实践中的赋权:在批判空间中阅读文学

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elin Sundström Sjödin
{"title":"实践中的赋权:在批判空间中阅读文学","authors":"Elin Sundström Sjödin","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2020.1830842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reports on an empirical study of a literature project at a special residential home for detained youth in Sweden. Informed by critical literacy, the study explored the ways in which versions of empowerment in relation to reading were performed in a ‘critical space’. The ethnographic study was analytically inspired by the actor-network theory. Observations and interviews with students and teachers were used to understand the ambiguous and at times contradictory ways that empowerment was enacted; aligning with or refusing to align with dominant literacies or institutionalised expectations of development and improvement. Two different versions of empowerment are explored; these exist in tension with each other and are enacted in the material. The paper concludes with a discussion of the reading project as a critical space, a specific site that offered more critical elements of reading to take part in education.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"92 1","pages":"581 - 598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowerment(s) in practice: reading literature in a critical space\",\"authors\":\"Elin Sundström Sjödin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681366.2020.1830842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article reports on an empirical study of a literature project at a special residential home for detained youth in Sweden. Informed by critical literacy, the study explored the ways in which versions of empowerment in relation to reading were performed in a ‘critical space’. The ethnographic study was analytically inspired by the actor-network theory. Observations and interviews with students and teachers were used to understand the ambiguous and at times contradictory ways that empowerment was enacted; aligning with or refusing to align with dominant literacies or institutionalised expectations of development and improvement. Two different versions of empowerment are explored; these exist in tension with each other and are enacted in the material. The paper concludes with a discussion of the reading project as a critical space, a specific site that offered more critical elements of reading to take part in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"581 - 598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1830842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1830842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文报告了在瑞典的一个特殊的拘留青年住宅的文学项目的实证研究。在批判性素养的指导下,该研究探索了在“批判性空间”中与阅读相关的授权版本的方式。民族志研究在分析上受到行动者网络理论的启发。通过对学生和教师的观察和访谈,我们了解了授权实施的模糊和有时相互矛盾的方式;与主流文化或对发展和改进的制度化期望保持一致或拒绝保持一致。本文探讨了赋权的两种不同版本;这些存在于彼此之间的张力中,并在材料中发挥作用。文章最后讨论了阅读项目作为一个批判性空间,一个提供更多批判性阅读元素参与教育的特定场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empowerment(s) in practice: reading literature in a critical space
ABSTRACT This article reports on an empirical study of a literature project at a special residential home for detained youth in Sweden. Informed by critical literacy, the study explored the ways in which versions of empowerment in relation to reading were performed in a ‘critical space’. The ethnographic study was analytically inspired by the actor-network theory. Observations and interviews with students and teachers were used to understand the ambiguous and at times contradictory ways that empowerment was enacted; aligning with or refusing to align with dominant literacies or institutionalised expectations of development and improvement. Two different versions of empowerment are explored; these exist in tension with each other and are enacted in the material. The paper concludes with a discussion of the reading project as a critical space, a specific site that offered more critical elements of reading to take part in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信