我们应该禁食多少?Fontana小组的一项新研究表明,间歇性禁食对人类来说可能太温和了

V. Gorbunova
{"title":"我们应该禁食多少?Fontana小组的一项新研究表明,间歇性禁食对人类来说可能太温和了","authors":"V. Gorbunova","doi":"10.59368/agingbio.20230004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a calorie is not a calorie: metabolic and molecular e ff ects of intermittent fasting in humans; exploratory outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Tosti et al. Aging Biology Dietary restriction without malnutrition is the fi rst intervention found to extend lifespan in rodents and other organisms. Dietary restriction also has bene fi t in humans by reducing body weight, alleviating in fl ammation, and improving insulin sensitivity, among many other cardiometabolic and hormonal bene fi ts. However, continuous dietary restriction is di ffi cult for people to maintain. A more tolerable alternative to dietary restriction is intermittent fasting, where fasting happens every other day or on certain days of the week. Intermittent fasting extends lifespan and reduces in fl ammation in rodents, but whether it is equally bene fi cial in humans is unclear. A new study by Luigi Fontana, who is currently the scienti fi c director of the Charles Perkins Centre Royal Prince Alfred Clinic at The University of Sydney, shows that intermittent fasting is not as e ff ective in humans. In this randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Washington University in St. Louis where Fontana was a professor of medicine, overweight men and women were assigned to either intermittent fasting or Western-like diet for 6 months. In the second 6 months of the study, all participants underwent intermittent fasting. In the fasting group, participants were asked to eat non-starchy vegetable salads for lunch and dinner for two or three days a week. This novel “ vegetable fasting-mimicking ” approach helped to markedly improve compliance, and most of the participants completed the study, which is often not the case with more restrictive protocols. The study fi ndings were unexpected; although the intermittent fasting regiment induced an 8% weight loss and 16% reduction in total body fat, it did not alleviate in fl ammation and modestly improved insulin sensitivity. These fi ndings underscore that results from animal models cannot be easily extrapolated on humans. A day without food may provide a strong impact on a mouse with its fast metabolism, while having a milder e ff ect on a much larger human. More studies are needed to understand the impact of di ff erent degrees of dietary restriction on health in humans.","PeriodicalId":72130,"journal":{"name":"Aging Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Should We Fast? A New Study by the Fontana Group Suggests That Intermittent Fasting May Be Too Mild for Humans\",\"authors\":\"V. Gorbunova\",\"doi\":\"10.59368/agingbio.20230004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When a calorie is not a calorie: metabolic and molecular e ff ects of intermittent fasting in humans; exploratory outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Tosti et al. Aging Biology Dietary restriction without malnutrition is the fi rst intervention found to extend lifespan in rodents and other organisms. Dietary restriction also has bene fi t in humans by reducing body weight, alleviating in fl ammation, and improving insulin sensitivity, among many other cardiometabolic and hormonal bene fi ts. However, continuous dietary restriction is di ffi cult for people to maintain. A more tolerable alternative to dietary restriction is intermittent fasting, where fasting happens every other day or on certain days of the week. Intermittent fasting extends lifespan and reduces in fl ammation in rodents, but whether it is equally bene fi cial in humans is unclear. A new study by Luigi Fontana, who is currently the scienti fi c director of the Charles Perkins Centre Royal Prince Alfred Clinic at The University of Sydney, shows that intermittent fasting is not as e ff ective in humans. In this randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Washington University in St. Louis where Fontana was a professor of medicine, overweight men and women were assigned to either intermittent fasting or Western-like diet for 6 months. In the second 6 months of the study, all participants underwent intermittent fasting. In the fasting group, participants were asked to eat non-starchy vegetable salads for lunch and dinner for two or three days a week. This novel “ vegetable fasting-mimicking ” approach helped to markedly improve compliance, and most of the participants completed the study, which is often not the case with more restrictive protocols. The study fi ndings were unexpected; although the intermittent fasting regiment induced an 8% weight loss and 16% reduction in total body fat, it did not alleviate in fl ammation and modestly improved insulin sensitivity. These fi ndings underscore that results from animal models cannot be easily extrapolated on humans. A day without food may provide a strong impact on a mouse with its fast metabolism, while having a milder e ff ect on a much larger human. More studies are needed to understand the impact of di ff erent degrees of dietary restriction on health in humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59368/agingbio.20230004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59368/agingbio.20230004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当卡路里不再是卡路里时:人类间歇性禁食的代谢和分子效应;随机临床试验的探索性结果。Tosti等人。没有营养不良的饮食限制是第一个被发现可以延长啮齿动物和其他生物寿命的干预措施。限制饮食对人体也有好处,可以减轻体重,减轻炎症,提高胰岛素敏感性,以及其他许多心脏代谢和激素方面的好处。然而,持续的限制饮食对人们来说是很难维持的。一种比饮食限制更容易接受的替代方法是间歇性禁食,即每隔一天或每周的某些日子禁食。间歇性禁食延长啮齿类动物的寿命并减少炎症,但它是否对人类同样有益尚不清楚。悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心皇家阿尔弗雷德王子诊所的科学主任路易吉·丰塔纳的一项新研究表明,间歇性禁食对人类没有那么有效。在圣路易斯华盛顿大学进行的一项随机临床试验中,丰塔纳是该校的医学教授,超重的男性和女性被分配到间歇性禁食或西式饮食6个月。在研究的第二个6个月里,所有参与者都进行了间歇性禁食。在禁食组中,参与者被要求每周吃两到三天的无淀粉蔬菜沙拉作为午餐和晚餐。这种新颖的“模仿蔬菜禁食”方法显著提高了依从性,大多数参与者完成了研究,而在更严格的方案中,情况往往不是这样。研究结果出人意料;虽然间歇性禁食组导致体重减轻8%,体脂减少16%,但它并没有减轻炎症,也没有适度改善胰岛素敏感性。这些发现强调,动物模型的结果不能轻易地外推到人类身上。一天不吃东西可能会对新陈代谢快的老鼠产生强烈的影响,而对体型大得多的人的影响则要温和得多。需要更多的研究来了解不同程度的饮食限制对人类健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Much Should We Fast? A New Study by the Fontana Group Suggests That Intermittent Fasting May Be Too Mild for Humans
When a calorie is not a calorie: metabolic and molecular e ff ects of intermittent fasting in humans; exploratory outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Tosti et al. Aging Biology Dietary restriction without malnutrition is the fi rst intervention found to extend lifespan in rodents and other organisms. Dietary restriction also has bene fi t in humans by reducing body weight, alleviating in fl ammation, and improving insulin sensitivity, among many other cardiometabolic and hormonal bene fi ts. However, continuous dietary restriction is di ffi cult for people to maintain. A more tolerable alternative to dietary restriction is intermittent fasting, where fasting happens every other day or on certain days of the week. Intermittent fasting extends lifespan and reduces in fl ammation in rodents, but whether it is equally bene fi cial in humans is unclear. A new study by Luigi Fontana, who is currently the scienti fi c director of the Charles Perkins Centre Royal Prince Alfred Clinic at The University of Sydney, shows that intermittent fasting is not as e ff ective in humans. In this randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Washington University in St. Louis where Fontana was a professor of medicine, overweight men and women were assigned to either intermittent fasting or Western-like diet for 6 months. In the second 6 months of the study, all participants underwent intermittent fasting. In the fasting group, participants were asked to eat non-starchy vegetable salads for lunch and dinner for two or three days a week. This novel “ vegetable fasting-mimicking ” approach helped to markedly improve compliance, and most of the participants completed the study, which is often not the case with more restrictive protocols. The study fi ndings were unexpected; although the intermittent fasting regiment induced an 8% weight loss and 16% reduction in total body fat, it did not alleviate in fl ammation and modestly improved insulin sensitivity. These fi ndings underscore that results from animal models cannot be easily extrapolated on humans. A day without food may provide a strong impact on a mouse with its fast metabolism, while having a milder e ff ect on a much larger human. More studies are needed to understand the impact of di ff erent degrees of dietary restriction on health in humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信