黑格尔的美学教训:Hotho版本和Nachschriften版本之间的根本差异

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Italo Angelo Debernardi Cárcamo
{"title":"黑格尔的美学教训:Hotho版本和Nachschriften版本之间的根本差异","authors":"Italo Angelo Debernardi Cárcamo","doi":"10.7764/67.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues the need to reread Hegelian aesthetics based on the transcripts of Hegel’s Berlin lectures on aesthetics. To do this, the differences between these notebooks and the Lectures on Aesthetics edited by Hotho, are exposed and analyzed, showing the most relevant modifications and manipulations that the editor made both on the structure and the content of Hegelian aesthetics. Thus, the analysis begins with the inclusion of the natural beauty in the Lectures on Aesthetics; then, it deals with the systematization and triadic structure of this work; and, finally, the problematic canonical definition of the ideal.","PeriodicalId":43414,"journal":{"name":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","volume":"5 1","pages":"9-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Las lecciones sobre estética de Hegel: discrepancias fundamentales entre la edición de Hotho y los Nachschriften\",\"authors\":\"Italo Angelo Debernardi Cárcamo\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/67.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues the need to reread Hegelian aesthetics based on the transcripts of Hegel’s Berlin lectures on aesthetics. To do this, the differences between these notebooks and the Lectures on Aesthetics edited by Hotho, are exposed and analyzed, showing the most relevant modifications and manipulations that the editor made both on the structure and the content of Hegelian aesthetics. Thus, the analysis begins with the inclusion of the natural beauty in the Lectures on Aesthetics; then, it deals with the systematization and triadic structure of this work; and, finally, the problematic canonical definition of the ideal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"9-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/67.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/67.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以黑格尔在柏林的美学讲座为基础,论述重读黑格尔 美学的必要性。 这,   分歧 这些 笔记本和  讲座  美学 编辑 由 Hotho, 暴露  分析, 显示  最 相关 修改 和 操作   编辑 了     结构和  内容  黑格尔 美学。 因此,分析从将自然美纳入 美学讲座开始;然后,论述了本文的系统化和三元结构;最后,理想的规范定义有问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Las lecciones sobre estética de Hegel: discrepancias fundamentales entre la edición de Hotho y los Nachschriften
This paper argues the need to reread Hegelian aesthetics based on the transcripts of Hegel’s Berlin lectures on aesthetics. To do this, the differences between these notebooks and the Lectures on Aesthetics edited by Hotho, are exposed and analyzed, showing the most relevant modifications and manipulations that the editor made both on the structure and the content of Hegelian aesthetics. Thus, the analysis begins with the inclusion of the natural beauty in the Lectures on Aesthetics; then, it deals with the systematization and triadic structure of this work; and, finally, the problematic canonical definition of the ideal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信