骨关节炎的手术入路。

K. Günther
{"title":"骨关节炎的手术入路。","authors":"K. Günther","doi":"10.1053/BERH.2001.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) often benefit from properly performed surgical procedures. However, the scientific database from studies investigating appropriate timing of surgery, patient morbidity, quality of life before and after the intervention, and cost utility of different procedures is insufficient. In order to allow a fair allocation of resources in future health care systems, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with defined entry criteria, sufficient number of patients, and valid outcome measures should be performed for different surgical approaches. They should especially include control groups with conservative treatment in order to allow an evidence based comparison between different therapeutic approaches. At present, however, optimal management of OA as a dynamic disease process must include a combination of conservative as well as operative treatment modalities. In case of malalignment, instability and intra-articular causes of mechanical dysfunction, correction of these abnormalities and relief of symptoms can be achieved with properly indicated and performed osteotomies. Debridement by arthroscopy and arthotomy probably does not alter the natural history of OA and true clinical outcomes are difficult to determine, but it can provide transient relief of symptoms. Joint replacement has to be considered for refractory pain associated with disability and radiological deterioration. As the pre-operative functional status seems to influence the outcome not only in joint replacement but also in joint-preserving osteotomies, the indication for these procedures might be expanded in the future.","PeriodicalId":79797,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology","volume":"10 1","pages":"627-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical approaches for osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"K. Günther\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/BERH.2001.0178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) often benefit from properly performed surgical procedures. However, the scientific database from studies investigating appropriate timing of surgery, patient morbidity, quality of life before and after the intervention, and cost utility of different procedures is insufficient. In order to allow a fair allocation of resources in future health care systems, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with defined entry criteria, sufficient number of patients, and valid outcome measures should be performed for different surgical approaches. They should especially include control groups with conservative treatment in order to allow an evidence based comparison between different therapeutic approaches. At present, however, optimal management of OA as a dynamic disease process must include a combination of conservative as well as operative treatment modalities. In case of malalignment, instability and intra-articular causes of mechanical dysfunction, correction of these abnormalities and relief of symptoms can be achieved with properly indicated and performed osteotomies. Debridement by arthroscopy and arthotomy probably does not alter the natural history of OA and true clinical outcomes are difficult to determine, but it can provide transient relief of symptoms. Joint replacement has to be considered for refractory pain associated with disability and radiological deterioration. As the pre-operative functional status seems to influence the outcome not only in joint replacement but also in joint-preserving osteotomies, the indication for these procedures might be expanded in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"627-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/BERH.2001.0178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/BERH.2001.0178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

骨关节炎(OA)患者通常受益于适当的外科手术。然而,从调查手术的适当时机、患者发病率、干预前后的生活质量以及不同手术的成本效用的研究中获得的科学数据库是不足的。为了在未来的卫生保健系统中公平分配资源,应该对不同的手术入路进行具有明确的入路标准、足够数量的患者和有效的结果测量的随机对照试验(rct)。他们尤其应该包括保守治疗的对照组,以便在不同治疗方法之间进行基于证据的比较。然而,目前,OA作为一个动态疾病过程的最佳管理必须包括保守和手术治疗方式的结合。在不对准、不稳定和关节内原因导致的机械功能障碍的情况下,可以通过适当指示和实施截骨术来纠正这些异常和缓解症状。关节镜和关节切开术清创可能不会改变骨性关节炎的自然病史,真正的临床结果也难以确定,但它可以暂时缓解症状。关节置换术必须考虑与残疾和放射学恶化相关的难治性疼痛。由于术前功能状态似乎不仅影响关节置换术的疗效,而且影响保关节截骨术的疗效,因此这些手术的适应症在未来可能会扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical approaches for osteoarthritis.
Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) often benefit from properly performed surgical procedures. However, the scientific database from studies investigating appropriate timing of surgery, patient morbidity, quality of life before and after the intervention, and cost utility of different procedures is insufficient. In order to allow a fair allocation of resources in future health care systems, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with defined entry criteria, sufficient number of patients, and valid outcome measures should be performed for different surgical approaches. They should especially include control groups with conservative treatment in order to allow an evidence based comparison between different therapeutic approaches. At present, however, optimal management of OA as a dynamic disease process must include a combination of conservative as well as operative treatment modalities. In case of malalignment, instability and intra-articular causes of mechanical dysfunction, correction of these abnormalities and relief of symptoms can be achieved with properly indicated and performed osteotomies. Debridement by arthroscopy and arthotomy probably does not alter the natural history of OA and true clinical outcomes are difficult to determine, but it can provide transient relief of symptoms. Joint replacement has to be considered for refractory pain associated with disability and radiological deterioration. As the pre-operative functional status seems to influence the outcome not only in joint replacement but also in joint-preserving osteotomies, the indication for these procedures might be expanded in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信