the use of medical jargon plays a vital role in constructing expert stances that address the interactional, and especially relational, needs of participants in these clinical meetings. In particular, the paper discusses the role of medical jargon in the construction of clinicians’ expert stances when building ingroup alignments, managing professional criticism and managing disagreement in peer-peer interactions. Concluding remarks offer reflections on the role of medical jargon in the construction of clinicians’ relational stance and the need to further investigate the use of specialised jargon in other contexts of peer communication.","PeriodicalId":40963,"journal":{"name":"Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Claims in Clinical Meetings: Analysing the Relational Role of Medical Jargon\",\"authors\":\"M. Lazzaro-Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.15443/rl3203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores how a group of clinicians discursively constructs their expert stances using medical jargon as they discuss their professional practices and patients’ cases at a clinic. Guided by the discursive analytic tradition of interactional sociolinguistics, the analysis is based on naturally-occurring conversations that have been audio and video recorded during four clinical meetings in a healthcare setting in New Zealand. This paper shows that the use of medical jargon plays a vital role in constructing expert stances that address the interactional, and especially relational, needs of participants in these clinical meetings. In particular, the paper discusses the role of medical jargon in the construction of clinicians’ expert stances when building ingroup alignments, managing professional criticism and managing disagreement in peer-peer interactions. Concluding remarks offer reflections on the role of medical jargon in the construction of clinicians’ relational stance and the need to further investigate the use of specialised jargon in other contexts of peer communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15443/rl3203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15443/rl3203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了如何一组临床医生话语构建他们的专家立场使用医学术语,因为他们讨论他们的专业实践和病人的情况下,在诊所。在互动社会语言学的话语分析传统的指导下,分析是基于自然发生的对话,这些对话是在新西兰医疗保健设置的四次临床会议期间录制的音频和视频。本文表明,医学术语的使用在构建专家立场方面起着至关重要的作用,这些专家立场解决了这些临床会议参与者的互动,特别是关系需求。特别地,本文讨论了医学术语在建立小组内联盟、管理专业批评和管理对等互动中的分歧时,在临床医生专家立场建设中的作用。结束语反思了医学术语在构建临床医生关系立场中的作用,以及进一步调查专业术语在同行交流其他背景下使用的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Claims in Clinical Meetings: Analysing the Relational Role of Medical Jargon
This paper explores how a group of clinicians discursively constructs their expert stances using medical jargon as they discuss their professional practices and patients’ cases at a clinic. Guided by the discursive analytic tradition of interactional sociolinguistics, the analysis is based on naturally-occurring conversations that have been audio and video recorded during four clinical meetings in a healthcare setting in New Zealand. This paper shows that the use of medical jargon plays a vital role in constructing expert stances that address the interactional, and especially relational, needs of participants in these clinical meetings. In particular, the paper discusses the role of medical jargon in the construction of clinicians’ expert stances when building ingroup alignments, managing professional criticism and managing disagreement in peer-peer interactions. Concluding remarks offer reflections on the role of medical jargon in the construction of clinicians’ relational stance and the need to further investigate the use of specialised jargon in other contexts of peer communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信