一种鲁棒经验贝叶斯方法检测差异表达基因

Fugui Wang, Lin Hou, Jiangfeng Xu, M. Qian, Minghua Deng
{"title":"一种鲁棒经验贝叶斯方法检测差异表达基因","authors":"Fugui Wang, Lin Hou, Jiangfeng Xu, M. Qian, Minghua Deng","doi":"10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increase in genome-wide experiments and sequenced genomes, the analysis of large data sets has become commonplace in biology. It is often the case that thousands of features in a genome-wide data set are tested against null hypotheses, where only a small number of features are expected to be significant. The empirical Bayesian method (EB) is one of the most powerful methods to address such an issue, which has attracted much attention in literature. Here we propose an altered EB method, which is more robust and gives a more reasonable statistical interpretation. Our method is applied on both simulated and real data, and it outperforms the EB method.","PeriodicalId":6389,"journal":{"name":"2009 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics","volume":"45 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Robust Empirical Bayesian Method for Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes\",\"authors\":\"Fugui Wang, Lin Hou, Jiangfeng Xu, M. Qian, Minghua Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increase in genome-wide experiments and sequenced genomes, the analysis of large data sets has become commonplace in biology. It is often the case that thousands of features in a genome-wide data set are tested against null hypotheses, where only a small number of features are expected to be significant. The empirical Bayesian method (EB) is one of the most powerful methods to address such an issue, which has attracted much attention in literature. Here we propose an altered EB method, which is more robust and gives a more reasonable statistical interpretation. Our method is applied on both simulated and real data, and it outperforms the EB method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全基因组实验和基因组测序的增加,对大数据集的分析在生物学中已经变得司空见惯。通常情况下,全基因组数据集中的数千个特征都是根据零假设进行测试的,其中只有少数特征预计是重要的。经验贝叶斯方法(empirical Bayesian method, EB)是解决这一问题最有力的方法之一,引起了文献的广泛关注。在这里,我们提出了一种改进的EB方法,它更稳健,并给出了更合理的统计解释。我们的方法在模拟和实际数据上都得到了应用,并且优于EB方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Robust Empirical Bayesian Method for Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes
With the increase in genome-wide experiments and sequenced genomes, the analysis of large data sets has become commonplace in biology. It is often the case that thousands of features in a genome-wide data set are tested against null hypotheses, where only a small number of features are expected to be significant. The empirical Bayesian method (EB) is one of the most powerful methods to address such an issue, which has attracted much attention in literature. Here we propose an altered EB method, which is more robust and gives a more reasonable statistical interpretation. Our method is applied on both simulated and real data, and it outperforms the EB method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信