J. Marques, P. Baptista, A. C. Abreu, S. Monteiro, M. Pinto
{"title":"有晶状体人工晶状体植入术:175例","authors":"J. Marques, P. Baptista, A. C. Abreu, S. Monteiro, M. Pinto","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phakic IOL explantation was safe regarding visual acuity and ECL. Most patients explanted due to ECL showed a sustained improvement in cell density. Purpose: To evaluate the indications for pIOL explantation, pIOL survival time, and visual outcomes and access endothelial cell loss (ECL) after explantation. Setting: Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal. Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Methods: A chart review was performed for all consecutive patients who underwent pIOL explantation from January 2010 to December 2019 in a single center. Results: This study included 175 eyes of 112 patients (77% women). The mean pIOL survival was 12.9 ± 4.8 (3.7 to 28.6) years, and the mean follow-up period after explantation was 4.1 ± 3.0 (0.3 to 9.9) years. The most frequent causes for explantation were cataract formation (44.0%, n = 77) and ECL (50.3%, n = 88). During the follow-up period after explantation, the mean ECL rate was 2.27 ± 9.32%/year in the cataract group and −2.14 ± 10.24%/year in the ECL group, reflecting a positive change in cell density in the latter. 8 eyes (4.6%) required a corneal transplant during the follow-up. The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.17 ± 0.24 logMAR at the last visit. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that pIOL explantation, after a mean survival time of 13 years, was a safe procedure. The main causes for explantation were cataract formation and ECL. Most patients showed a sustained improvement in visual acuity and endothelial cell density after pIOL explantation, and yet its timing should be ideal to avoid irreversible complications.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"80 1","pages":"1004 - 1009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phakic intraocular lens explantation: series of 175 surgeries\",\"authors\":\"J. Marques, P. Baptista, A. C. Abreu, S. Monteiro, M. Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phakic IOL explantation was safe regarding visual acuity and ECL. Most patients explanted due to ECL showed a sustained improvement in cell density. Purpose: To evaluate the indications for pIOL explantation, pIOL survival time, and visual outcomes and access endothelial cell loss (ECL) after explantation. Setting: Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal. Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Methods: A chart review was performed for all consecutive patients who underwent pIOL explantation from January 2010 to December 2019 in a single center. Results: This study included 175 eyes of 112 patients (77% women). The mean pIOL survival was 12.9 ± 4.8 (3.7 to 28.6) years, and the mean follow-up period after explantation was 4.1 ± 3.0 (0.3 to 9.9) years. The most frequent causes for explantation were cataract formation (44.0%, n = 77) and ECL (50.3%, n = 88). During the follow-up period after explantation, the mean ECL rate was 2.27 ± 9.32%/year in the cataract group and −2.14 ± 10.24%/year in the ECL group, reflecting a positive change in cell density in the latter. 8 eyes (4.6%) required a corneal transplant during the follow-up. The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.17 ± 0.24 logMAR at the last visit. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that pIOL explantation, after a mean survival time of 13 years, was a safe procedure. The main causes for explantation were cataract formation and ECL. Most patients showed a sustained improvement in visual acuity and endothelial cell density after pIOL explantation, and yet its timing should be ideal to avoid irreversible complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"1004 - 1009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phakic intraocular lens explantation: series of 175 surgeries
Phakic IOL explantation was safe regarding visual acuity and ECL. Most patients explanted due to ECL showed a sustained improvement in cell density. Purpose: To evaluate the indications for pIOL explantation, pIOL survival time, and visual outcomes and access endothelial cell loss (ECL) after explantation. Setting: Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal. Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Methods: A chart review was performed for all consecutive patients who underwent pIOL explantation from January 2010 to December 2019 in a single center. Results: This study included 175 eyes of 112 patients (77% women). The mean pIOL survival was 12.9 ± 4.8 (3.7 to 28.6) years, and the mean follow-up period after explantation was 4.1 ± 3.0 (0.3 to 9.9) years. The most frequent causes for explantation were cataract formation (44.0%, n = 77) and ECL (50.3%, n = 88). During the follow-up period after explantation, the mean ECL rate was 2.27 ± 9.32%/year in the cataract group and −2.14 ± 10.24%/year in the ECL group, reflecting a positive change in cell density in the latter. 8 eyes (4.6%) required a corneal transplant during the follow-up. The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.17 ± 0.24 logMAR at the last visit. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that pIOL explantation, after a mean survival time of 13 years, was a safe procedure. The main causes for explantation were cataract formation and ECL. Most patients showed a sustained improvement in visual acuity and endothelial cell density after pIOL explantation, and yet its timing should be ideal to avoid irreversible complications.