基于纽曼解题程序的学生错误分析——从认知风格FI和FD看

Ni Kadek Indri, Wira Pratiwi, K. A. Wibawa
{"title":"基于纽曼解题程序的学生错误分析——从认知风格FI和FD看","authors":"Ni Kadek Indri, Wira Pratiwi, K. A. Wibawa","doi":"10.31000/prima.v7i1.6761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the types of errors and the causes of errors made by students in solving HOTS type questions for SPLTV material based on Newman's procedure in terms of the cognitive style of class X students of Senior High School number six Denpasar. The method of this research is a qualitative method. The data was collected by means of the HOTS test, GEFT, interviews, and documentation. The subjects of this study were students of class X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 6 Denpasar which were then grouped based on cognitive styles, namely Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD) students and the number of errors in each cognitive style in answering HOTS questions was categorized into 3, namely errors quite complex, complex, and very complex. The average percentage of FI student errors is 38.88%. The average percentage of FD students' errors is 55.55%. The errors of students with cognitive style FD are more than students with cognitive style FI. The causes of errors in the subject of FI are (1) less calm in working on questions, (2) lack of knowledge of the steps that must be taken to solve problems, (3) lack of time in solving problems. completion process, and (4) no re-checking of written answers. The causes of FD student errors are (1) incomplete in reading the questions, (2) in a hurry to finish quickly, (3) not knowing what is known in the questions implicitly, and (4) not checking again.","PeriodicalId":33718,"journal":{"name":"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERROR BASED ON NEWMAN'S PROCEDURE IN SOLVING HOTS TYPES REVIEWING FROM COGNITIVE STYLE FI and FD\",\"authors\":\"Ni Kadek Indri, Wira Pratiwi, K. A. Wibawa\",\"doi\":\"10.31000/prima.v7i1.6761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to determine the types of errors and the causes of errors made by students in solving HOTS type questions for SPLTV material based on Newman's procedure in terms of the cognitive style of class X students of Senior High School number six Denpasar. The method of this research is a qualitative method. The data was collected by means of the HOTS test, GEFT, interviews, and documentation. The subjects of this study were students of class X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 6 Denpasar which were then grouped based on cognitive styles, namely Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD) students and the number of errors in each cognitive style in answering HOTS questions was categorized into 3, namely errors quite complex, complex, and very complex. The average percentage of FI student errors is 38.88%. The average percentage of FD students' errors is 55.55%. The errors of students with cognitive style FD are more than students with cognitive style FI. The causes of errors in the subject of FI are (1) less calm in working on questions, (2) lack of knowledge of the steps that must be taken to solve problems, (3) lack of time in solving problems. completion process, and (4) no re-checking of written answers. The causes of FD student errors are (1) incomplete in reading the questions, (2) in a hurry to finish quickly, (3) not knowing what is known in the questions implicitly, and (4) not checking again.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i1.6761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i1.6761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在以登巴萨六中学X班学生的认知风格为研究对象,以纽曼程序为基础,确定学生在解决SPLTV材料HOTS类型问题时的错误类型及其产生的错误原因。本研究采用定性方法。数据通过HOTS测试、GEFT、访谈和文献收集。本研究以IPA 1 SMA Negeri 6 Denpasar X班学生为研究对象,根据认知风格分为场独立(FI)和场依赖(FD)学生,并将每种认知风格在回答HOTS问题时的错误数量分为3类,即相当复杂、复杂和非常复杂的错误。FI学生的平均错误率为38.88%。FD学生的平均错误率为55.55%。认知风格FD型学生的错误多于认知风格FI型学生。FI科目中出现错误的原因有:(1)在做题时不够冷静,(2)对解决问题必须采取的步骤缺乏了解,(3)解决问题的时间不够。(四)书面答案不得复核。FD学生错误的原因是:(1)阅读问题不完整,(2)急于快速完成,(3)不知道问题中隐含的已知内容,(4)没有再次检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERROR BASED ON NEWMAN'S PROCEDURE IN SOLVING HOTS TYPES REVIEWING FROM COGNITIVE STYLE FI and FD
The purpose of this study was to determine the types of errors and the causes of errors made by students in solving HOTS type questions for SPLTV material based on Newman's procedure in terms of the cognitive style of class X students of Senior High School number six Denpasar. The method of this research is a qualitative method. The data was collected by means of the HOTS test, GEFT, interviews, and documentation. The subjects of this study were students of class X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 6 Denpasar which were then grouped based on cognitive styles, namely Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD) students and the number of errors in each cognitive style in answering HOTS questions was categorized into 3, namely errors quite complex, complex, and very complex. The average percentage of FI student errors is 38.88%. The average percentage of FD students' errors is 55.55%. The errors of students with cognitive style FD are more than students with cognitive style FI. The causes of errors in the subject of FI are (1) less calm in working on questions, (2) lack of knowledge of the steps that must be taken to solve problems, (3) lack of time in solving problems. completion process, and (4) no re-checking of written answers. The causes of FD student errors are (1) incomplete in reading the questions, (2) in a hurry to finish quickly, (3) not knowing what is known in the questions implicitly, and (4) not checking again.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信