Stephen Gosson的《虐待学派与男子气概的表现

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Per Sivefors
{"title":"Stephen Gosson的《虐待学派与男子气概的表现","authors":"Per Sivefors","doi":"10.35360/njes.600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the representation of masculinity in Stephen Gosson’s anti-theatrical pamphlet The schoole of abuse (1579). Discussing the author’s self-presentation in the prefatory material and elsewhere in the text, the essay investigates the often contradictory and defensive authorial persona and compares it to Gosson’s dedicatee Sir Philip Sidney’s rhetoric of self-presentation in his Defence of Poesy, as well as to Gosson’s own, later pamphlet Playes confuted in fiue actions (1582). The basic result of the discussion is that Gosson’s pamphlet has a conflicted relation to early modern notions of manhood; more specifically, the essay concludes, Gosson’s attacks on poetry and theatre as ‘effeminate’ are conveyed through an authorial persona that itself comes across as excessive, licentious and less than manly by early modern standards.","PeriodicalId":35119,"journal":{"name":"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stephen Gosson’s The Schoole of Abuse and the Representation of Masculinity\",\"authors\":\"Per Sivefors\",\"doi\":\"10.35360/njes.600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay examines the representation of masculinity in Stephen Gosson’s anti-theatrical pamphlet The schoole of abuse (1579). Discussing the author’s self-presentation in the prefatory material and elsewhere in the text, the essay investigates the often contradictory and defensive authorial persona and compares it to Gosson’s dedicatee Sir Philip Sidney’s rhetoric of self-presentation in his Defence of Poesy, as well as to Gosson’s own, later pamphlet Playes confuted in fiue actions (1582). The basic result of the discussion is that Gosson’s pamphlet has a conflicted relation to early modern notions of manhood; more specifically, the essay concludes, Gosson’s attacks on poetry and theatre as ‘effeminate’ are conveyed through an authorial persona that itself comes across as excessive, licentious and less than manly by early modern standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了斯蒂芬·戈松的反戏剧小册子《虐待学派》(1579)中对男子气概的表现。本文讨论了作者在序言材料和文本其他地方的自我表现,研究了经常矛盾和辩护的作者角色,并将其与戈松的奉献者菲利普·西德尼爵士在他的《诗歌辩护》中对自我表现的修辞进行了比较,以及戈松自己后来的小册子《戏剧》(1582)。讨论的基本结果是,戈松的小册子与早期现代男子气概的概念有一种矛盾的关系;更具体地说,这篇文章总结道,戈松对诗歌和戏剧的攻击是“娘娘腔”,这是通过一个作者的角色来传达的,而这个角色本身在早期现代标准下就显得过度、放荡和缺乏男子气概。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stephen Gosson’s The Schoole of Abuse and the Representation of Masculinity
This essay examines the representation of masculinity in Stephen Gosson’s anti-theatrical pamphlet The schoole of abuse (1579). Discussing the author’s self-presentation in the prefatory material and elsewhere in the text, the essay investigates the often contradictory and defensive authorial persona and compares it to Gosson’s dedicatee Sir Philip Sidney’s rhetoric of self-presentation in his Defence of Poesy, as well as to Gosson’s own, later pamphlet Playes confuted in fiue actions (1582). The basic result of the discussion is that Gosson’s pamphlet has a conflicted relation to early modern notions of manhood; more specifically, the essay concludes, Gosson’s attacks on poetry and theatre as ‘effeminate’ are conveyed through an authorial persona that itself comes across as excessive, licentious and less than manly by early modern standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies
NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信