空间动力系统中不同LCL结构的比较

A. Gabriele, G. Palmisano, V. Centonze, C. Ciminelli
{"title":"空间动力系统中不同LCL结构的比较","authors":"A. Gabriele, G. Palmisano, V. Centonze, C. Ciminelli","doi":"10.1109/ESPC.2019.8932058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Latching Current Limiters are fundamental devices in satellite space power systems required to be Single Point Failure Free. They are used to protect and distribute power as described and required by the ECSS-E-ST-20-20C standard [1]. A crucial aspect of these devices is the current control loop aiming at limiting the current in case of overload or short circuit. On one hand the fastest possible response is required to LCLs when a load fault condition occurs; on the other hand a minimum stability criterion needs to be respected. This paper presents a comparison between three different topologies of control loop: the first one based on a resistive feedback with only a proportional action, the second featuring a topology based on an inductive feedback, with proportional and derivative action, and the third based on an Op Amp, with derivative and integral action. The comparison, mainly based on the ECSS standard, investigates both theoretical and experimental results. These latter derive from tests conducted on prototypes and/or boards intended to find application in space missions. The solution relying on resistive feedback offers a very simple and cost effective solution, while the architecture based on inductive feedback uses an inductor in series with the shunt resistor which results in a reduction of the Current Overshoot as practical experiments demonstrate. Finally, the Op Amp based topology offers a better control of the current limitation value over the other two solutions.","PeriodicalId":6734,"journal":{"name":"2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC)","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between different LCL architectures in space power systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Gabriele, G. Palmisano, V. Centonze, C. Ciminelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESPC.2019.8932058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Latching Current Limiters are fundamental devices in satellite space power systems required to be Single Point Failure Free. They are used to protect and distribute power as described and required by the ECSS-E-ST-20-20C standard [1]. A crucial aspect of these devices is the current control loop aiming at limiting the current in case of overload or short circuit. On one hand the fastest possible response is required to LCLs when a load fault condition occurs; on the other hand a minimum stability criterion needs to be respected. This paper presents a comparison between three different topologies of control loop: the first one based on a resistive feedback with only a proportional action, the second featuring a topology based on an inductive feedback, with proportional and derivative action, and the third based on an Op Amp, with derivative and integral action. The comparison, mainly based on the ECSS standard, investigates both theoretical and experimental results. These latter derive from tests conducted on prototypes and/or boards intended to find application in space missions. The solution relying on resistive feedback offers a very simple and cost effective solution, while the architecture based on inductive feedback uses an inductor in series with the shunt resistor which results in a reduction of the Current Overshoot as practical experiments demonstrate. Finally, the Op Amp based topology offers a better control of the current limitation value over the other two solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESPC.2019.8932058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESPC.2019.8932058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

锁存限流器是卫星空间电力系统中实现无单点故障的基本器件。它们用于按照ECSS-E-ST-20-20C标准[1]的描述和要求保护和分配电力。这些装置的一个关键方面是电流控制回路,旨在在过载或短路的情况下限制电流。一方面,当负载发生故障时,要求lcl尽可能快地响应;另一方面,最低稳定性准则需要得到尊重。本文比较了三种不同拓扑的控制回路:第一种是基于电阻反馈的,只有比例作用;第二种是基于电感反馈的,有比例和导数作用;第三种是基于运算放大器的,有导数和积分作用。比较主要基于ECSS标准,研究了理论和实验结果。后者来自对用于空间任务的原型和/或板进行的测试。基于电阻反馈的解决方案提供了一个非常简单和经济有效的解决方案,而基于电感反馈的架构使用了一个电感与分流电阻串联,从而减少了电流超调,如实际实验所示。最后,基于运放的拓扑比其他两种解决方案提供了更好的电流限制值控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison between different LCL architectures in space power systems
Latching Current Limiters are fundamental devices in satellite space power systems required to be Single Point Failure Free. They are used to protect and distribute power as described and required by the ECSS-E-ST-20-20C standard [1]. A crucial aspect of these devices is the current control loop aiming at limiting the current in case of overload or short circuit. On one hand the fastest possible response is required to LCLs when a load fault condition occurs; on the other hand a minimum stability criterion needs to be respected. This paper presents a comparison between three different topologies of control loop: the first one based on a resistive feedback with only a proportional action, the second featuring a topology based on an inductive feedback, with proportional and derivative action, and the third based on an Op Amp, with derivative and integral action. The comparison, mainly based on the ECSS standard, investigates both theoretical and experimental results. These latter derive from tests conducted on prototypes and/or boards intended to find application in space missions. The solution relying on resistive feedback offers a very simple and cost effective solution, while the architecture based on inductive feedback uses an inductor in series with the shunt resistor which results in a reduction of the Current Overshoot as practical experiments demonstrate. Finally, the Op Amp based topology offers a better control of the current limitation value over the other two solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信