论俄国现代散文中英雄行为评价的独创性问题(以皮耶图克的《我与改革》和余的故事为例)。Koval“茶壶”)

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Khadija Yusifova
{"title":"论俄国现代散文中英雄行为评价的独创性问题(以皮耶图克的《我与改革》和余的故事为例)。Koval“茶壶”)","authors":"Khadija Yusifova","doi":"10.20339/phs.4-23.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of two stories that have not been the subject of a special scientific study until now, the essence of non-traditional Russian prose is revealed. The article focuses all attention on such a trend that has spun off from this literature as the “ironic avant-garde”. In the 21st century, it becomes a panacea for the work of many Russian word artists, whose names are given in the work. The essence of this trend in the presented article is that, in general and in general, the realistic picture of the facts and events described by the author is invariably presented in a mockingly ironic light. The two compared stories parody the slogan of the general happiness of people, provided by the authorities of society with the help of the ideology of social equality, fraternity and even redistribution of material wealth among them. In reality, in the story of V. Pietsukh, the institution of the family, love and marriage is debunked (the key phrase from the lips of the hero sounds like this: “we are going through a period of an antediluvian form of family and marriage”); Y. Koval’s dream of a talented artist to break out into the people, but living below the poverty line, is being thrown off the pedestal (almost according to Dostoevsky). In both stories, thus, the difficult, or rather, hopeless life of a balabol and hard worker with collapsed hopes for the improvement of society is shown.","PeriodicalId":40803,"journal":{"name":"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the question of the originality of assessments of the behavior of heroes in modern Russian prose (based on the stories of V. Pietsukh “I and Perestroika” and Yu. Koval “Teapot”)\",\"authors\":\"Khadija Yusifova\",\"doi\":\"10.20339/phs.4-23.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the basis of two stories that have not been the subject of a special scientific study until now, the essence of non-traditional Russian prose is revealed. The article focuses all attention on such a trend that has spun off from this literature as the “ironic avant-garde”. In the 21st century, it becomes a panacea for the work of many Russian word artists, whose names are given in the work. The essence of this trend in the presented article is that, in general and in general, the realistic picture of the facts and events described by the author is invariably presented in a mockingly ironic light. The two compared stories parody the slogan of the general happiness of people, provided by the authorities of society with the help of the ideology of social equality, fraternity and even redistribution of material wealth among them. In reality, in the story of V. Pietsukh, the institution of the family, love and marriage is debunked (the key phrase from the lips of the hero sounds like this: “we are going through a period of an antediluvian form of family and marriage”); Y. Koval’s dream of a talented artist to break out into the people, but living below the poverty line, is being thrown off the pedestal (almost according to Dostoevsky). In both stories, thus, the difficult, or rather, hopeless life of a balabol and hard worker with collapsed hopes for the improvement of society is shown.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20339/phs.4-23.116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20339/phs.4-23.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以两个至今尚未被专门科学研究的故事为基础,揭示了非传统俄罗斯散文的本质。这篇文章把所有的注意力都集中在从这种文学中分离出来的一种趋势上,即“讽刺先锋”。在21世纪,它成为许多俄罗斯文字艺术家的灵丹妙药,他们的名字都在作品中。这篇文章所呈现的趋势的本质是,总的来说,作者所描述的事实和事件的现实图景总是以一种嘲弄的讽刺的方式呈现。这两个比较的故事模仿了社会当局在社会平等、博爱甚至物质财富再分配的意识形态的帮助下提供的人民普遍幸福的口号。实际上,在V. Pietsukh的故事中,家庭、爱情和婚姻的制度是被揭穿的(从主人公嘴里说出的关键短语听起来是这样的:“我们正在经历一个家庭和婚姻形式过时的时期”);Y.科瓦尔的梦想,一个才华横溢的艺术家突破人民,但生活在贫困线以下,是被抛弃的基座(几乎根据陀思妥耶夫斯基)。因此,在这两个故事中,都表现了一个戴头巾、努力工作的人的艰难生活,或者更确切地说,是无望的生活,他对改善社会的希望破灭了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the question of the originality of assessments of the behavior of heroes in modern Russian prose (based on the stories of V. Pietsukh “I and Perestroika” and Yu. Koval “Teapot”)
On the basis of two stories that have not been the subject of a special scientific study until now, the essence of non-traditional Russian prose is revealed. The article focuses all attention on such a trend that has spun off from this literature as the “ironic avant-garde”. In the 21st century, it becomes a panacea for the work of many Russian word artists, whose names are given in the work. The essence of this trend in the presented article is that, in general and in general, the realistic picture of the facts and events described by the author is invariably presented in a mockingly ironic light. The two compared stories parody the slogan of the general happiness of people, provided by the authorities of society with the help of the ideology of social equality, fraternity and even redistribution of material wealth among them. In reality, in the story of V. Pietsukh, the institution of the family, love and marriage is debunked (the key phrase from the lips of the hero sounds like this: “we are going through a period of an antediluvian form of family and marriage”); Y. Koval’s dream of a talented artist to break out into the people, but living below the poverty line, is being thrown off the pedestal (almost according to Dostoevsky). In both stories, thus, the difficult, or rather, hopeless life of a balabol and hard worker with collapsed hopes for the improvement of society is shown.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信