眼神理解障碍专家和家长的诊断

IF 0.5 Q4 Health Professions
D. Möller, G. Furche, S. Slabon-Lieberz, G. Gaumert, A. Breitfuß, A. Licht
{"title":"眼神理解障碍专家和家长的诊断","authors":"D. Möller, G. Furche, S. Slabon-Lieberz, G. Gaumert, A. Breitfuß, A. Licht","doi":"10.1055/S-0028-1085435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Receptive language disorders affect the whole language, cognitive and emotional development of children. There are inconsistent data about the percentage of receptive language disorders among speech and language impaired children. Furthermore receptive language disorders are likely underdiagnosed. Aim of the study is to quantify receptive language disorders in children with speech and language disorders. More specifically, a) to assess the frequency of receptive language disorders in a group of preschool children with expressive speech and language disorders b) evaluation of diagnostic quality of subjective diagnoses of receptive disorders by experts and parents and c) consequences for diagnostic and therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The percentage of children with receptive language disorders (n=298) was assessed by using a language development test (SETK). The prediction of the receptive language abilities by experts and parents was compared with the final test results. The diagnostic quality was evaluated with 2x2 tables and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Ninety seven children showed limited receptive abilities (T-value<40). Parents predicted receptive language disorders correctly in 25 children, experts in 78. Likelihood ratios showed high evidence for diagnostic results of experts' judgement, whereas parents proved poor predictive capabilities. CONCLUSION: To correctly assess receptive language disorders in children with speech and language development disorders and to minimize negative consequences of incorrect diagnoses, multi-professional test-based diagnostic as well as clinical expertise is necessary. Parents’ subjective judgment is not predicitve for detection of receptive language disorders.","PeriodicalId":49480,"journal":{"name":"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor","volume":"14 1","pages":"129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blickdiagnose Sprachverständnisstörungen – Die diagnostische Güte von Experten- und Elternurteilen\",\"authors\":\"D. Möller, G. Furche, S. Slabon-Lieberz, G. Gaumert, A. Breitfuß, A. Licht\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/S-0028-1085435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Receptive language disorders affect the whole language, cognitive and emotional development of children. There are inconsistent data about the percentage of receptive language disorders among speech and language impaired children. Furthermore receptive language disorders are likely underdiagnosed. Aim of the study is to quantify receptive language disorders in children with speech and language disorders. More specifically, a) to assess the frequency of receptive language disorders in a group of preschool children with expressive speech and language disorders b) evaluation of diagnostic quality of subjective diagnoses of receptive disorders by experts and parents and c) consequences for diagnostic and therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The percentage of children with receptive language disorders (n=298) was assessed by using a language development test (SETK). The prediction of the receptive language abilities by experts and parents was compared with the final test results. The diagnostic quality was evaluated with 2x2 tables and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Ninety seven children showed limited receptive abilities (T-value<40). Parents predicted receptive language disorders correctly in 25 children, experts in 78. Likelihood ratios showed high evidence for diagnostic results of experts' judgement, whereas parents proved poor predictive capabilities. CONCLUSION: To correctly assess receptive language disorders in children with speech and language development disorders and to minimize negative consequences of incorrect diagnoses, multi-professional test-based diagnostic as well as clinical expertise is necessary. Parents’ subjective judgment is not predicitve for detection of receptive language disorders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"129-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0028-1085435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0028-1085435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:接受性语言障碍影响儿童的整体语言、认知和情感发展。关于语言和语言障碍儿童中接受性语言障碍的百分比数据不一致。此外,接受性语言障碍很可能未被充分诊断。本研究的目的是量化言语和语言障碍儿童的接受性语言障碍。更具体地说,a)评估一组具有表达性言语和语言障碍的学龄前儿童的接受性语言障碍的频率;b)评估专家和家长对接受性语言障碍的主观诊断的诊断质量;c)诊断和治疗的后果。患者和方法:使用语言发育测试(SETK)评估接受性语言障碍儿童的百分比(n=298)。专家和家长对接受性语言能力的预测与最终测试结果进行了比较。采用2x2表和似然比评价诊断质量。结果:97例患儿接受能力受限(t值<40)。父母正确预测了25个孩子的接受性语言障碍,专家预测了78个。似然比显示专家判断的诊断结果有很高的证据,而父母的预测能力较差。结论:为了正确评估言语和语言发育障碍儿童的接受性语言障碍,并尽量减少错误诊断的负面后果,需要多专业的基于测试的诊断和临床专业知识。父母的主观判断不能预测接受性语言障碍的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blickdiagnose Sprachverständnisstörungen – Die diagnostische Güte von Experten- und Elternurteilen
BACKGROUND: Receptive language disorders affect the whole language, cognitive and emotional development of children. There are inconsistent data about the percentage of receptive language disorders among speech and language impaired children. Furthermore receptive language disorders are likely underdiagnosed. Aim of the study is to quantify receptive language disorders in children with speech and language disorders. More specifically, a) to assess the frequency of receptive language disorders in a group of preschool children with expressive speech and language disorders b) evaluation of diagnostic quality of subjective diagnoses of receptive disorders by experts and parents and c) consequences for diagnostic and therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The percentage of children with receptive language disorders (n=298) was assessed by using a language development test (SETK). The prediction of the receptive language abilities by experts and parents was compared with the final test results. The diagnostic quality was evaluated with 2x2 tables and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Ninety seven children showed limited receptive abilities (T-value<40). Parents predicted receptive language disorders correctly in 25 children, experts in 78. Likelihood ratios showed high evidence for diagnostic results of experts' judgement, whereas parents proved poor predictive capabilities. CONCLUSION: To correctly assess receptive language disorders in children with speech and language development disorders and to minimize negative consequences of incorrect diagnoses, multi-professional test-based diagnostic as well as clinical expertise is necessary. Parents’ subjective judgment is not predicitve for detection of receptive language disorders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sprache-Stimme-Gehor
Sprache-Stimme-Gehor 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sprache · Stimme · Gehör ist die Fachzeitschrift für alle, die sich mit Sprach-, Stimm- und Hörstörungen beschäftigen – von Logopäden über Phoniater/Pädaudiologen bis hin zu Sprachheilpädagogen oder Hörgeschädigtenpädagogen. Sie vermittelt gesicherte medizinische Fakten für Ihre Fortbildung – maximaler Praxisnutzen, größtmögliche Unterstützung in Ihrem Alltag und der berühmte Blick über den Tellerrand sind unsere Ziele.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信