失智症家庭照护者行为管理技能(K-BMS)韩文效度与信度:一项心理测验研究

Q4 Nursing
S. Jung, H. Cheon, Jiyeon Kim, Jun-Ah Song
{"title":"失智症家庭照护者行为管理技能(K-BMS)韩文效度与信度:一项心理测验研究","authors":"S. Jung, H. Cheon, Jiyeon Kim, Jun-Ah Song","doi":"10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Behavioral Management Skill (K-BMS) for family caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) and other types of dementia (non-AD).Methods: 258 family caregivers of people with AD and 201 family caregivers of people with non-AD were included to examine the K-BMS’s reliability and validity by psychometric tests. Item analysis, construct validity with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the known-groups method, concurrent validity test with correlations testing among a visual analogue scale (VAS), single general item (SGI), and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), and internal consistency reliability were conducted for the psychometric tests.Results: The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis yielded a two-factor model with 11 items. Results supported that the K-BMS was an appropriate model for both AD and non-AD groups with good convergent validity. Construct validity and reliability were established using the known-groups method and Cronbach’s ⍺. The concurrent validity was established with a VAS (AD: r=.22, p<.001; non-AD: r=.27, p<.001), SGI (AD: r=.30, p<.001), and ZBI (AD: r=.36, p<.001; non-AD: r=.40, p<.001).Conclusion: The K-BMS is a valid and reliable measurement to assess family caregivers’ skills to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia regardless of the type of dementia. Other scales to measure similar concepts must be developed further.","PeriodicalId":52377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Behavioral Management Skill (K-BMS) for Family Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Psychometric Testing Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Jung, H. Cheon, Jiyeon Kim, Jun-Ah Song\",\"doi\":\"10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Behavioral Management Skill (K-BMS) for family caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) and other types of dementia (non-AD).Methods: 258 family caregivers of people with AD and 201 family caregivers of people with non-AD were included to examine the K-BMS’s reliability and validity by psychometric tests. Item analysis, construct validity with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the known-groups method, concurrent validity test with correlations testing among a visual analogue scale (VAS), single general item (SGI), and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), and internal consistency reliability were conducted for the psychometric tests.Results: The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis yielded a two-factor model with 11 items. Results supported that the K-BMS was an appropriate model for both AD and non-AD groups with good convergent validity. Construct validity and reliability were established using the known-groups method and Cronbach’s ⍺. The concurrent validity was established with a VAS (AD: r=.22, p<.001; non-AD: r=.27, p<.001), SGI (AD: r=.30, p<.001), and ZBI (AD: r=.36, p<.001; non-AD: r=.40, p<.001).Conclusion: The K-BMS is a valid and reliable measurement to assess family caregivers’ skills to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia regardless of the type of dementia. Other scales to measure similar concepts must be developed further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估韩国版行为管理技能(K-BMS)对阿尔茨海默氏痴呆(AD)和其他类型痴呆(非AD)患者的家庭照顾者的效度和信度。方法:以258名AD患者家庭照顾者和201名非AD患者家庭照顾者为研究对象,采用心理测量法检验K-BMS的信度和效度。采用项目分析、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析的构念效度、已知群体法、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、单项一般量表(SGI)和Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)的并行效度检验和相关性检验,以及内部一致性信度。结果:探索性和验证性因子分析得到了包含11个项目的双因子模型。结果表明,K-BMS模型适用于AD组和非AD组,具有良好的收敛效度。采用已知群法和Cronbach 's法确定结构效度和信度。采用VAS (AD: r=)建立并发效度。22日,p <措施;non-AD: r =。27, p< 0.001), SGI (AD: r=。30, p<.001), ZBI (AD: r=。36岁的p <措施;non-AD: r =。40岁,p <措施)。结论:无论痴呆症类型如何,K-BMS都是评估家庭照顾者管理痴呆行为和心理症状技能的有效和可靠的测量方法。衡量类似概念的其他尺度必须进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Behavioral Management Skill (K-BMS) for Family Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Psychometric Testing Study
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Behavioral Management Skill (K-BMS) for family caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) and other types of dementia (non-AD).Methods: 258 family caregivers of people with AD and 201 family caregivers of people with non-AD were included to examine the K-BMS’s reliability and validity by psychometric tests. Item analysis, construct validity with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the known-groups method, concurrent validity test with correlations testing among a visual analogue scale (VAS), single general item (SGI), and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), and internal consistency reliability were conducted for the psychometric tests.Results: The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis yielded a two-factor model with 11 items. Results supported that the K-BMS was an appropriate model for both AD and non-AD groups with good convergent validity. Construct validity and reliability were established using the known-groups method and Cronbach’s ⍺. The concurrent validity was established with a VAS (AD: r=.22, p<.001; non-AD: r=.27, p<.001), SGI (AD: r=.30, p<.001), and ZBI (AD: r=.36, p<.001; non-AD: r=.40, p<.001).Conclusion: The K-BMS is a valid and reliable measurement to assess family caregivers’ skills to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia regardless of the type of dementia. Other scales to measure similar concepts must be developed further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信