娜拉胡萨达牙科医院门诊病案填写完整性分析

Q4 Dentistry
Caecilia Indarti, Lita Agustia
{"title":"娜拉胡萨达牙科医院门诊病案填写完整性分析","authors":"Caecilia Indarti, Lita Agustia","doi":"10.18196/di.v11i2.16077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical records (RM) as patient health information recorded assessment results, plans and implementation of care, treatment, integrated patient progress, as well as a summary of discharge for inpatients made by PPA. The results of medical record documents tracing at the Nala Husada dental hospital found that the RM was incomplete. This study aims to analyze the completeness of medical records filling that does not align with the accreditation standard of medical records management and health information (MRMIK). This study identified causal factors as a follow-up to implementing patient medical record management. It was conducted quantitatively with a descriptive observational approach. Data was obtained through observation, interviews, and documentation at the medical record unit during July 2022. The data was then processed and analyzed. Based on the analysis of the completeness of the 80 file documents, 86.25% were found to be complete, and 13.75% were incomplete. Incomplete medical record documents with good records were 17.4%, 16% important reports/records, 12.5% author authentication, and 8% patient identity. Factors causing incomplete filling of medical record documents with the management element approach included human error (lack of understanding and discipline, limited number of staff, training), Material and Machine (limited equipment, various documents, unspecific evaluation monitoring review), and method (incomplete regulatory studies), monitoring and evaluation are not continuous), and money (not included in the program budget plan). Recommendations to improve the completeness of medical record filling were training, sanctions, and rewards, regulation review, procedures for filling as per PPA requirements, and standardization of medical record forms.","PeriodicalId":11034,"journal":{"name":"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)","volume":"os8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Medical Record Document Filling Completeness of Outpatient at Nala Husada Dental Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Caecilia Indarti, Lita Agustia\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/di.v11i2.16077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical records (RM) as patient health information recorded assessment results, plans and implementation of care, treatment, integrated patient progress, as well as a summary of discharge for inpatients made by PPA. The results of medical record documents tracing at the Nala Husada dental hospital found that the RM was incomplete. This study aims to analyze the completeness of medical records filling that does not align with the accreditation standard of medical records management and health information (MRMIK). This study identified causal factors as a follow-up to implementing patient medical record management. It was conducted quantitatively with a descriptive observational approach. Data was obtained through observation, interviews, and documentation at the medical record unit during July 2022. The data was then processed and analyzed. Based on the analysis of the completeness of the 80 file documents, 86.25% were found to be complete, and 13.75% were incomplete. Incomplete medical record documents with good records were 17.4%, 16% important reports/records, 12.5% author authentication, and 8% patient identity. Factors causing incomplete filling of medical record documents with the management element approach included human error (lack of understanding and discipline, limited number of staff, training), Material and Machine (limited equipment, various documents, unspecific evaluation monitoring review), and method (incomplete regulatory studies), monitoring and evaluation are not continuous), and money (not included in the program budget plan). Recommendations to improve the completeness of medical record filling were training, sanctions, and rewards, regulation review, procedures for filling as per PPA requirements, and standardization of medical record forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)\",\"volume\":\"os8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v11i2.16077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v11i2.16077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

病历(Medical records, RM)作为患者的健康信息,记录了PPA对住院患者的评估结果、护理、治疗的计划和实施情况、患者的综合进展情况以及出院总结。在Nala Husada牙科医院追踪医疗记录文件的结果发现,记录不完整。本研究旨在分析病历填写不符合病历管理与健康信息认证标准(MRMIK)的完整性。本研究确定因果因素作为实施患者病历管理的随访。它是用描述性观察方法定量进行的。数据是在2022年7月期间通过在病历单位的观察、访谈和记录获得的。然后对数据进行处理和分析。通过对80份文件的完整性分析,发现86.25%的文件是完整的,13.75%的文件是不完整的。病历文件不完整但记录良好的占17.4%,重要报告/记录占16%,作者认证占12.5%,患者身份占8%。使用管理要素方法填写病历文件不完整的原因包括人为错误(缺乏理解和纪律、人员数量有限、培训)、材料和机器(设备有限、文件繁多、评估和监测审查不具体)、方法(监管研究不完整)、监测和评估不连续)和资金(未包括在项目预算计划中)。改善病历填写完整性的建议包括培训、制裁和奖励、法规审查、按照PPA要求填写的程序以及病历表格的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Medical Record Document Filling Completeness of Outpatient at Nala Husada Dental Hospital
Medical records (RM) as patient health information recorded assessment results, plans and implementation of care, treatment, integrated patient progress, as well as a summary of discharge for inpatients made by PPA. The results of medical record documents tracing at the Nala Husada dental hospital found that the RM was incomplete. This study aims to analyze the completeness of medical records filling that does not align with the accreditation standard of medical records management and health information (MRMIK). This study identified causal factors as a follow-up to implementing patient medical record management. It was conducted quantitatively with a descriptive observational approach. Data was obtained through observation, interviews, and documentation at the medical record unit during July 2022. The data was then processed and analyzed. Based on the analysis of the completeness of the 80 file documents, 86.25% were found to be complete, and 13.75% were incomplete. Incomplete medical record documents with good records were 17.4%, 16% important reports/records, 12.5% author authentication, and 8% patient identity. Factors causing incomplete filling of medical record documents with the management element approach included human error (lack of understanding and discipline, limited number of staff, training), Material and Machine (limited equipment, various documents, unspecific evaluation monitoring review), and method (incomplete regulatory studies), monitoring and evaluation are not continuous), and money (not included in the program budget plan). Recommendations to improve the completeness of medical record filling were training, sanctions, and rewards, regulation review, procedures for filling as per PPA requirements, and standardization of medical record forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信