献血者三种乙型肝炎病毒检测方案的评价

R. P. Akpan, V. Azuh, S. Alkhalil, D. Ugbomoiko, Anslem Ajugwo
{"title":"献血者三种乙型肝炎病毒检测方案的评价","authors":"R. P. Akpan, V. Azuh, S. Alkhalil, D. Ugbomoiko, Anslem Ajugwo","doi":"10.4314/jopat.v22i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA diagnosis plays a critical role in the transmission of HBV infections. Accurate protocols in HBV detection will reduce the spread of the virus from blood donors. Therefore, this research compared the HBV detecting potentials of three different HBV protocols in the virus detection. Blood from 200 donors at the University college blood bank Ibadan were sampled and tested for HBV using the ABON™ HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Tests (strip test), Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (ELISA test) and Huruian biology HBV detection kit (qPCR test). HBV positive samples were genotyped by sequencing to ascertain genotype identity. Results showed that of the 200 samples tested, both ABON™ HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Tests and Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (for ELISA) did not record any positive sample. However, Huruian biology HBV detection kit via qPCR recorded a total of twenty-three positive samples. Of the twenty-three samples, twenty were of genotype E while three were of genotype B. The results from this study showed that that qPCR is more accurate in HBV virus detection than ELISA technique and also HBV genotype E is the most common genotype isolated in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":7592,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three hepatitis b virus detection protocols in blood donors\",\"authors\":\"R. P. Akpan, V. Azuh, S. Alkhalil, D. Ugbomoiko, Anslem Ajugwo\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/jopat.v22i1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA diagnosis plays a critical role in the transmission of HBV infections. Accurate protocols in HBV detection will reduce the spread of the virus from blood donors. Therefore, this research compared the HBV detecting potentials of three different HBV protocols in the virus detection. Blood from 200 donors at the University college blood bank Ibadan were sampled and tested for HBV using the ABON™ HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Tests (strip test), Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (ELISA test) and Huruian biology HBV detection kit (qPCR test). HBV positive samples were genotyped by sequencing to ascertain genotype identity. Results showed that of the 200 samples tested, both ABON™ HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Tests and Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (for ELISA) did not record any positive sample. However, Huruian biology HBV detection kit via qPCR recorded a total of twenty-three positive samples. Of the twenty-three samples, twenty were of genotype E while three were of genotype B. The results from this study showed that that qPCR is more accurate in HBV virus detection than ELISA technique and also HBV genotype E is the most common genotype isolated in Nigeria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/jopat.v22i1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jopat.v22i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乙型肝炎病毒(HBV) DNA诊断在HBV感染的传播中起着关键作用。准确的HBV检测方案将减少该病毒从献血者传播。因此,本研究比较了三种不同HBV方案在病毒检测中的HBV检测潜力。从伊巴丹大学血库的200名献血者中抽取血液,并使用ABON™HBsAg乙型肝炎表面抗原检测(试纸试验)、Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (ELISA试验)和huuian生物HBV检测试剂盒(qPCR试验)进行HBV检测。HBV阳性样本通过测序进行基因分型以确定基因型的同一性。结果显示,在200份检测样本中,ABON™HBsAg乙型肝炎表面抗原检测和Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (ELISA)均未记录到任何阳性样本。然而,huuian生物HBV qPCR检测试剂盒共记录了23份阳性样本。在23份样本中,20份为E基因型,3份为b基因型。本研究结果表明,qPCR检测HBV病毒比ELISA技术更准确,并且E基因型是尼日利亚分离到的HBV最常见的基因型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of three hepatitis b virus detection protocols in blood donors
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA diagnosis plays a critical role in the transmission of HBV infections. Accurate protocols in HBV detection will reduce the spread of the virus from blood donors. Therefore, this research compared the HBV detecting potentials of three different HBV protocols in the virus detection. Blood from 200 donors at the University college blood bank Ibadan were sampled and tested for HBV using the ABON™ HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Tests (strip test), Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (ELISA test) and Huruian biology HBV detection kit (qPCR test). HBV positive samples were genotyped by sequencing to ascertain genotype identity. Results showed that of the 200 samples tested, both ABON™ HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Tests and Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA (for ELISA) did not record any positive sample. However, Huruian biology HBV detection kit via qPCR recorded a total of twenty-three positive samples. Of the twenty-three samples, twenty were of genotype E while three were of genotype B. The results from this study showed that that qPCR is more accurate in HBV virus detection than ELISA technique and also HBV genotype E is the most common genotype isolated in Nigeria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信