国际法上国家主权与分离的复杂结:来自世界各国的证据

A. Shah, Nilofar Ihsan, Hina Malik
{"title":"国际法上国家主权与分离的复杂结:来自世界各国的证据","authors":"A. Shah, Nilofar Ihsan, Hina Malik","doi":"10.31703/gpr.2019(iv-iii).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is interesting to note that international law doesn't talk about the secession of any group from the parent state in express words. However, at the same time, it doesn't deny people's right to self-determination too. Despite all this ambiguity about secession in international law, state dissolution hasn't stopped. This secession is justified on two strands of theoretical arguments. The first one suggests that it is everyone's fundamental right to live or not to live in a particular state by forming a state of their own. The second one suggests that if a state commits atrocities on a particular community, and the victims exhaust all legal and democratic means to emancipate themselves and their community, they can resort to secession and separation from the parent state in the last resort. However, secession on such grounds is covered by norms and provisions of international law in the post-colonial world.","PeriodicalId":30483,"journal":{"name":"Palestrica mileniului III","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complex Knot between Sovereignty of States and Secession in International Law: Evidence from Around the World\",\"authors\":\"A. Shah, Nilofar Ihsan, Hina Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/gpr.2019(iv-iii).07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is interesting to note that international law doesn't talk about the secession of any group from the parent state in express words. However, at the same time, it doesn't deny people's right to self-determination too. Despite all this ambiguity about secession in international law, state dissolution hasn't stopped. This secession is justified on two strands of theoretical arguments. The first one suggests that it is everyone's fundamental right to live or not to live in a particular state by forming a state of their own. The second one suggests that if a state commits atrocities on a particular community, and the victims exhaust all legal and democratic means to emancipate themselves and their community, they can resort to secession and separation from the parent state in the last resort. However, secession on such grounds is covered by norms and provisions of international law in the post-colonial world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palestrica mileniului III\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palestrica mileniului III\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(iv-iii).07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palestrica mileniului III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(iv-iii).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有趣的是,国际法并没有明文规定任何群体从母国分裂出去。然而,与此同时,它也不否认人民的自决权。尽管国际法中关于分裂国家的说法含糊不清,但国家解体并没有停止。这种分离在两种理论论证中是合理的。第一种观点认为,通过建立自己的国家,每个人都有在某个特定国家生活或不生活的基本权利。第二种观点认为,如果一个国家对一个特定的社区实施了暴行,而受害者用尽了所有合法和民主的手段来解放自己和他们的社区,他们可以在最后的手段中诉诸分裂和脱离母国。但是,在后殖民世界中,基于这种理由的分裂为国际法的准则和规定所涵盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Complex Knot between Sovereignty of States and Secession in International Law: Evidence from Around the World
It is interesting to note that international law doesn't talk about the secession of any group from the parent state in express words. However, at the same time, it doesn't deny people's right to self-determination too. Despite all this ambiguity about secession in international law, state dissolution hasn't stopped. This secession is justified on two strands of theoretical arguments. The first one suggests that it is everyone's fundamental right to live or not to live in a particular state by forming a state of their own. The second one suggests that if a state commits atrocities on a particular community, and the victims exhaust all legal and democratic means to emancipate themselves and their community, they can resort to secession and separation from the parent state in the last resort. However, secession on such grounds is covered by norms and provisions of international law in the post-colonial world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信